Performance of two honey bee subspecies during harsh weather and Acacia gerrardii nectar-rich flow

Authors

  • Awad Mohamed Awad King Saud University; College of Food and Agriculture Sciences; Dept. of Plant Protection
  • Ayman Ahmad Owayss King Saud University; College of Food and Agriculture Sciences; Dept. of Plant Protection
  • Abdulaziz Saad Alqarni King Saud University; College of Food and Agriculture Sciences; Dept. of Plant Protection

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-992x-2016-0101

Keywords:

Apis mellifera jemenitica, bee forage, beekeeping, colony strengths subtropical

Abstract

Both climatic factors and bee forage characteristics affect the population size and productivity of honey bee colonies. To our knowledge, no scientific investigation has as yet considered the potential effect of nectar-rich bee forage exposed to drastic subtropical weather conditions on the performance of honey bee colonies. This study investigated the performance of the honey bee subspecies Apis mellifera jemenitica Ruttner (Yemeni) and Apis mellifera carnica Pollmann (Carniolan) in weather that was hot and dry and in an environment of nectar-rich flora. The brood production, food storage, bee population and honey yield of Yemeni (native) and Carniolan (imported) colonies on Talh trees (Acacia gerrardii Benth.), a nectar-rich, subtropical, and summer bee forage source in Central Arabia were evaluated. Owing to their structural and behavioral adaptations, the Yemeni bees constructed stronger (high population size) colonies than the Carniolan bees. Although both groups yielded similar amounts of Talh honey, the Yemeni bees consumed their stored honey rapidly if not timely harvested. A. m. jemenitica has a higher performance than A. m. carnica during extremely hot-dry conditions and A. gerrardii nectar-rich flow.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2017-12-01

Issue

Section

Entomology

How to Cite

Performance of two honey bee subspecies during harsh weather and Acacia gerrardii nectar-rich flow. (2017). Scientia Agricola, 74(6), 474-480. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-992x-2016-0101