La polarización de “La Manada”: el debate público en España y los riesgos de la comunicación política digital
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/0103-2070.ts.2019.159680Palavras-chave:
Polarização digital, Redes sociais on-line, “La Manada”, Twitter, Comunicação políticaResumo
Diversos autores han planteado en los últimos años que el nuevo escenario que genera la comunicación digital provoca que los ciudadanos tengan un papel con mayor protagonismo en el debate público. Sin embargo, al margen de las múltiples oportunidades políticas y comunicativas surgidas de tras la irrupción de las redes sociales digitales, encontramos algunos riesgos y limitaciones relevantes para la comunicación política como la falta de civismo (Incivility). El objetivo de esta investigación es analizar, a través del estudio del caso de “La manada” (de gran repercusión social y política en España) y haciendo uso de técnicas de Big data, la posible polarización de debate público en la red social Twitter y la existencia de este tipo de prácticas negativas, en especial, cuando afectan a las mujeres. Encontramos un escenario de una extrema polarización en el que ambas partes tienden a usar el tema de debate como pretexto para reforzar las posiciones que separan a la izquierda y la derecha en España.
Downloads
Referências
Adamic, L. A. & Glance, N. (2005), “The political blogosphere and the 2004 us election: divided they blog”. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on Link discovery. Nova York, acm, pp. 36-43.
Benkler, Y. & Nissenbaum, H. (2006), “Commons‐based peer production and virtue”. Journal of Political Philosophy, 14 (4): 394-419.
Bennett, W. L. & Segerberg, A. (2013), The logic of connective action: digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Nova York, Cambridge University Press.
Borondo, J.; Morales, A. J.; Losada, J. C. & Benito, R. M. (2012), “Characterizing and modeling an electoral campaign in the context of Twitter: 2011 Spanish presidential election as a case study”. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 22 (2): 123-138.
Boxell, L.; Gentzkow, M. & Shapiro, J. M. (2017), Is the internet causing political polarization? Evidence from demographics. Washington, National Bureau of Economic Research.
Caldarelli, G.; Chessa, A.; Pammolli, F.; Pompa, G.; Puliga, M.; Riccaboni, M. & Riotta, G. (2014), “A multi-level geographical study of Italian political elections from Twitter data”. PloS One, 9 (5): 95-104. Disponible en https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095809.
Cárdenas, J. P.; Vidal, G.; Urbina, C.; Olivares, G.; Rodrigo, P. & Fuentes, M. (2018), “Research article social crises: signatures of complexity in a fast-growing economy”. Complexity, 1:11-22.
Castells, M. (2009), Comunicación y poder. Madrid, Alianza.
Citron, D. K. (2009), “Cyber civil rights”. Bul Rev., 89: 61-77.
Gentzkow, M. (2016), Polarization in 2016. Toulouse Network of Information Technology White Paper.
Gervais, B. T. (2015), “Incivility online: affective and behavioral reactions to uncivil political posts in a web-based experiment”. Journal of Information Technology y Politics, 12 (2): 167-185.
Gibson, R. & Ward, S. (2009), “Parties in the digital age, a review article”. Representation, 45 (1): 87-100.
Hague, B. & Loader, B. D. (1999), Digital democracy: discource and decision-making in the information age. Londres, Routledge.
Haidt, J. & Hetherington, M. J. (2012). “Look how far we’ve come apart”. The New York Times.
Herbst, S. (2010). Rude democracy: civility and incivility in American politics. Philadelphia, Temple University Press.
Jane, E. (2012). “‘Your a ugly, whorish, slut’: understanding e-bile”. Feminist Media Studies, 23: 115-128.
Lazarsfeld, P. F. & Merton R. K. (1954), “Friendship as a social process: a substantive and methodological analysis”. In: Berger, M.; Abel, T. & Page, C. H. (eds.). Freedom and control in modern society. Nova York, Octagon Books, pp. 18-66.
Lelkes, Y. (2016), “Mass polarization: manifestations and measurements”. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80 (S1): 392-410.
Lutz, C.; Hoffmann, C. P. & Meckel, M. (2014). “Beyond just politics: asystematic literature review of online participation”. First Monday, 19 (7): 1-36.
Martin-Gutierrez, S.; Losada, J. C. & Benito, R. M. (2018). “Recurrent patterns of user behavior in different electoral campaigns: a twitter analysis of the Spanish general elections of 2015 and 2016”. Complexity, 1: 35-48.
Megarry, J. (2014). “Online incivility or sexual harassment? Conceptualising women’s experiences in the digital age”. Women’s Studies International Forum, 47: 46-55.
Papacharissi, Z. (2004), “Democracy online: civility, politeness, and the democratic potential of online political discussion groups”. New Media and Society, 6 (2): 259-283.
Park R. E. & Burgess E. W. (1921), Introduction to the Science of Sociology. Chicago, University Chicago Press.
Rains, S. A.; Kenski, K.; Coe, K. & Harwood, J. (2017), “Incivility and political identity on the internet: intergroup factors as predictors of incivility in discussions of news online”. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 22 (4): 163- 178.
Reingold, B. (2003), Representing women: sex, gender, and legislative behavior in Arizona and California. Los Angeles, University of North Carolina Press.
Robles, José Manuel; Velez, Daniel; De Marco, Stefano; Rodríguez, J. Tinguaro & Gomez, Daniel. (2018), “Affective homogeneity in the Spanish general election debate: a comparative analysis of social networks political agents”. Information, Communication & Society.
Rowe, I. (2015), “Civility 2.0: a comparative analysis of incivility in online political discussion”. Information, Communication & Society, 18 (2): 121-138.
Schradie, J. (2011), “The digital production gap: the digital divide and Web 2.0 Collide”. Poetics, 39 (2): 145-168.
Sobieraj, S. & Berry, J. M. (2011), “From incivility to outrage: political discourse in blogs, talk radio, and cable news”. Political Communication, 28 (1): 19-41.
Spender, D. (1995), Nattering on the net: women, power and cyberspace. North Melbourne, Spinifex Press.
Sunstein, C. (2017), #RepublicDivided Democracy in the Age of Social Media. Princeton, Princeton University Press.
Surowiecki, J. (2004), The wisdom of crowds. Nova York, Anchor.
Vaccari, C., Valeriani, A., Barberá, P., Jost, J. T., Nagler, J., & Tucker, J. A. (2016). “Of echo chambers and contrarian clubs: exposure to political disagreement among German and Italian users of Twitter”. Social Media + Society, 2 (3): 35-48.
Van Haperen, S.; Nicholls, W. & Uitermark, J. (2018). “Building protest online: engagement with the digitally networked# not1more protest campaign on Twitter”. Social Movement Studies, 17 (4): 408-423.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2019 Tempo Social
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
