Athenaeus and the Control
Very early experiments described in ancient literature usually have no detailed explanation of the methods used let alone the explicit Control expected by modern scientists for comparison with Treatments. Athenaeus describes a rarely recorded exception in The Deipnosophistae which has been briefly noted in scientific literature but not sufficiently contextualized. The experiment described has one treatment, a control and Athenaeus cites the desirability of replication, making this passage read like a modern text rather than an ancient one. Because technical processes were invented in ancient times I assume that experiments were also practiced, even though they are not described in ancient literature. This passage in Athenaeus exemplifies, by rare contrast, the general lack of description for ancient scientific methods. This lack may be because the ancient practitioners of technical processes did not have the reason modern scientists use for disclosure of all methods and results. Moderns achieve monetization that is protected by Intellectual Property Law or by acquisition of authority followed by salaried teaching in the academy. Ancient experimenters protected their discoveries by secrecy and maintained monopolies by concealment, an inconvenience for modern scholars. The form of ancient literature is important for this subject: it is not like modern scientific literature. When the ancients mention scientific subjects in writing it is in the form of literary discourse and debate where the aim is cerebral. There is no description of technical details where the aim is to allow replication of the experiment. Comfortable logic not experiment is described and intellectual improvement was usually the aim of ancient literature, rather than practical outcomes. The only reason we have knowledge of ancient practitioners of something similar to modern scientific methods from literature is that their kind of technical antics were briefly mentioned by ancient authors, because of their surprising and amusing nature.
Adolph, E. F. (1927) The Growth of Experimentation in the Early Sciences. The Scientific Monthly 25(1): 19-24.
Banas, J. (2006) Albert the Great as a scientist. Organon F 13(1): 16-31.
Boring, E. G. (1954) The nature and history of experimental control. The American Journal of Psychology 67(4): 573-589.
Bos, A. P. (2007) Aristotle on Dissection of Plants and Animals and his Concept of the Instrumental Soul-Body. Ancient Philosophy 27(1): 95-106.
Cichorius, C. (1922) Ein Patentgesetz aus dem griechischen Altertum. Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik. Journal of Economics and Statistics 63(1): 46-48.
Clegg, B. (2003) Roger Bacon, the first Scientist. Carol and Graph: New York.
Corcoran, T. H. (1971) Naturales Quaestiones by Seneca. Loeb Classical Library: Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Cuomo, S. (2007) Technology and culture in Greek and Roman Antiquity. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
Cuomo, S. (2011) A Roman engineer's tales. The Journal of Roman Studies 101: 143-165.
Diamond, J. M. (1983) Ecology: laboratory, field and natural experiments. Nature 304 (5927): 586587.
Drake, S. (1973) Galileo's experimental confirmation of horizontal inertia: unpublished manuscripts (Galileo Gleanings XXII). Isis 64(3): 291-305.
Fitch, J. G. (2013) Palladius, Opus Agriculturae. Prospect Books.
Fort, G. F. (1881) The Early History and Antiquities of Freemasonry: As Connected with Ancient Norse Guilds, and the Oriental and Mediœval Building Fraternities. Bradley and Company, Philadelphia.
Frumkin, M. (1945) The Origin of Patents. Journal of the Patent Office Society 27(3): 143-149.
Granger, F. (1970) Vitruvius, De Architectura. Loeb Classical Library: Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Greene, K. (2008) Inventors, invention, and attitudes toward technology and innovation. The Oxford handbook of engineering and technology in the classical world, chapter 32. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
Gulick, C. (1927) Athenaeus: The Deipnosophists. Vol. 1. Loeb Classical Library: Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Hort, S. A. (1916) Enquiry into Plants, by Theophrastus. Loeb Classical Library: Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 70 and 79.
Johnson, S. (1768) A Dictionary of the English Language. London, 3rd edition.
Krauth, J. (2000) Experimental Design, Volume 14. Elsevier Science.
Levey, M. (1956) Babylonian chemistry: a study of Arabic and second millenium BC perfumery. Osiris 12: 376-389.
McClure, L. (2003) Subversive laughter: The sayings of courtesans in book 13 of Athenaeus' Deipnosophistae. American Journal of Philology 124(2): 259-294.
Mill, J. S. (1843) A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive: Being a Connected view of the Principles of Evidence, and the Methods of Scientific Investigation, Volume 1, Parker: London.
Naylor, R. (1976) Galileo: Real experiment and didactic demonstration. Isis 67(3): 398-419.
Olson, S. D. (2010) Athenaeus: The Learned Banqueters. Loeb Classical Library: Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Piozzi, H. L. (1822) Anecdotes of Samuel Johnson, LL.D. during the last Twenty Years of his Life. Allman: London.
Popper, K. (1959) The logic of Scientific Discovery. Basic Books: New York. Prioreschi, P. (1988) Roman Medicine. Horatius Press: Omaha, Nebraska.
Rackham, H. (1965) Pliny, Natural History. Vol. IV. Loeb Classical Library: Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Semmelweis, I. P. (1861) Die Aetiologie, der Begriff und die Prophylaxis des Kind-bettfiebers. Pest, Wien and Leipzig: C. A. Hartleben. Translated by Frank P. Murphy in 1941.
Simpson, J. A. & Weiner, E. S. C. (1989) The Oxford English Dictionary. Clarendon Press: Oxford, 2nd edition.
Snow, J. (1855) On the mode of communication of cholera. Second edition, John Churchill.
Taub, L. (2017) Science Writing in Greco-Roman Antiquity. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
Thorndike, L. (1923) History of Magic and Experimental Science. Columbia University Press: New York.
Tröhler, U. (2005) Lind and scurvy: 1747 to 1795. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 98(11): 519-522.
Venticinque, P. F. (2010) Family affairs: guild regulations and family relationships in Roman Egypt. Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 50(2): 273-294.
Witty, M. (2016) Ancient Roman Urine Chemistry. Acta Archaeologica 87(1): 179-191.
Witty, M. (2018) Athenaeus describes the most ancient intellectual property. Prometheus 35(2): 137-143.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC By 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).