The Challenge of the Public Communication of Science Public Communication of Science in Brazil

Sophia Karlla Almeida Motta Gallo

doi:10.7322/jhgd.61588

O Desafio de Fazer Comunicação Pública da Ciência no Brasil

Autores

Sophia Karlla Almeida Motta Gallo Centro de Estudos do Crescimento e do Desenvolvimento Humano (CDH); Medical School of ABC.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.61588

Palavras-chave:

Desafio de fazer comunicação, comunicação pública, comunicação pública da ciência, ciência no Brasil

Resumo

A Tese de doutorado de Carlos Antonio Teixeira descreve e caracteriza concepções que coordenadores de programas de pós-graduação em saúde coletiva do Brasil têm acerca da divulgação científica enquanto expressão de comunicação pública da ciência. A partir de uma pesquisa exploratória, observacional, com abordagem qualitativa, o Autor chega e apresenta os resultados do estudo, contextualizando-os num mundo globalizado em que a informação circula sem fronteiras e a velocidade de sua renovação é exponencialmente aumentada com o uso das novas tecnologias de comunicação e informação.

Biografia do Autor

Sophia Karlla Almeida Motta Gallo, Centro de Estudos do Crescimento e do Desenvolvimento Humano (CDH); Medical School of ABC.

Post-Doutoral student in Health Sciences, (Medical School of ABC) and Researcher of
Centro de Estudos do Crescimento e do Desenvolvimento Humano (CDH).

Referências

Reference

Teixeira CA (2013). The public communication of Science in graduate programs in public health in Brazil: a perspective of coordinators. [PhD thesis]. São Paulo: Faculdade de Saúde Pública da USP. 220p.

Downloads

Publicado

2013-08-30

Edição

v. 23 n. 2 (2013)

Seção

Resenha

Licença

CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL PUBLISHERS

Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:

Follow this code, and encourage the editors they work with to follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Edi- tors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf)
Ensure the editors and journals they work with are aware of what their membership of COPE provides and en- tails
Provide reasonable practical support to editors so that they can follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Editors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf_)

Publishers should:

Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
Protect intellectual property and copyright
Foster editorial independence

Publishers should work with journal editors to:

Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:

– Editorial independence

– Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research

– Authorship

– Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards

– Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor

– Appeals and complaints

Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
Maintain the integrity of the academic record
Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
Publish content on a timely basis