Direito e teoria social: três problemas

Autores

  • Gunther Teubner Universidade Johann Wolfgang Goethe de Frankfurt

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-2070201524

Resumo

Três desastres da teoria são a razão de a doutrina jurídica que, particularmente na Alemanha no início do século XX, havia desenvolvido uma estreita simbiose de direito e teoria social ter imunizado a si mesma contra a influência desta última. A alternativa para essa autoimunização é uma abordagem distanciada, segundo a qual o direito não toma teorias sociais em seu valor nominal, mas gera, em um complexo processo de tradução, valor agregado à doutrina jurídica. O artigo lida com três problemas na relação entre direito e teoria social. Primeiro, a concorrência entre as teorias: como o direito deve fazer uma seleção se teorias sociais concorrentes dão origem a análises mutuamente incompatíveis de fenômenos sociais? Em seguida, a transferência de conhecimento: os resultados das teorias sociais podem ser aplicados diretamente no âmbito do direito? As teorias sociais podem orientar a seleção das regras e sanções legais? Por fim, há a questão extremamente difícil da normatividade das teorias sociais: critérios normativos para a prática jurídica podem ser derivados de teorias sociais? O artigo usa como exemplo o problema dos efeitos horizontais de direitos constitucionais em redes semiprivadas de pesquisa médica.

Downloads

Os dados de download ainda não estão disponíveis.

Referências

Albert, Hans. (1993), Rechtswissenschaft als Realwissenschaft: das Recht als soziale Tatsache und die Aufgabe der Jurisprudenz. Baden-Baden, Nomos.

Amstutz, Marc. (2009), “The constitution of contractual networks”. In: Amstutz, Marc & Teubner, Gunther (orgs.). Contractual networks: legal issues of multilateral cooperation. Oxford, Hart, pp. 309-346.

______. (2013), “The nemesis of European private law: contractual nexus as a legislative conundrum”. In: Grundmann, Stefan; Cafaggi, Fabrizio & Vettori, Giuseppe (orgs.). The organizational contract: from exchange to long-term network cooperation in European contract law. Londres, Ashgate, pp. 319-356.

Amstutz, Marc (1993). Konzernorganisationsrecht: Ordnungsfunktion, Normstruktur, Rechtssystematik. Bern, Stämpfli.

Applegate, William; Furberg, Curt; Grimm, Richard & Byington, Robert. (1996), “The Multicenter Isradipine Diuretic Atherosclerosis Study (midas)”. Journal of the American Medical Association, 277: 297-298.

Augsberg, Ino. (2014), Informationsverwaltungsrecht: zur kognitiven Dimension der rechtlichen Steuerung von Verwaltungsentscheidungen. Tübingen, Mohr Siebeck.

Brodocz, André & Schaal, Gary. (2009), Politische Theorien der Gegenwart. Stuttgart, Opladen.

Brown, George Spencer. (1972), Laws of form. Nova York, Crown.

Butler, Brian E. (2011), “Law and economics, internet encyclopedia of philosophy”. Disponível em www.iep.utm.edu/law-econ.

Castells, Manuel (2000). The rise of the network society. Oxford, Wiley.

Cafaggi, Fabrizio. (2011), “Introduction”. In: ______ (org.). Contractual networks, inter-firm cooperation and economic growth. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.

Cohen, Felix S. (1935), “Transcendental nonsense and the functional approach”. Columbia Law Review, 35: 809-849.

Dahrendorf, Ralf. (1958), Homo sociologicus: Ein Versuch zur Geschichte, Bedeutung und Kritik der sozialen Rolle. Stuttgart, Opladen.

De Angelis, C.; Drazen, J. M.; Frizelle, F. A. et al. (2004), “Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors”. The New England Journal of Medicine, 351: 1250-1251.

Drygala, Tim. (2013), “Europäisches Konzernrecht: Gruppeninteresse und Related Party Transactions”. Die Aktiengesellschaft, 16: 198-210.

Eidenmüller, Horst. (1995), Effizienz als Rechtsprinzip. Tübingen, Mohr Siebeck.

Emmerich, Volker & Habersack, Mathias. (2013), Aktien- und GmbH-Konzernrecht-Kommentar. Munique, C. H. Beck.

Eyding, Dirk et al. (2010), “Reboxetine for acute treatment of major depression: systematic review and meta-analysis of published and unpublished placebo and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor controlled trials”. bmj, 341: c4737.

Francot-Timmermans, Lyana & Christodoulidis, Emilios A. (2011), “The normative turn in Teubner’s systems theory of law”. Rechtsfilosofie & Rechtstheorie, 40: 187-190.

Fuller, Lon. (1983), Principles of social order: selected essays of Lon L. Fuller. Durham, Hart.

Gómez, Fernando. (2011), “Cooperation, long-term relationships and open-endedness in contractual networks”. In: Cafaggi, Fabrizio (org.). Contractual Networks, Inter-Firm Cooperation and Economic Growth. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.

Gordley, James. (2008), “The State’s private law and legal academia”. In: Jansen, Nils & Michaels, Ralf (orgs.). Beyond the State: rethinking private law. Tübingen, Mohr Siebeck, pp. 219-232.

Grundmann, Stefan. (2008), “Vertragsnetz und Wegfall der Geschäftsgrundlage”. In: Aderhold, Lutz; Grunewald, Barbara; Klingberg, Dietgard & Paefgen, Walter G. (orgs.). Festschrift für Harm Peter Westermann zum 70. Geburtstag. Colônia,

Dr. Otto Schmidt, pp. 227-244.

______. (2011), “Contractual networks in German private law”. In: cafaggi, Fabrizio (org.). Contractual networks, inter-firm cooperation and economic growth. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, pp. 111-162.

Günther, Gotthard. (1976), “Life as poly-contexturality”. In: ______. Beiträge zur Grundlegung einer operationsfähigen Dialektik I. Hamburgo, Meiner, pp. 283-306.

Habermas, Jürgen. (1963), Theorie und Praxis: Sozialphilosophische Studien. Frankfurt, Suhrkamp.

______. (1996), Between facts and norms: contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. Cambridge, The mit Press.

Hart, Herbert L. A. (1981), The concept of law. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Hauriou, Maurice. ([1933]1986), “La théorie de l’institution et de la fondation: essai de vitalisme social”. In: ______. Aux sources du droit. Caen, Centre de Philosophie Politique et Juridique, pp. 89-128.

Hensel, Isabell. (2009), “Grundrechtskollisionen in der Stiftungsuniversität: Überwältigte Einheit oder organisierte Vielfalt”. In: Calliess, Gralf-Peter; Fischer-Lescano, Andreas; Wielsch, Dan & Zumbansen, Peer (orgs.). Soziologische Jurisprudenz:

Festschrift für Gunther Teubner zum 65. Geburtstag. Berlim, Gruyter Recht.

Herberg, Martin. (2011), “Bringing professions back in: a fresh look at the dynamics of institution-building in (world) society”. In: Joerges, Christian & Falke, Josef (orgs.). Karl Polanyi, globalisation and the potential of law in transnational markets. Oxford, Hart, pp. 107-129.

Hoffmann-Becking, Michael. (2012), “Gibt es das Konzerninteresse?”. In: Erle, Bernd et al. (orgs.). Festschrift für Peter Hommelhoff. Colônia, Dr. Otto Schmidt, pp. 433-446.

Kelsen, Hans. (1990), General theory of norms. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Kennedy, Duncan. (1975), “Form and Substance in Private Law”. Harvard Law Review, 89: 1685-1697.

King, Ralph T. (1996), “Bitter pill: how a drug firm paid for university study, then undermined it”. The Wall Street Journal, 12 abr., p. 6.

Ladeur, Karl-Heinz. (2006), Der Staat gegen die Gesellschaft: Zur Verteidigung der Rationalität der “Privatrechtsgesellschaft”. Tübingen, Mohr Siebeck.

Lange, Knut Werner. (1998), Das Recht der Netzwerke. Heidelberg, Fachmedien Recht und Wirtschaft.

Lautmann, Rüdiger. (1971), Soziologie vor den Toren der Jurisprudenz: Zur Kooperation der beiden Disziplinen. Stuttgart, Kohlhammer.

Lazear, Edward P. (2000), “Economic imperialism”. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115 (1): 99-146.

Luhmann, Niklas. (1990), Die Wissenschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt, Suhrkamp.

______. (1990), Political theory in the welfare State. Berlim, Walter de Gruyter.

______. (1992a), “Some problems with reflexive law”. In: Febbrajo, Alberto & Teubner, Gunther (orgs.). State, law, and economy as autopoietic systems: regulation and autonomy in a new perspective. Milão, Giuffrè, pp. 389-415.

______. (1992b), “The coding of the legal system”. In: Febbrajo, Alberto & Teubner, Gunther (orgs.). State, law, and economy as autopoietic systems: regulation and autonomy in a new perspective. Milão, Giuffrè, pp. 145-185.

______. (2004), Law as a social system. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Lyotard, Jean-Francois. (1987), The differend: phrases in dispute. Manchester, University of Minnesota Press.

Maunz, Theodor & Dürig, Günter (orgs.). (2013), Grundgesetz: Kommentar. Munique, C. H. Beck, vol. supl. 68.

Mead, George Herbert. (1967), Mind, self and society from the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.

Mölders, Marc. (2012), “Kluge Kombinationen”. Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie, 33: 5-30.

Nonet, Philippe & Selznick, Philip. (1978), Law and society in transition: toward responsive law. Nova York, Harper and Row.

Orts, Eric W. (2013), Business persons: a legal theory of the firm. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Pies, Ingo & Leschke, Martin. (1998), Gary Beckers ökonomischer Imperialismus. Tübingen, Mohr Siebeck.

Posner, Richard A. (1987), “The decline of law as an autonomous discipline: 1982-1987”. Harvard Law Review, 100: 761-780.

Powell, Walter W. (1990), “Neither market nor hierarchy: network forms of organization”. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12: 295-336.

Rohe, Mathias. (1998), Netzverträge: Rechtsprobleme komplexer Vertragsverbindungen. Tübingen, Mohr Siebeck.

Röhl, Klaus F. & Röhl Hans C. (2008), Allgemeine Rechtslehre: Ein Lehrbuch. Colônia, Vahlen.

Rüthers, Bernd. (2004), Die unbegrenzte Auslegung: Zum Wandel der Privatrechtsordnung im Nationalsozialismus. Tübingen, Mohr Siebeck.

Savigny, Friedrich Carl von. (1840), System des heutigen römischen Rechts. Berlim, Veit, vol. 2.

Schimank, Uwe Schimank. (1996), Theorien gesellschaftlicher Differenzierung. Opladen, VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

Schluchter, Wolfgang. (1988), Religion und Lebensführung. Frankfurt, Suhrkamp, vol. 1.

Schott, Gisela Schott et al. (2010), “Finanzierung von Arzneimittelstudien durch.

pharmazeutische Unternehmen und die Folgen”. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International, 107 (16): 279-285 [parte 1] e pp. 295-301 [parte 2].

Song, Fujian; Hooper, Lee & Loke, Yoon K. (2013), “Publication bias: what is it? How do we measure it? How do we avoid it?”. Open Access Journal of Clinical Trials, 5: 71-81.

Song, Fujian; Parekh, Sheetal & Hooper, Lee. (2010), “Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases”. Health Technology Assessment, 14 (8): 1-220.

steinhauer, Fabian. (2009), Bildregeln: Studien zum juristischen Bilderstreit. Munique, Wilhelm Fink.

Stolleis, Michael. (2009), Sozialistische Gesetzlichkeit. Staats- und Verwaltungsrechtswissenschaft in der ddr. Munique, C. H. Beck.

Stolleis, Michael & Dunlap, Thomas. (2004), A history of public law in Germany 1914-1945. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Teles, Steven M. (2008), The rise of the conservative legal movement: the battle for control of the law. Princeton, Princeton University Press.

Teubner, Gunther. (1997). “Altera pars audiatur: law in the collision of discourses”. In: Rawlings, Richard (org.). Law, society and economy. Oxford, Clarendon Press, pp. 149-176.

______. (2000), “Contracting worlds: invoking discourse rights in private governance regimes”. Social and Legal Studies, 9: 399-417.

______. (2009), “Coincidentia oppositorum: hybrid networks beyond contract and organization”. In: Amstutz, Marc Amstutz & Teubner, Gunther (orgs.). Contractual networks: legal issues of multilateral cooperation. Oxford, Hart Publishing, pp. 3-30.

______. (2011), Networks as connected contracts. Oxford, Hart.

______. (2013), “‘And if I by Beelzebub cast out Devils, …’: An essay on the diabolics of network failure”. In: Grundmann, Stefan; Cafaggi, Fabrizio & Vettori, Giuseppe (orgs.). The organizational contract: from exchange to long-term network

cooperation in european contract law. Londres, Ashgate, pp. 113-135.

______. (2014), “Exogenous self-binding: how social systems externalise their foundational paradox”. In: Corsi, Giancarlo & Febbrajo, Alberto (orgs.). Transconstitutionalism. Farnham, Ashgate.

Thornhill, Chris. (2013), “A sociology of constituent power: the political code of transnational societal constitutions”. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 20:551-603.

Varela, Francisco J. (1992), “Whence perceptual meaning? A cartography of current ideas”. In: Varela, Francisco J. & Dupuy, Jean-Pierre (orgs.). Understanding origins: contemporary views on the origin of life, mind and society. Dordrecht, Springer.

Vesting, Thomas. (2007), Rechtstheorie: ein Studienbuch. Munique, C. H. Beck.

Weber, Max. (1968), Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre. Tübingen, Mohr Siebeck.

Weinberg, Alvin M. (1972), “Science and trans-science”. Minerva, 10: 209-222.

Weitzenboeck Emily M. (2012), A legal framework for emerging business models: dynamic networks as collaborative contracts. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.

Weyer, Johannes. (2011), Soziale Netzwerke: Konzepte und Methoden der sozialwissenschaftlichen Netzwerkforschung. Munique, Oldenbourg.

Welsch, Wolfgang. (1996), Vernunft: die zeitgenössische Vernunftkritik und das Konzept der transversalen Vernunft. Frankfurt, Suhrkamp.

Wieacker, Franz. (1996), A history of private law in Europe: with particular reference to Germany. Cambridge, Oxford University Press.

Wielsch, Dan. (2008), Zugangsregeln: Die Rechtsverfassung der Wissensteilung. Tübingen, Mohr Siebeck.

______. (2009), “Die epistemische Analyse des Rechts: Von der ökonomischen zur ökologischen Rationalität in der Rechtswissenschaft”. Juristenzeitung, 2: 67-77.

Wiethölter, Rudolf. (1968), Rechtswissenschaft. Frankfurt, Fischer.

______. (1995), “Zur Argumentation im Recht: Entscheidungsfolgen als Rechtsgründe?”. In: Teubner, Gunther (org.). Entscheidungsfolgen als Rechtsgründe: Folgenorientiertes Argumentieren in rechtsvergleichender Sicht. Baden-Baden, Nomos, pp. 89-120.

Williamson, Oliver E. (1985), The economic institutions of capitalism: firms, markets, relational contracting. Nova York, Free Press.

______. (1991), “Comparative economic organization: the analysis of discrete structural alternatives”. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36: 269-296.

Zöllner, Wolfgang. (1996), “Regelungsspielräume im Schuldvertragsrecht: Bemerkungen zur Grundrechtsanwendung im Privatrecht und zu den sogenannten Ungleichgewichtslagen”. Archiv für die civilistische Praxis, 196.

Downloads

Publicado

2015-12-01

Edição

Seção

Dossiê - Teoria dos Sistemas e Crítica da Sociedade

Como Citar

Direito e teoria social: três problemas . (2015). Tempo Social, 27(2), 75-101. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-2070201524