Functional performance according to gestational age and birth weight of preschool children born premature or with low weight

Autores

  • Elvidina N. Adamson-Macedo Maternal-Infant Mental Health University of Wolverhampton; School of Health and Wellbeing

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.20043

Resumo

Premature labour is a major health problem.Besides medical factors, risk factors include lowersocial class, less education, single marital status,low income younger maternal age, low body weight,ethnicity, smoking, poor housing. The long termsequelae can be severe and the cost - financiallyand socially - of care is high. Preterm birth is indeeda major clinical public heath problem that accountsfor nearly 50% of all neonatal deaths.

Referências

Lemos RA, et al.1 Functional Performanceaccording to gestational age and birth weightof preschool children born premature or withlow weight. Hum Growth Dev. 2012;22:(1):00-002.

Rugolo, L. M. S. S. Crescimento e desenvolvi-mento a longo prazo do premature extremo. J Pediatr. 2005; 81 (1):101-1093.

Msall, M. E.; Avery, R. C.;Tremont, M. R.; Lima,J. C.; Rogers, M. L.; Hogan, D. P. FunctionalDisability and School Activity Limitations in 41300 School-Age Children: Relationship toMedical Impairments. Pediatrics. 2003; 111(3): 548-53.4.

Mancini, M. C. et al. Efeito moderador do riscosocial na relação entre risco biológico desem-penho functional infantil. Rev Bras Saude MaternInfant. 2004;4(1):25-34.

Khan, N. Z.; Muslima, H. et al.Neurodevelopmental outcomes of preterminfants in Bangladesh. Pediatrics. 2006; 118(1):280-9.6.

Fily, A.; Pierrat, V.; Delportec, V.; Breart, G.;Truffert, P.; Behalf of the EPIPAGE Nord-Pas-de-Calais Study Group. Factors associated WithNeurodevelopmental Outcome at 2 Years AfterPreterm Birth: The Population-Based Nord-Pas-de-Calais EPIPAGE Cohort. Pediatrics, v.117,n.2, p. 357-66, 2006.

Eickmann, S. H.; Lira, P. I. C.; Lima, M. C. De-senvolvimento mental e motor aos 24 mesesde crianças nascidas a termo com baixo peso.Arq Neuropsiquiatria. 2002; 60(3B): 748-54.8.

Adamson-Macedo, E. N. Neonatal HealthPsychology [NNHP]: Theories and practice. Expanding Frontiers of Neonatology. 2004; v.25 (Suppl. 1), p. 9-34.

Downloads

Publicado

2012-04-01

Edição

v. 22 n. 1 (2012)

Seção

Editorial

Licença

CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL  PUBLISHERS

 

Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:

 

Publishers should:

 

  • Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
  • Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
  • Protect intellectual property and copyright
  • Foster editorial independence

 

Publishers should work with journal editors to:

 

  • Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:

–         Editorial  independence

–         Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research

–         Authorship

–         Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards

–         Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor

–         Appeals and complaints

  • Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
  • Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
  • Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
  • Maintain the integrity of the academic record
  • Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
  • Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
  • Publish content on a timely basis