The influence of the post-processing method on knoop hardness of photosensitive resins for 3D SLA printer used in Dentistry


  • Mayra Torres Vasques Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo
  • Julia Nascimento Mulder Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo
  • Debora Santos Machado School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo
  • Dalva Cruz Lagana Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo



Digital dentistry, Polymers, Hardness Knoop, CAD/CAM, Dental Resin, Additive Manufacturing


Objectives: The aim of this study is to compare the mechanical characteristics of resins for 3D printers with the acrylic resins that have been used in Dentistry, according to the post-processing method. Materials and Methods: Using an SLA 3D printer (Form 2 – Formlabs, Massachusetts, USA), samples (discs) were produced with the printer’s resins, Dental SG®, Dental LT®, Clear®, and Grey®. Samples made of thermopolimerized and auto polymerized acrylic resins were produced as well (Gold Standart parameters). The Knoop Hardness (KH) tests were performed using microdurometer HMV-2 (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). Results: The results showed the Dental SG resin presented the highest KH, compared with thermopolimerized acrylic resin, the Clear and Dental LT resins KH were compared with auto polymerized acrylic resin, and the non-post cured Grey resin (not for intraoral use), as well as the Dental LT resin, showed the lowest KH. Conclusions: Considering the hardness, the printer’s resins are comparable with the acrylic resins established, when the post-processing method is thoroughly followed. The absence of material’s post-processing reduce significantly the material’s hardness. Clinical relevance: Regarding the use of 3D printing in Dentistry, the development of materials adequate for the equipment, biocompatible for intraoral uses, and compatible mechanical proprieties are essential.


Download data is not yet available.


Revilla-León M, Ozcan M. Additive Manufacturing technologies used for processing polymers: current status and potential application in Prosthetic Dentistry. J Prosthodont. 2018;28(2):1-13. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12801.

Schweiger J, Stumbaum J, Edelhoff D, Guth JF. Systematics and concepts for the digital production of complete dentures: risks and opportunities. Int J Comput Dent. 2018;21(1):41-56.

Bhargav A, Sanjairaj C, Rosa V, Feng LW, Fuh YhJ. Applications of additive manufacturing in dentistry: a review. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2018;106(5):2058-2064. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.33961.

Kawala M, Smardz J, Adamczyk L, Grychowska N, Wieckiewicz M. Selected applications for current polymers in prosthetic dentistry – state of the art. Curr Med Chem. 2018;25:1-11.

Saisadan D, Manimaran P, Meenapriva PK. In vitro comparative evaluation of the mechanical properties of temporary restorative materials used in fixed partial denture. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2016;8(suppl 1):S105-S109. doi: 10.4103/0975-7406.191936.

Sivakumar I, Arunachalam KS, Saijan S, Ramaraju AV, Rao B, Kamaraj B. Incorporation of antimicrobial macromolecules in acrylic denture base resin: a research composition and update. J Prostodont. 2014;23(4):284-90. doi: 10.1111/jopr12105.

Formlabs [Internet]. Clear safety data sheet [cited 2019 Oct 25]. Available from:

Formlabs [Internet]. Dental LT clear safety data sheet [cited 2019 Oct 25]. Available from:

Formlabs [Internet]. Dental SG safety data sheet [cited 2019 Oct 25]. Available from:

Knoop F, Peters CG, Emerson WB. A sensitive pyramidal-diamond tool for indentation measurements. Research Paper RP1220. National Bureau of Standards, U.S. Dept. Commerce. 1939:211-40.

Goiato MC, Santos DM, Andreotti AM, Nobrega AS, Moreno A, Haddad MF, et al. Effect of Beverages and Mouthwashes on the Hardness of Polymers Used in Intraoral Prostheses. J of Prosthod. 2014;23:559-64.

Fernandes AU, Goiato MC, Santos DM. Effect of weathering and thickness on the superficial microhardness of acrylic resin and ocular button. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2009;32:283-87.

Kurzmann C, Janjić K, Shokoohi-Tabrizi H, Edelmayer M, Pensch M, Moritz A, et al. Evaluation of resins for stereolithographic 3D-printed surgical guides: the response of L929 cells and human gingival fibroblasts. Biomed Res Int. 2017;4057612.

Formlabs [Internet]. A guide to post-curing Formlabs resins [cited 20198 Oct 25]. Available from:

Washing settings [Internet]. Form wash time settings [cited 2019 Oct 25]. Available from:

Voet VSD, Strating T, Schnelting GHM, Dijkstra P, Tietema M, Xu J, et al. Biobased acrylate photocurable resin formulation for stereolithography 3D printing. ACS Omega. 2018;3(2):1403-8.






Original Research