Diet of Dendropsophus microcephalus and Scarthyla vigilans (Anura: Hylidae) at a locality in north-western Venezuela with notes on microhabitat occupation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/0031-1049.2017.57.07Keywords:
Diet, Generalist, Niche overlap, Resource partitioning, Microhabitat, Morphometry.Abstract
The coexistence of species with similar ecological requirements (food, space, time) has typically drawn attention of researchers because competition for resources is expected to be high. The diet and microhabitat occupation of two morphologically and ecologically similar species of Hylidae (Anura), Dendropsophus microcephalus and Scarthyla vigilans, were analyzed at a locality in north-western Venezuela, with the aim of addressing the potential for space and food competition between them. Diet was estimated through the analysis of stomach contents and microhabitat occupation was estimated through recordings of perch type, height and horizontal distance to water. Thirty-six prey categories (32 families, 4 orders) of arthropods were identified: 30 categories in D. microcephalus and 21 categories in S. vigilans. The most important prey (RII) in D. microcephalus were Agelenidae (11.1%), Tachinidae (9.32%) and Lepidoptera-larvae (7.96%). Gryllidae (14.13%), Cicadidae (9.1%), Cicadellidae (8.3%) and Delphacidae (8.02%) were the most important in S. vigilans. Diet overlap was relatively low (0.32). Both species have relatively generalist diets. Both species occupied the same type of perches (leaves and stems of Dicotyledons and Monocotyledons) and heights (average: S. vigilans, 24 ± 16.2 cm; D. microcephalus, 22.7 ± 9.5 cm). The potential for space competition is high if perches are limited and food competition is expected to be low.
Downloads
References
Aiken, M. & Coyle, F.A. 2000. Habitat distribution, life history and behaviour of Tetragnatha spider species in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Journal of Arachnology, 28:97‑106.
Alatalo, R.V. 1981. Problems in the measurement of evenness in ecology. Oikos, 37:199‑204.
Anderson, A.; Haukos, D. & Anderson, J. 1999. Diet composition of three anurans from the Playa wetlands of northwest Texas. Copeia, 1999:515‑520.
Armesto, O.; Esteban, B. & Torrado, R. 2009. Fauna de anfibios del Municipio de Cúcuta, Norte de Santander, Colombia. Herpetotropicos, 5:57‑63.
Barrio-Amorós, C.L. 1998. Sistemática y biogeografía de los anfibios (Amphibia) de Venezuela. Acta Biologica Venezuelica, 18:1‑93.
Barrio-Amorós, C.L. 2009. Riqueza y Endemismo. In: Molina, C.; Señaris, J.C.; Lampo, M. & Rial, A. (Eds.). Anfibios de Venezuela; Estado del conocimiento y recomendaciones para su conservación. Caracas, Ediciones Grupo TEI. p. 25‑39.
Barrio-Amorós, C.L.; Díaz de Pascual, A.; Mueses-Cisneros, J.; Infante, E. & Chacón, E. 2006. Hyla vigilans, Solano, 1971, a second species of the genus Scarthyla, redescription and distribution in Venezuela y Colombia. Zootaxa, 1349:1‑18.
Bevier, C.R. 1997. Breeding activity and chorus tenure of two neotropical hylids frogs. Journal of Herpetology, 32:607‑611.
Bolaños, F.; Santos-Barrera, G.; Solís, F.; Ibáñez, R.; Wilson, L.D.; Savage, J.; Lee, J.; Trefaut Rodrigues, M.; Caramaschi, U.; Mijares, A. & Hardy, J. 2008. Dendropsophus microcephalus. In: The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2008: e.T55558A11318242. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2008.RLTS.T55558A11318242.en. Downloaded on 02/02/2017.
Caldwell, J.P. 1996. The evolution of myrmecophagy and its correlates in poison frogs (Family Dendrobatidae). Journal of Zoology, London, 240:75‑101.
Caldwell, J.P. & Vitt, L.J. 1999. Dietary asymmetry in leaf litter frogs and lizards in a transitional northern Amazonian rain forest. Oikos, 84:383‑397.
Candia, R. 1997. Cambios en la estructuración de la comunidad de insectos asociados a una sucesión secundaria en la sabana natural del Parque Nacional Aguaro-Guariquito (Edo. Guárico). Doctoral Diss., Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Central de Venezuela, Caracas.
Cardoso, A.J.; Andrade, G.V. & Haddad, C.F.B. 1989. Distribuição espacial em comunidades de anfíbios (Anura) no sudeste do Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Biologia, 49:241‑249.
Christian, K.A. 1982. Change in the food niche during postmetamorphic ontogeny of the frog Pseudacris triseriata. Copeia, 1982:73‑80.
Cope, E.D. 1886. Thirteenth contribution to the herpetology of tropical America. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 23:271‑287.
Crump, M.L. 1974. Reproductive strategies in a tropical anuran community. Miscellaneous Publications of the Museum of Natural History, University of Kansas, Lawrence, 61:1‑68.
Donnelly, M.A. 1991. Feeding patterns of the strawberry poison frog Dendrobates pumilio (Anura: Dendrobatidae). Copeia, 1991:723‑730.
Drewry, G.E. & Rand, A.S. 1983. Characteristics of an acoustic community: Puerto Rican frogs of the genus Eleutherodactylus. Copeia, 1983:941‑955.
Duellman, W.E. 1970. The Hylid frogs of Middle America. Kansas, Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptile. 2v. (Monograph of the Museum of Natural History, the University of Kansas).
Duellman, W.E. 1993. Amphibians in Africa and South America: evolutionary history and ecological comparisons. In: Goldblatt, P. (Ed.). Biological relationship between Africa and South America. Yale University Press. p. 200‑243.
Duellman, W.E. & Trueb, L. 1994. Biology of Amphibians. Baltimore, The John Hopkins University Press.
Duré, M. & Kehr, A. 2001. Differential exploitation of trophic resources by two pseudid frogs from Corrientes, Argentina. Journal of Herpetology, 35:340‑343.
Emerson, S.B. 1985. Skull shape in frogs, correlations with diet. Herpetologica, 41:177‑188.
Freed, A.N. 1980. Prey selection and feeding behavior in the green treefrog (Hyla cinerea). Ecology, 61:461‑465.
Giller, P.S. 1984. Community Structure and the Niche. London, Chapman and Hal.
Gordon, C.E. 2000. The coexistence of species. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural, 73:175‑198.
Hammer, O.; Harper, D. & Ryan, P. 2001. PAST: Paleontological statistics package for education and data analysis. Palaeontological Electronics, 4:9.
Hirai, T. & Matsui, M. 2000. Myrmecophagy in a ranid frog Rana rugose: specialization or weak avoidance to ant eating. Zoology Science, 17:459‑466.
Hurlbert, S.H. 1978. The measurement of niche overlap and some relatives. Ecology, 59:67‑77.
Hutchenson, K. 1970. A test for comparing diversities based on the Shannon formula. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 29:151‑154.
Jiménez, R. & Bolaños, F. 2012. Use of food and spatial resources by two frogs of the genus Dendropsophus (Anura: Hylidae) from La Selva, Costa Rica. Phyllomedusa, 11:51‑62
Krebs, C.J. 1999. Ecological Methodology. California, Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers, Inc. Benjamin/Cummings.
La Marca, E.; Rueda J.V. & Castro, F. 2004. Scarthyla vigilans. In: The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2004: e.T55688A11340990. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2004.RLTS.T55688A11340990.en. Downloaded on: 02/02/2017.
Labanick, G.M. 1976. Prey availability, consumption and selection in the cricket frog, Acris crepitans (Amphibia, Anura: Hylidae). Journal of Herpetology, 10:293‑298.
Levins, R. 1968. Evolution in Changing Environments: Some Theoretical Explorations. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.
Lima, A.P. 1998. The effects of size on the diets of six sympatric species of postmetamorphic litter anurans in Central Amazonia. Journal of Herpetology, 32:392‑399.
Lima, A.P. & Magnusson, W.E. 1998. Partitioning seasonal time: interaction among size, foraging activity and diet in leaflitter frogs. Oecología, 116:259‑266.
Lima, A.P. & Moreira, G. 1993. Effects of prey size and foraging mode on the ontogenetic change in feeding niche of Colostethus stepheni (Anura: Dendrobatidae). Oecología, 95:93‑102.
Lomolino, M.; Riddle, B.R. & Brown, J.H. 2006. Biogeography. 3.ed. Sunderland, Sinauer Associates.
Lotzkat, S. 2007. Taxonomía y zoogeografía de la herpetofauna del Macizo de Nirgua, Venezuela. Undergraduate Diss., Biological Sciences Department, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main.
Lynch, J.D. & Duellman, W.E. 1997. Frogs of the genus Eleutherodactylus (Leptodactilydae) in western Ecuador: systematics, ecology and biogeography. University of Kansas, Museum of Natural History, Special Publications, 23:1‑236.
Macale, D.; Vignoli, L. & Carpaneto, G.M. 2008. Food selection strategy during the reproductive period in three syntopic hylid species from a subtropical wetland of north-east Argentina. Herpetological Journal, 18:49‑58.
Menéndez-Guerrero, P.A. 2001. Ecología trófica de una comunidad de anuros del Parque Nacional Yasuní en la Amazonía Ecuatoriana. Undergraduate Diss., Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Quito.
Menin, M.; Rossa-Feres, D. & Giaretta, A. 2005. Resource use and coexistence of two syntopic hylid frogs (Anura: Hylidae). Revista Brasileria de Zoologia, 22:61‑72.
Muñoz-Guerrero, J.; Serrano, V. & Ramírez-Pinilla, M.P. 2007. Uso del microhábitat, dieta y tiempo de actividad en cuatro especies simpátricas de ranas hílidas neotropicales (Anura: Hylinae). Caldasia, 29:413‑425.
Parmelee, J.R. 1999. Trophic ecology of a tropical anuran assemblage. Scientific Papers of the Natural History Museum of the University of Kansas, 11:1‑59.
Pianka, E.R. 1994. Evolutionary Ecology. New York, Harper Collins College Publishers.
Piñero, J. & Durant, P. 1993. Dieta de una comunidad de anuros de la selva nublada en los Andes Merideños. Ecotropicos, 6:1‑9.
Rojas-Runjaic, F.J.M.; Barrio-Amorós, C.L.; Molina, C.; Señaris, J.C. & Fedón, I.C. 2008. Notes on geographic distribution. Amphibia, Anura, Hylidae, Scarthyla vigilans: Range extensions and new states records from Delta Amacuro and Miranda states, Venezuela. Check List, 4:301‑303.
da Rosa, I.; Canavero, A.; Maneyro, R.; Naya, D.E. & Camargo, A. 2002. Diet of four sympatric anuran species in a temperate environment. Boletín de la Sociedad de Biología de Uruguay, 13:12‑20.
Runemark, A.; Perera, F.; Carrero, J.C.; Camacho Agüero, L.A.; Medina, R.; Jiménez, R.; Hernández, V.; De Los Llanos, V. & Urrutia-Guada, V. 2005. Proyecto para el establecimiento de la Reserva Natural La Guáquira en el Cerro Zapatero, Estado Yaracuy. Sartenejas, Universidad Simón Bolívar, Departamento de Estudios Ambientales.
Ryan MJ. 1985. The Túngara Frog. A Study of Sexual Selection and Communication. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Savage, J.M. 2002. The Amphibians and Reptiles of Costa Rica. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Schoener, T.W. 1974. Some methods of calculating competition coefficients from resource-utilization spectra. American Nauralist, 108:332‑340.
Smith, J.M.; Downie, J.R.; Dye, R.F.; Ogilvy, V.; Thornham, D.G.; Rutherford, M.G.; Charles, S.P. & Murphy, J.C. 2011. Amphibia, Anura, Hylidae Scarthyla vigilans (Solano, 1971): Range extension and new country record for Trinidad, West Indies, with notes on tadpoles, habitat, behavior and biogeographical significance. Check List, 7:574‑577.
Smith, R. & Silva, G. 1970. Claves para Artrópodos Terrestres Latinoamericanos. Barquisimeto, Instituto Pedagógico de Ciencias Experimentales.
Solano, H. 1971. Una nueva especie del género Hyla (Amphibia: Anura) de Venezuela. Acta Biologica Venezuelica, 7:211‑218.
Solé, M. & Pelz, B. 2007. Do male tree frogs feed during the breeding season? Stomach flushing of five syntopic hylids species in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Journal of Natural History, 41:41‑44.
Stebbins, R.C. & Cohen, N.W. 1995. A Natural History of Amphibians. New Jersey, Princeton University Press.
Strussmann, C.; Ribeiro do Vale, M.B.; Meneghini, M.H. & Magnusson, W.E. 1984. Diet and foraging mode of Bufo marinus and Leptodactylus ocellatus. Journal of Herpetology, 18:138‑146.
Tárano, Z. 2010. Advertisement calls and calling habits of frogs from a flooded savanna of Venezuela. South American Journal of Herpetology, 5:54‑75.
Toft, C. 1980a. Feeding ecology of thirteen syntopic species of anurans in a seasonal tropical environment. Oecología, 45:131‑141.
Toft, C. 1980b. Seasonal variation in populations of Panamanian litters frogs and their prey: a comparison of wetter and drier sites. Oecología, 47:34‑38.
Toft, C. 1981. Feeding ecology of Panamanian litter anurans: patterns in diet and foraging mode. Journal of Herpetology, 15:139‑144.
Toft, C. 1985. Resource partitioning in amphibians and reptiles. Copeia, 1985:1‑21.
Van Sluys, M. & Rocha, C.F. 1998. Feeding habits and microhabitat utilization by two syntopic Brazilian Amazonian frogs (Hyla minuta and Pseudopaludicola sp.). Revista Brasileira de Zoologia, 58:559‑562.
Vignoli, L. & Luiselli, L. 2011. Dietary relationships among coexisting anuran amphibians: a worldwide quantitative review. Oecología, 169:499‑509.
Vitt, L.J. 1991. Ecology and life history of the scansorial arboreal lizard Plica plica (Iguanidae) in Amazonian Brazil. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 69:504‑511.
Whitney, C.L. & Krebs, J.R. 1975. Spacing and calling in Pacific tree frogs, Hyla regila. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 53:1519‑1527.
Wiggins, D.A. 1992. Foraging success of leopard frogs (Rana pipiens). Journal of Herpetology, 26:87‑88.
Wilczynski, W. & Brenowitz, E.A. 1988. Acoustic cues mediate inter-male spacing in a neotropical frog. Animal Behaviour, 36:1054‑1063.
Woolbright, L.L. & Stewart, M.M. 1987. Foraging success of the tropical frog Eleutherodactylus coqui: the cost of calling. Copeia, 1987:69‑75.
Zar, J.H. 1999. Biostatistical Analysis. New Jersey, Prentice Hall.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Responsibility: The scientific content and the opinions expressed in the manuscript are the sole responsibility of the author(s).
Copyrights: Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia. The journal is licensed under a Creative Commons attribution-type CC-BY.
