Analysis of possible factors of vocal interference during the teaching activity

Authors

  • Bárbara Gabriela Silva Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina. Departamento de Fisioterapia, Fonoaudiologia e Terapia Ocupacional
  • Tiago Visacre Chammas Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina. Departamento de Fisioterapia, Fonoaudiologia e Terapia Ocupacional
  • Marcia Simões Zenari Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina. Departamento de Fisioterapia, Fonoaudiologia e Terapia Ocupacional
  • Renata Rodrigues Moreira Universidade de São Paulo. Hospital Universitário
  • Alessandra Giannella Samelli Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina. Departamento de Fisioterapia, Fonoaudiologia e Terapia Ocupacional
  • Kátia Nemr Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina. Departamento de Fisioterapia, Fonoaudiologia e Terapia Ocupacional

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/S1518-8787.2017051000092

Keywords:

School Teachers. Voice Disorders, epidemiology. Noise, adverse effects. Hearing Loss. Risk Factors. Working Conditions.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To measure the risk of dysphonia in teachers, as well as investigate whether the perceptual-auditory and acoustic aspects of the voice of teachers in situations of silence and noise, the signal-to-noise ratio, and the noise levels in the classroom are associated with the presence of dysphonia. METHODS: This is an observational cross-sectional research with 23 primary and secondary school teachers from a private school in the municipality of São Paulo, Brazil, divided into the groups without dysphonia and with dysphonia. We performed the following procedures: general Dysphonia Risk Screening Protocol (General-DRSP) and complementary to speaking voice–teacher (Specific-DRSP), voice recording during class and in an individual situation in a silent room, and measurement of the signal-to-noise ratio and noise levels of classrooms. RESULTS: We have found differences between groups regarding physical activity (General-DRSP) and particularities of the profession (Specific-DRSP), as well as in all aspects of the perceptualauditory vocal analysis. We have found signs of voice wear in the group without dysphonia. Regarding the vocal resources in the situations of noise and silence, we have identified a difference for the production of abrupt vocal attack and the tendency of a more precise speech in the situation of noise. Both the signal-to-noise ratio and the room noise levels during class were high in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Teachers in both groups are at high risk for developing dysphonia and have negative vocal signals to a greater or lesser extent. Signal-to-noise ratio was inadequate in most classrooms, considering the standards for both children with normal hearing and with hearing loss, as well as equivalent noise levels.

Published

2017-12-04

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

Silva, B. G., Chammas, T. V., Zenari, M. S., Moreira, R. R., Samelli, A. G., & Nemr, K. (2017). Analysis of possible factors of vocal interference during the teaching activity. Revista De Saúde Pública, 51, 124. https://doi.org/10.11606/S1518-8787.2017051000092