The Internal Senses in Nemesius, Plotinus and Galen: the Beginning of an Idea

Authors

  • Muhammad Umar Faruque University of California, Berkeley

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1981-9471.v10i2p119-139

Keywords:

internal senses, common sense, memory, phantasia, logos, Nemesius, Plotinus, Galen, Ancient Pshychology

Abstract

This study traces the notion of the internal senses in three ancient authors, namely Nemesius, Plotinus and Galen. It begins with Nemesius, and then by going backward ends with Galen. The textual evidence investigated in this study shows clearly that Galen, after acknowledging the Platonic tripartite soul, locates the various dunameis of the soul in the brain. The “localization” theory of Galen plays a crucial role in paving the way for the foundation of the internal senses, which both Plotinus and Nemesius adapted. Just as with the external senses one can locate various sense-organs in different parts of the body, viz., touch, smell, sight etc., so too with the internal senses, thanks to Galen, one is able to locate them in various organs of the body. Thus philosophers are able to explain the role of all these different (internal) senses in their account of sense-perception.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aëitius, A. (1935–1950). Libri medicinales. In A. Oliveiri (Ed.). Corpus medicorum Graecorum: Vol. 8. Berlin: Academiae Litterarum (original work written in the early sixth century).

Aristotle. 1984. The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation. Edited by Jonathan Barnes. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Armstrong, A.H. 1966-1988. Plotinus (The Enneads). Loeb Classical Library. 7 volumes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Avicenna. 1959. al-Shifāʾ: fī al-nafs Fazlur. Fazlur Rahman (ed.), Avicenna’s De anima (Arabic text). Being the Psychological Part of Kitāb al-Shifāʾ. London: Oxford University Press.

Black, D.L. 2000. “Imagination and Estimation: Arabic Paradigms and Western Transformations,” Topoi, 19 (2000) 59–75. DOI: 10.1023/A:1006399407731

Black, D.L. 1993. “Estimation (wahm) in Avicenna: The Logical and Psychological Dimensions.” Dialogue 32: 219–258. DOI: 10.1017/s0012217300014414

Blumenthal, H.J. 1971. Plotinus’ Psychology: His Doctrines of the Embodied Soul. Martinus Nihjoff: the Hague.

Blumenthal, H.J. 1976. “Plotinus’ Adaptation of Aristotle’s Psychology: Sensation, Imagination, and Memory”. the Significance of Neoplatonism. Ed. R. Baine Harris. International Society for Neoplatonic Studies. Norfolk, VA: Old Dominion University, 41-58 (reprinted in Blumenthal, H.J. 1993. Soul and Intellect: Studies in Plotinus and Later Neoplatonism Aldershot, Hampshire: Variorum).

Brisson, L. and Pradeau, J.F. 2002-2010. Plotin Traités. 9 volumes. Paris: GF Flammarion.

Caluori, Damian. 2005. “The Essential Functions of a Plotinian Soul”. Rhizai Vol. II, No. 1, 75-93.

Dillon, John. 1986. “Plotinus and the Transcendental Imagination”. Religious Imagination. Ed. James Mackey. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Donini, Pierluigi. 2008. “Psychology.” In R. J. Hankinson (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Galen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/ccol9780521819541.007

Emilsson, Eyjolfur K. 1988. Plotinus on Sense-Perception: A Philosophical Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511720017

Galen. 1916. Galen on the Natural Faculties (A. J. Brock, trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Galen. 1968. Galen on the Usefulness of the Parts of the Body (M. Tallmadge May, trans.). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Galen. 1976. Galen on the Affected Parts (R. E. Siegel, ed. and trans.). Basel, Switzerland: S. Karger.

Galen. 1980. On the Doctrines of Hippocrates and Plato (3 vols., P. de Lacy, trans.). Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.

Galen. 1997. Galen: Selected Works. P. N. Singer (ed. and trans.). Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.

Green, Christopher D. 2003. “Where did the Ventricular Localization of Mental Faculties Come from?” Journal of History of the Behavioral Sciences 39, no.2 (2003): 131–142. DOI: 10.1002/jhbs.10088

Hankinson, R.J. (ed.). 2008. The Cambridge Companion to Galen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/ccol9780521819541

Hasse, D.N. 2001. “Avicenna on Abstraction.” In R. Wisnovsky (ed.). Aspects of Avicenna. Princeton: Markus Wiener Publishers.

Johansen, Thomas K. 2005. In Defense of Inner Sense: Aristotle on Perceiving that One Sees, Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 7 (2005): 235.

Jouanna, Jacques. 2009. Does Galen have a Medical Programme for Intellectuals and the Faculties of the Intellect?” In Christopher Gill et al. (eds.), Galen and the World of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 0.1017/cbo9780511770623.012

King, R. A. H. 2009. Aristotle and Plotinus on Memory. Berlin and New York. DOI: /10.1515/9783110214635

Mattock, J.N. 1972. “A Translation of the Arabic Epitome of Galen’s Book Peri êthôn.” In Stern, Hourani and Brown (eds.), Islamic Philosophy and the Classical Tradition: Essays Presented by his Friends and Pupils to Richard Walzer on his Seventieth Birthday (Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.

Nemesius, On the Nature of Man, trans. R. W. Sharples and P. J. van der Eijk (Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.

Pormann, Peter E. 2013. “Avicenna on Medical Practice, Epistemology, and the Physiology of the Inner Senses.” In Interpreting Avicenna, ed. Peter Adamson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/cbo9781139047890.006

Rocca, Julius. 2012. “From Doubt to Certainty. Aspects of the Conceptualisation and Interpretation of Galen’s Natural Pneuma.” In M. Horstmanshoff, H. King, C. Zittel (eds), Blood, Sweat and Tears. The Changing Concepts of Physiology from Antiquity into Early Modern Europe. Leiden: Brill. DOI: 10.1163/9789004229204_027

Scarborough, J. 1984. “Symposium on Byzantine Medicine. Introduction”, Dumbarton Oaks Papers 38 (1984): ix–xvi.

Sheppard, Anne. 2003. “The Mirror of Imagination: the Influence of Timaeus 70eff ”. Ancient Approaches to Plato’s Timaeus. University of London: Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies Supplement 78, 203-212.

Singer, P.N. 2013. Galen: Psychological Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tieleman, Teun. 1998. “Plotinus on the seat of the soul: reverberations of Galen and Alexander in Enn. IV, 3 [27], 23,” Phronesis 43 (4), 306–325.

Warren, Edward. 1966. “Imagination in Plotinus,” The Classical Quarterly 16, no. 2 (1966): 277-285. DOI: 10.1017/s0009838800029931

Warren, E.W. 1965. “Memory in Plotinus,” CQ 15: 252-260.

Wolfson, H. A. (1935). The Internal Senses in Latin, Arabic, and Hebrew Philosophic Texts. Harvard Theological Review, 28, 69–133.

Downloads

Published

2016-11-01

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

The Internal Senses in Nemesius, Plotinus and Galen: the Beginning of an Idea. (2016). Journal of Ancient Philosophy, 10(2), 119-139. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1981-9471.v10i2p119-139