METHODOLOGICAL DISCUSSION AND PILOTING OF LCA-BASED ENVIRONMENTAL INDICATORS FOR PRODUCT STAGE ASSESSMENT OF BRAZILIAN BUILDINGS

Autores

  • Marcella Ruschi Mendes Saade UNICAP
  • Maristela Gomes da Silva Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo
  • Vanessa Gomes da Silva UNICAMP

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/gtp.v9i1.89987

Palavras-chave:

life cycle indicators, embodied carbon, embodied energy

Resumo

The International Energy Agency (IEA)’s Annex 57 was established to advance on evaluation of embodied energy and GHG emissions for building construction. Its activities include recommendation of common calculation methods and disclosure of regional benchmarks. Process-based, input-output or hybrid life cycle assessment (LCA) can support such calculations. Identification of the major products that describe key building typologies plays a strategic role in the tasks of streamlining indicators’ monitoring scope and LCI data gathering in contexts with little LCA practice consolidation. Given these motivations and backdrops, our main goals are (i) to calculate a selected set of LCA-based indicators to synthetically describe environmental performance of construction products for three functionally equivalent case studies; (ii) to detect the major contributors to embodied energy (EE) and emissions (EGWP); and (iii) to examine the implications of considering embodied CO2 versus total GHG emissions. The selected metrics include – besides EE and EGWP targeted by Annex 57 – the blue water footprint (bWF), non-renewable primary material consumption (NRc) and volatile organic compounds (VOC) emissions. Production cycle modeling used previously collected national data, as well as secondary data extracted from national and international literature or adapted from international databases whenever considered as reasonably similar to Brazilian processes. EE and EGWP results were calculated using the Cumulative Energy Demand (CED) method and the CML 2001 baseline v. 2.05 method, respectively, and are presented for the top contributing products. NRc, bWF and VOC calculations were directly derived from the inventories and discussed in more detail for cement and concrete. Around 80% of the total embodied energy was related to seven construction products, while four of them also responded for around 80% of embodied GWP. Enlarging the database to encompass ten core products would increase coverage to over 93%. For cement and concrete, partial replacement of clinker by ground granulated blast furnace slag brought substantial reductions in the calculated values for all indicators but bWF, which unveils the effect of the water-intensive granulation process. Further research is expected to advance in LCI development and validation to enable the use of life cycle-based metrics to support decision-making within the national building sector.

Downloads

Os dados de download ainda não estão disponíveis.

Biografia do Autor

  • Marcella Ruschi Mendes Saade, UNICAP
    CV Lattes: http://lattes.cnpq.br/1215282385787845
  • Maristela Gomes da Silva, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo
    CV: http://lattes.cnpq.br/4450263733589061
  • Vanessa Gomes da Silva, UNICAMP
    CV: http://lattes.cnpq.br/2699432222237841

Referências

AGOPYAN, V.; SOUZA, U.E.L.; PALIARI, J.C.; ANDRADE, A.C. Alternativas para a redução do desperdício de materiais nos canteiros de obras: relatório final. São Paulo: EPUSP/PCC; 1998.

ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DE NORMAS TÉCNICAS (ABNT). Cimento Portland composto. NBR 11.578. Rio de Janeiro, 1991.

ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DE NORMAS TÉCNICAS (ABNT). Cimento Portland de alto-forno. NBR 5.735. Rio de Janeiro, 1991.

ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DE NORMAS TÉCNICAS (ABNT). Cimento Portland comum. NBR 5732. Rio de Janeiro, 1991.

BASBAGILL, J.; FLAGER, F.; LEPECH, M; FISCHER, M. Application of life cycle assessment to early stage building design for reduced embodied environmental impacts. Building and Environment, 2012; doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.11.009.

BLENGINI, G. A. Life cycle of buildings, demolition and recycling potential: A case study in Turin, Italy. Building and Environment 2009; v.44, p. 319-330.

BLENGINI, G. A.; DI CARLO, T. Energy-saving policies and low-energy residential buildings: an LCA case study to support decision makers in Piedmont (Italy). International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 2010; v.15, p. 652-665.

BRIBRIÁN, I.G.; CAPILLA, A.V.; USÓN, A.A. Life cycle assessment of building materials: Comparative analysis of energy and environmental impacts and evaluation of the eco-efficiency improvement potential. Building and Environment, 2011; v. 46, p.1133-1140.

CAMARINI, G. 1995. Desempenho de misturas cimento Portland e escória de alto-forno submetidas à cura térmica. Thesis (PhD). Escola Politécnica da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES ACTION PLAN (ETAP). The Carbon Trust Helps UK Businesses Reduce their Environmental Impact. Press Release, 2007. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/etap/pdfs/jan07_carbon_trust_initiative.pdf, accessed in May 25th, 2012.

EUROPEAN COMMITTEE FOR STANDARDIZATION. EN 15643-2: Sustainability of construction works - Assessment of buildings - Part 2: Framework for the assessment of environmental Performance. 2011.

EUROPEAN COMMITTEE FOR STANDARDIZATION. EN 15978: Sustainability of construction works. Assessment of environmental performance. 2011b.

EUROPEAN COMMITTEE FOR STANDARDIZATION. EN 15804: Sustainability of construction works – Environmental product declarations – Core rules for the product category of construction products. 2012.

FINNVEDEN, G.; HAUSCHILD, M.Z.; EKVALL, T.; GUINÉE, J.; HEIJUNGS, R.; HELLWEG, S.; et al. Recent developments in Life Cycle Assessment. Journal of Environmental Management 2009; v.91, p.1–21.

GANGOLELLS, M.; CASALS, M.; GASSÓ, S.; FORCADA, N.; ROCA, X.; FUERTES, A. A methodology for predicting the severity of environmental impacts related to the construction process of residential buildings. Building and Environment 2009; v.44, p.558-571.

GOEDKOOP, M., SPRIENSMA, R. The Eco-indicator 99: A Damage Oriented Method for Life Cycle Assessment, Methodology Report, second edition. Pré Consultants, Amersfoort (NL), Netherlands. 2000.

GOMES, V.; SAADE, M.R.M.; LIMA, B.W.F.; MININEL, L.S.; SILVA, M.G. Life beyond operational stage: exploring lifecycle zero energy definitions. In: iiSBE Net Zero Built Environment 2014 Symposium: Nature-Based Building Performance: Net Zero Energy, Water, Carbon, and Waste. Proceedings. University of Florida: Gainesville, FL, 6-7 March 2014.

GUINÉE, J.B.; GORRÉE, M.; HEIJUNGS, R.; HUPPES, G.; KLEIJN, R.; KONING, A. de; OERS, L. van; WEGENER SLEESWIJK, A.; SUH, S.; UDO DE HAES, H.A.; BRUIJN, H. DE; DUIN, R. van; HUIJBREGTS, M.A.J. Handbook on lifecycle assessment. Operational guide to the ISO standards. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 2002. ISBN 1-4020-0228-9.

HAMMOND, G.; JONES, C. Inventory of carbon & energy (ICE). Bath: Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Bath. 2011.

HAUSCHILD, M., WENZEL, H. Environmental Assessment of Products – Vol. 2: Scientific Background, Chapman & Hall, London (UK). 1998.

HOEKSTRA, A.Y.; CHAPAGAIN, A.K.; ALDAYA, M.M.; MEKONNEN, M.M. The water footprint assessment manual: setting the global standard. Earthscan Ltd., London, UK. 2011.

INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR STANDARDIZATION (ISO). ISO 14040: Environmental Management – Lifecycle Assessment – Principles and Framework. Geneva, Switzerland. 2006a.

INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR STANDARDIZATION (ISO). ISO 14044: Environmental management — Lifecycle assessment — Requirements and guidelines. Geneva, Switzerland. 2006b.

INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR STANDARDIZATION (ISO). ISO/DIS 14046.2. Environmental management - Water footprint - Principles, requirements and guidelines Geneva, Switzerland. s.d. (under development as of February 26th, 2014).

INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR STANDARDIZATION (ISO). ISO 14047: Environmental management — Lifecycle assessment — Application examples. Geneva, Switzerland. 2012.

INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR STANDARDIZATION (ISO). ISO 14048: Environmental management — Lifecycle assessment — Data documentation format. Geneva, Switzerland. 2002.

INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR STANDARDIZATION (ISO). ISO 14064-1: Greenhouse gases - Part 1: Specification with guidance at the organization level for quantification and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions and removals. Geneva, Switzerland. 2006c.

INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR STANDARDIZATION (ISO). ISO 14064-2: Greenhouse gases - Part 2: Specification with guidance at the project level for quantification, monitoring and reporting of greenhouse gas emission reductions or removal enhancements. Geneva, Switzerland. 2006d.

INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR STANDARDIZATION (ISO). ISO 14064-3: Greenhouse gases - Part 3: Specification with guidance for the validation and verification of greenhouse gas assertions. Geneva, Switzerland. 2006e.

INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR STANDARDIZATION (ISO). ISO/TS 14067: Greenhouse gases - Carbon footprint of products - Requirements and guidelines for quantification and communication. Geneva, Switzerland. 2013.

INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR STANDARDIZATION (ISO). ISO 21929-1: Sustainability in building construction -- Sustainability indicators -- Part 1: Framework for the development of indicators and a core set of indicators for buildings. Geneva, Switzerland. 2011.

JEFFERSON, I.; HUNT, D.V.L.; BIRCHALL, C.A.; ROGERS, C.D.F. Sustainability indicators for environmental geotechnics. In: PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS. Engineering Sustainability 160 (ES2); p.57–78, 2007. doi: 10.1680/ensu.2007.160.2.57.

JOLLIET, O.; MARGNI, M.; CHARLES, R.; HUMBERT, S.; PAYET, J.; REBITZER, G.; ROSENBAUM, R. IMPACT 2002+: A New Life Cycle Impact Assessment Methodology. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, v.8, n.6, p. 324-330, 2003

JONES, C.; HAMMOND, G. (2010), Energy analysis: Method and application, Supergen HiDEF/BSEBEC Training Workshop: ‘Sustainability and the environment’, University of Bath, 7-8 June 2010.

KARIMPOUR, M.; BELUSKO, M.; XING, K.; BRUNO, F. Minimising the life cycle energy of buildings: Review and analysis. Building and Environment 2014; v.73, p. 106-114.

MANFREDINI, C.; SATTLER, M.A. Estimativa da energia incorporada a materiais de cerâmica vermelha no Rio Grande do Sul. Ambiente Construído 2005; v.5, n.1, p. 23-37.

OLIVEIRA, F.R.M.; SILVA, M. G.; SILVA, V. G. Exploring life-cycle-based indicators for integrated sustainability assessment of building structural frames in concrete. In: CIB WBC2013 - CIB World Business Congress 2013: Construction and Society. Brisbane: CIB WBC2013, 2013. v. 1.

PARLIAMENTARY OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (POST). Carbon footprint of electricity generation. POSTnote 268, October 2006. London, UK, 2006. Available at: http://www.parliament.uk/documents/post/postpn268.pdf, accessed in July 20th, 2012.

PASSER, A.; KREINER, H.; MAYDL, P. Assessment of the environmental performance of buildings: A critical evaluation of the influence of technical building equipment on residential buildings. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 2012; v.17, p. 1116-1130.

ROH, S.; TAE, S.; SHIN, S.; WOO, J. Development of an optimum design program (SUSB-OPTIMUM) for the life cycle CO2 assessment of an apartment house in Korea. Building and Environment 2014; v.73, p. 40-54.

SAADE, M.R.M.; SILVA, M.G.; GOMES, V.; FRANCO, H.G.; SCHWAMBACK, D.; LAVOR, B. Proposition and preliminary analysis of a core set of indicators to describe material eco-efficiency of Brazilian buildings. In: 4th CIB Conference on Smart and Sustainable Built Environments – SASBE 2012, São Paulo. Proceedings, São Paulo, 2012, pp.525-532.

SAADE, M.R.M.; SILVA, M.G.; GOMES, V.; FRANCO, H.G.; SCHWAMBACK, D.; LAVOR, B. Material Eco-efficiency Indicators for Brazilian buildings. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, v.3, i.1, 2014 (Accepted manuscript. In press). ISSN: 2046-6099

SILVA, M.G. (Coord). Concreto de alto desempenho com elevados teores de escória de alto-forno: estratégia para consolidar o mercado da escória de alto-forno em cimentos e concretos. 2006. (Research report).

SILVA, M.G. Influência da cura térmica em pastas e argamassas de cimentos com escória de alto-forno. Thesis (PhD). Escola Politécnica da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. 232p. 1998.

SILVA, V.G. Indicadores de sustentabilidade de edifícios: estado da arte e desafios para desenvolvimento no Brasil. Ambiente Construído 2007; v.7, n.1, p. 47-66.

STEEN, B. A systematic approach to environmental priority strategies in product development (EPS). 2000-General System Characteristics & 2000-Models and Data. Chalmers, CPM report: 1999, 4 and 5, http://eps.esa.chalmers.se/download.htm

TANESI, J. 2010. Contribuição ao desenvolvimento de especificações por desempenho para concretos com escória de alto-forno. Thesis (PhD). Faculdade de Engenharia Civil, Arquitetura e Urbanismo. Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.

UNITED NATIONS. UN ST/ESCAP/2561 – Eco-efficiency indicators: measuring resource-use efficiency and the impact of economic activities on the environment. 28p. Thailand, 2009. Available at: http://www.unescap.org/esd, accessed in May 25th, 2012.

VERBEECK, G.; HENS, H. Life cycle inventory of buildings: A calculation method. Building and Environment 2010; v.47, p. 1037-1041.

WALLHAGEN, M.; GLAUMANN, M.; MALMQVIST, T. Basic building life cycle calculations to decrease contribution to climate change: Case study on an office building in Sweden. Building and Environment 2011; v.46, p. 1863-1871.

WIEDMANN, T.; MINX, J. A Definition of 'Carbon Footprint'. In: Pertsova CC, editor. Ecological Economics Research Trends. New York: Nova Science Publishers; 2008, p. 1-11.

WILSON, J.; TYEDMERS, P.; PELOT, R. Contrasting and comparing sustainable development indicator metrics. Ecological Indicators 2007; v.7, p. 299-314.

Downloads

Publicado

2015-02-03

Edição

Seção

Artigos

Como Citar

SAADE, Marcella Ruschi Mendes; SILVA, Maristela Gomes da; SILVA, Vanessa Gomes da. METHODOLOGICAL DISCUSSION AND PILOTING OF LCA-BASED ENVIRONMENTAL INDICATORS FOR PRODUCT STAGE ASSESSMENT OF BRAZILIAN BUILDINGS. Gestão & Tecnologia de Projetos, São Carlos, v. 9, n. 1, p. 43–62, 2015. DOI: 10.11606/gtp.v9i1.89987. Disponível em: https://revistas.usp.br/gestaodeprojetos/article/view/89987.. Acesso em: 19 abr. 2024.