Can mouth washes containing chlorhexidine 0.12% be used as synonym of a water solution of chlorhexidine 0.12%?

Authors

  • Ivana Barbosa Suffredini Universidade Paulista; Center for Research in Biodiversity; Extraction Laboratory
  • Cintia Helena Coury Saraceni Universidade Paulista; School of Dentistry
  • Ingrit Elida Collantes Díaz Universidade Paulista; Center for Research in Biodiversity; Extraction Laboratory

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-82502015000200014

Abstract

;Chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX) is a gold standard drug in dentistry and is widely used as a reference in both ;in vitro; and ;in vivo;experiments. Due to ease of access, mouth washes containing CHX 0.12% are used as a substitute for aqueous CHX 0.12% solution in laboratory experiments. Additionally, it is well known that for product flavor purposes, volatile compounds are added to mouth washes formulations. Volatiles added to CHX 0.12% may improve wash's antibacterial ability. Volatiles add potency to the mouth wash formulation. Compared with an aqueous CHX 0.12% solution, it is proposed that CHX solutions and Periogard; would have antimicrobial activity. Antimicrobial activity was assessed in the present study via disk diffusion assays against ;Streptococcus mutans;, ;Streptococcus sanguinis;and ;Escherichia coli;. Periogard; showed a significantly higher antibacterial activity in relation to CHX 0.12% (p;0.05). Periogard;(r); volatiles were analyzed by gas-chromatography/mass spectrometry (GCMS) and the presence of antibacterial menthol, menthone, isomenthol, menthyl acetate, trans-anethol and eugenol was verified. Finally, the use of Periogard; as a synonym of CHX 0.12% must be avoided, because its antibacterial activity is closely related to CHX 1%.

;

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2015-06-01

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Can mouth washes containing chlorhexidine 0.12% be used as synonym of a water solution of chlorhexidine 0.12%?. (2015). Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 51(2), 367-372. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-82502015000200014