Refeudalisation revisited

destruction of deliberative democracy

  • Graham Murdock Loughborough University
Keywords: Populism, Authoritarianism, Frankfurt School, Refeudalisation, Public sphere

Abstract

Donald Trump’s election as American President and the successful referendum campaign to exit the European Union in Britain have prompted renewed interest in the challenges posed to deliberative democracy by right-wing populism. This paper returns to the research on authoritarianism developed by the Frankfurt School in Germany and the United States, particularly to their emphasis on the performative construction of appeals, and to Jürgen Habermas’ later characterisation of the translation of citizens into spectating subjects as a refeudalisation of the public sphere, and argues that these analyses continue to provide indispensable resources for understanding contemporary developments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ADORNO, T. Anti-semitism and fascist propaganda. In: _______. The stars down to earth and other essays in irrational culture. London: Routledge, 1994. p. 162-171.

_______. The psychological technique of Martin Luther Thomas’ radio addresses. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2000.

BARTHES, R. Mythologies. London: Paladin, 1973.

BARTLETT, E. People are calling out Ukip’s new anti-EU poster for resembling “outright Nazi propaganda” indy100, London, 16 jun. 2016. Available at: <https://goo.gl/goSNmD>. Access on: 26 jul. 2018.

BENJAMIN, W. Illuminations. London: Fontana, 1970.

CRICK, B. In defence of politics. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1962. DO SOCIAL media threaten democracy? The Economist, London, 4 nov. 2017. p. 11. Available at: <https://goo.gl/ts5GHn>. Access on: 31 jul. 2018.

GITLIN, T. Public sphere or public sphericles? In: LEIBES, T.; CURRAN, J. (Eds.). Media, ritual and identity. London: Routledge, 1998. p 168-174.

HABERMAS, J. The structural transformation of the public sphere: an inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1991.

HORKHEIMER, M.; FLOWERMAN, S. Forward to studies in prejudice. In: LÖWENTHAL, L.; GUTERMAN, N. Prophets of deceit: a study of the techniques of the American agitator. New York: Harper & Bros, 1949. p. i-viii.

JANOWITZ, M. The techniques of propaganda for reaction: Gerald L. K. Smith’s radio speeches. Public Opinion Quarterly, Oxford, v. 8, n. 1, p 84-93, 1944. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/265669

KAY, J.; ZIEGELMUELLER, G.; MINCH, K. From Coughlin to contemporary, talk radio: fallacies and propaganda in American popular radio. Journal of Radio Studies, Abingdon, v. 5, n. 1, p. 9-21, 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19376529809384526

KLEIN, N. No is not enough: debating the new shock politics. London: Allen Lane, 2017.

KRACAUER, S. From Caligari to Hitler: a psychological history of the German film. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1947.

_______. The salaried masses: duty and distraction in Weimar Germany. London: Verso, 1998.

LÖWENTHAL, L.; GUTERMAN, N. Prophets of deceit: a study of the techniques of the American agitator. New York: Harper & Bros, 1949.

MCCHUNG LEE, A.; BRIANT-LEE, E. (Eds.). The fine art of propaganda: a study of father Coughlin’s speeches. New York: Harcourt-Brace, 1939.

MCGUIGAN, J. Cultural analysis. London: Sage, 2010.

MOFFITT, B.; TORMEY, S. Rethinking populism: politics, mediatisation and political style, Political Studies, Thousand Oaks, v. 62, n. 2, p. 381-397, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12032

NEUMANN, F. Behemoth: the structure and practice of National Socialism, 1933-1944. 2. ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1944.

NIGEL Farage’s “vile” anti-immigration poster criticised. The Irish Times, Dublin, 19 jun. 2016. Available at: <https://goo.gl/XG6bQD>. Access on: 26 jul. 2018.

Published
2018-08-29
How to Cite
Murdock, G. (2018). Refeudalisation revisited. MATRIZes, 12(2), 13-31. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1982-8160.v12i2p13-31
Section
Dossier