Extinction risk or lack of sampling in a threatened species: Genetic structure and environmental suitability of the neotropical frog Pristimantis penelopus (Anura: Craugastoridae)

Authors

  • Adriana Restrepo Universidad de Antioquia Instituto de Biología Grupo Herpetológico de Antioquia
  • Julian A. Velasco Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Facultad de Ciencias Departamento de Biología Evolutiva Museo de Zoología Alfonso L. Herrera
  • Juan M. Daza Universidad de Antioquia Instituto de Biología Grupo Herpetológico de Antioquia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/0031-1049.2017.57.01

Keywords:

Colombia, IUCN Red List, Niche modeling, Phylogeography, Terrarana.

Abstract

IUCN Red Lists have been a valuable tool to prioritize conservation plans in endemic neotropical frogs. However, many areas in this region are poorly known in terms of their diversity and endemism. Based on examined museum specimens of the threatened species Pristimantis penelopus we revised its geographic distribution and determined the habitat suitability using niche modeling techniques. Using a mitochondrial fragment of COI gene, we determine the phylogenetic position and the extent of the genetic variation across its distribution in Colombia. We present the first records of P. penelopus for the Cordillera Oriental, the western versant of Cordillera Occidental and the northern portion of the Cauca river basin. Based on the molecular phylogenetic analysis, Pristimantis penelopus belongs to the P. ridens series sensu Padial et al. (2014). The mean of intraspecific genetic variation is 2.1% and the variation among population ranges between 2.3 and 3.5%. The genetic distance between the western populations and the Magdalena Valley populations suggests a potential phylogeographic break in northwestern Antioquia. We expand the realized distribution by 258 kilometers north, 200 km east and 223 km northwest. Based on our results and according to the IUCN criteria we propose a new category for the species and highlight the need to increase the surveys in poorly known regions to better understand the geographic distribution and conservation status of listed species.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Juan M. Daza, Universidad de Antioquia Instituto de Biología Grupo Herpetológico de Antioquia

    Assistant Professor
    Biology Institute

References

Allouche, O.; Tsoar, A. & Kadmon, R. 2006. Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models: Prevalence, kappa and the true skill statistic (TSS). Journal of Applied Ecology, 43:1223‑1232. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01214.x

Bandelt, H.; Forster, P. & Röhl, A. 1999. Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 16:37‑48.

Bernal, M.H. & Lynch, J.D. 2008. Review and analysis of altitudinal distribution of the Andean anurans in Colombia. Zootaxa, 1826:1‑25. DOI: http://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.1826.1.1

Bonnet, E. & Van De Peer, Y. 2002. zt: A software tool for simple and partial Mantel tests. Journal of Statistical Software, 7:1‑12. DOI: http://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v007.i10

Boulenger, G.A. 1896. Descriptions of new reptiles and batrachians from Colombia. Annals and Magazine of Natural History Series, 6(17):16‑21.

Boulenger, G.A. 1898. An account of the reptiles and batrachians collected by Mr. W.F.H. Rosenberg in Western Ecuador. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 1898:107‑126.

Castro, F.; Herrera, M.I. & Lynch, J.D. 2004. Pristimantis penelopus. In: The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2004. Available from www.iucnredlist.org/details/56841/0. Accessed in: 10/2016.

Collar, N.J. 1996. The reasons for Red Data Books. Oryx, 30:121‑130. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1017/S003060530002105

Crawford, A.J.; Lips, K.R. & Bermingham, E. 2010. Epidemic disease decimates amphibian abundance, species diversity, and evolutionary history in the highlands of central Panama. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107:13777‑13782.

Drummond, A.J.; Suchard, M.A.; Xie, D. & Rambaut, A. 2012. Bayesian phylogenetics with BEAUti and the BEAST 1.7 Molecular Biology and Evolution, 29:1969‑1973. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mss075

Edgar, R.C. 2004. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Research, 32:1792‑1797. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkh340

ESRI. 2011. ArcGIS Desktop: Release 10. Available from Environmental Systems Research Institute. Redlands, USA.

Excoffier, L.; Smouse, P.E. & Quattro, J.M. 1992. Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics, 131:479‑491.

Frost, D.R. 2016. Amphibian species of the world: an online reference. Version 6.0. (Junuary 2017) Available from http://research.amnh.org/herpetology/amphibia/index.html. New York, American Museum of Natural History.

García‑R., J.C.; Crawford, A.J.; Mendoza, Á.M.; Ospina, O.; Cardenas, H. & Castro, F. 2012. Comparative phylogeography of direct-developing frogs (Anura: Craugastoridae: Pristimantis) in the southern Andes of Colombia. PLoS One, 7:e46077.

Ibáñez, R.; Jaramillo, C.A. & Arosemena, F.A. 1994. A new species of Eleutherodactylus (Anura: Leptodactylidae) from Panamá. Amphibia-Reptilia, 15:337‑341. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1163/156853894X00371

IUCN. 2001. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1. Gland and Cambridge, IUCN Species Survival Commission.

IUCN. 2016. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2016‑3. (January 2017). Available from www.iucnredlist.org.

Kearse, M.; Moir, R.; Wilson, A.; Stones-Havas, S.; Cheung, M.; Sturrock, S.; Buxton, S.; Cooper, A.; Markowitz, S.; Duran, C.; Thierer, T.; Ashton, B.; Meintjes, P. & Drummond, A. 2012. Geneious Basic: An integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics, 28:1647‑1649. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts199

Kumar, S.; Stecher, G. & Tamura, K. 2016. MEGA7: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis. Version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 33(7):1870‑1874.

Leigh, J. 2016. PopArt Version 1.7. Available from http://popart.otago.ac.nz.

Llano-Mejía, J.; Cortés-Gómez, A.M. & Castro-Herrera, F. 2010. Lista de anfibios y reptiles del departamento del Tolima, Colombia. Biota Colombiana, 11:89‑106.

Lynch, J.D. & Rueda-Almonacid, J.V. 1999. New species of frogs from low and moderate elevations from the Caldas transect of the eastern flank of the Cordillera Central. Revista de la Academia Colombiana de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales, 23:307‑314.

Meyer, C.P. 2003. Molecular systematics of cowries (Gastropoda: Cypraeidae) and diversification patterns in the tropics. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 79:401‑459. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1046/j.1095-8312.2003.00197.x

Minh, B.Q.; Nguyen, M.A.T. & von Haeseler, A. 2013. Ultrafast approximation for phylogenetic bootstrap. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 30:1188‑1195.

Naimi, B. & Araújo, M. 2016. sdm: a reproducible and extensible R platform for species distribution modeling. Ecography, 39:368‑375.

Nguyen, L.T.; Schmidt, H.A.; von Haeseler, A. & Minh, B.Q. 2015. IQ‑TREE: A fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum likelihood phylogenies. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 32:268‑274. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msu300

Padial, J.M.; Grant, T. & Frost, D. 2014. Molecular systematics of terraranas (Anura: Brachycephaloidea) with an assessment of the effects of alignment and optimality criteria. Zootaxa, 3825:1‑132. DOI: http://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3825.1.1

Peters, W.C.H. 1873. Über eine neue Schildrötenart, Cinosternon Effeldtii und einige andere neue oder weniger bekannte Amphibien. Monatsberichte der Königlichen Preussische Akademie des Wissenschaften zu Berlin, 1873:603‑618.

Pinto-Sánchez, N.R.; Crawford, A.J. & Wiens, J.J. 2014. Using historical biogeography to test for community saturation. Ecology Letters, 17:1077‑1085. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12310

Rivera-Correa, M. & Daza, J.M. 2016. Molecular phylogenetics of the Pristimanstis lacrimosus species group (Anura: Craugastoridae) with the description of a new species from Colombia. Acta Herpetologica, 11:31‑45. DOI: http://doi.org/10.13128/Acta_Herpetol-16434

Rodríguez, A.S.; Pilgrim, J.D.; Lamoreux, J.F.; Hoffmann, M. & Brooks, T.M. 2006. The value of the IUCN Red List for conservation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 21:71‑76. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2005.10.010

Stuart, S.N.; Hoffmann, M.; Chanson, J.; Cox, N.; Berridge, R.; Ramani, P. & Young, B. 2008. Threatened Amphibians of the World. Barcelona, Lynx Editions. 151p.

Wang, I.J. 2013. Examining the full effects of landscape heterogeneity on spatial genetic variation: A multiple matrix regression approach for quantifying geographic and ecological isolation. Evolution, 67:3403‑3411. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1111/evo.12134

Downloads

Published

2017-03-16

Issue

Section

Original Article

How to Cite

Restrepo, A., Velasco, J. A., & Daza, J. M. (2017). Extinction risk or lack of sampling in a threatened species: Genetic structure and environmental suitability of the neotropical frog Pristimantis penelopus (Anura: Craugastoridae). Papéis Avulsos De Zoologia, 57(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.11606/0031-1049.2017.57.01