Seneca's Medea and De ira: justice and revenge
I try to show Seneca’s Medea provides us with two elements -which, as far as I am aware, have not received proper attention- that complement his approach to the phenomenon of anger and can improve our understanding of the Stoic psychology of action defended in De ira. The first element is linked to the question of whether the angry person is responsive to reasons or not; the second one concerns the question of indifference, tolerance and forgiveness, and addresses the issue of Medea's inability to conceive of a more appropriate or desirable irtreaction to Jason’s offense than anger.
Aygon, J.-P. 2000. “Le jeu des passions dans la Médée de Sénèque (v. 893-971).” Vita Latina 160 (1).21–31. https://doi.org/10.3406/vita.2000.1096
Berry, J. M. 2001. “The Dramatic Incarnation of Will in Seneca’s Medea.” Journal of Dramatic Theory and Criticism 10 (2).3–18.
Chaumartin, F.-R. 2014. “Philosophical Tragedy?” In Brill’s Companion to Seneca. Philosopher and Dramatist, edited by Gregor Damschen and Andreas Hei. Leiden. 653–68. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004217089_051
Gill, C.. 1983. “Did Chrysippus Understand Medea?” Phronesis 28.136–49. https://doi.org/10.1163/156852883x00086
Gill, C. 1987. “Two Monologues of Self-Division: Euripides, Medea 1021-80 and Seneca, Medea 893-977.” In Homo Viator: Classical Essays for John Bramble, edited by Michael Whitby, Philip R. Hardie, and Mary Whitby. Bristol. 25–37.
Graver, M. 2007. Stoicism and Emotion. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226305202.001.0001
Guastella, G. 2001. “Virgo, Coniunx, Mater: The Wrath of Seneca’s Medea.” Classical Antiquity 20 (2).197–220. https://doi.org/10.1525/ca.2001.20.2.197
Henry, D. and Walker, B. 1967. “Loss of Identity: Medea Superest?. A Study of Seneca’s Medea.” Classical Philology 62 (3).169–81. https://doi.org/10.1086/365254
Kaufman, D. H. 2014. “Seneca on the Analysis and Therapy of Occurrent Emotions.” In Seneca Philosophus, edited by Jula Wildberger and Marcia L. Colish. Berlin. 111–33. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110349863.111
Liebermann, W-L. 2014. “Medea.” In Brill’s Companion to Seneca. Philosopher and Dramatist, edited by Gregor Damschen and Andreas Heil. Leiden: Brill. 459–74. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004217089_037
Marti, B. M. 1945. “Seneca’s Tragedies. A New Interpretation.” Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 76.216–45. https://doi.org/10.2307/283337
Monteleone, Maria. 2014. “De Ira.” In Brill’s Companion to Seneca. Philosopher and Dramatist, edited by Gregor Damschen and Andreas Heil. Leiden. 127–34. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004217089_010
Nussbaum, M. 1996. The Therapy of Desire. Theory and Praxis in Hellenistic Ethics. New Jersey.
Pratt, N. T. 1948. “The Stoic Base of Senecan Drama.” Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 79.1–11. https://doi.org/10.2307/283349
Schiesaro, A. 1997. “Passion, Reason and Knowledge in Seneca’s Tragedies.” In The Passions in Roman Thought and Literature, edited by Susanna Morton Braund and Christopher Gill. Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511586163.008
Schiesaro, A. 2003. The Passions in Play. Thyestes and the Dynamics of Senecan Drama. Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511482373
Seneca. 2010a. Tragediae] Six Tragedies. Translated by Emily Wilson. Oxford.
Seneca. 2010b. Anger, Mercy, Revenge. Translated by Robert A. Kaster and Martha Craven Nussbaum. The Complete Works of Lucius Annaeus Seneca. Chicago. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226748535.001.0001
Sorabji, R. 2000. Emotion and Peace Of Mind. From Stoic Agitation to Christian Temptation. The Gifford Lectures. Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199256600.001.0001
Staley, G. A. 2010. Seneca and the Idea of Tragedy. Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195387438.001.0001
Tietze, Victoria. 2007. “The Psychology of Uncertainty in Senecan Tragedy.” Illinois Classical Studies 12 (1).135–41.
Vogt, K. M. 2006. “Anger, Present Injustice and Future Revenge in Seneca’s De Ira.” In Seeing Seneca Whole. Perspectives on Philosophy, Poetry and Politics, edited by Katharina Volk and Gareth D. Williams. Leiden. 127–34.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC By 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).