“The Incest Plot” in John Banville’s Ancient Light
Keywords:John Banville, Ancient Light, Incest Plot, Women
Ancient Light (2012), the third and (to date) final book in the Alexander and Cass Cleave series by John Banville, is a text in which characters who died in the previous books are recycled and brought back as roles in a film, played by characters whose characterisation itself blurs with the roles they are playing. Banville’s established preoccupation with returning to the past and retracing old ground takes on an intriguingly excessive dimension in this novel. Ancient Light presents a heightened version of what Neil Murphy has referred to as an “interlocked intertextual Banvillean world” (86). This article will examine the book using Stephanie Insley Hershinow’s ideas around “the incest plot.” She calls this structure a “model of tautological self-enclosure – the embrace of self-sameness, repetition, even redundancy, over change” (150). My claim is that the novel’s very infrastructure is one of “tautological self-enclosure.” The features of “self-sameness, repetition [and] redundancy” are inescapable in this novel, and the “change” conventionally offered by third books in trilogies is simply not to be encountered in Banville’s relentlessly self-referential third instalment. In her discussion of incest as form, Hershinow contends that “highlighting form is the only way to see the ways that incest exceeds its literal manifestations” (156). She further suggests that incest “is a way for the novel to explore the minimal amount of difference required for narrative to continue to function as such, to experiment with narrative minimalism” (ibid.). The plot structure, as well as a more literal interpretation of ‘incest’ will be mined, given that the narrator’s desire for his dead daughter Cass is the primary animating force behind the narrative.
Allen, R. Perpetually Beginning Until the End of the Fair: The Paratextual Poetics of Serialised Novels. Neohelicon, 2010, 37(1): 181–189.
Banville, John. Mefisto. London: Secker and Warburg, 1986.
---. The Book of Evidence. London: Secker and Warburg, 1989.
---. Eclipse. London: Picador, 2000a.
---. Interview by Joe Jackson. Hot Press 26 October 2000b. Available from: http://www.hotpress.com/features/interviews/John-Banville/416645.html. [16 April 2017].
---. Shroud. New York: Knopf, 2002.
---. Ancient Light. London: Penguin, 2012.
---. Snow. New York: Hanover Square Press, 2020.
---. April in Spain. New York: Hanover Square Press, 2021.
Beston, Rose Marie. CS Lewis’s Theory of Romance. ARIEL: A Review of International English Literature, 1984, 15(1): 3–16.
Brooks, Peter. Body Work: Objects of Desire in Modern Narrative. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1993.
Chattopadhyay, Arka. How to Mourn the Present: Fiction, Memory, and Mourning in Paul Auster’s Man in the Dark and John Banville’s Ancient Light. In Jean-Michel Rabaté (ed.). Knots. London: Routledge, 2019, 227–242.
Coughlan, Patricia. Banville, the Feminine, and the Scenes of Eros. Irish University Review, 2006, 36(1): 81–101.
D’hoker, Elke. “Everything Has to be Qualified”: Reading as Misreading in John Banville and Paul de Man. Studies in Contemporary Fiction, 2018, 59(5): 536–46.
Du Plessis, Rachel Blau. Endings and Contradictions. In Brian Richardson (ed.). Narrative Dynamics: Essays on Time, Plot, Closure, and Frames. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 2002, 282–99.
Hershinow, Stephanie Insley. The Incest Plot: Marriage, Closure, and the Novel’s Endogamy. The Eighteenth Century, 2020, 61(2): 149–164.
Murphy, Neil. John Banville. Maryland: Bucknell University Press, 2018.
Reed, Jacob. Campbell’s Monomyth, Joyce’s Aesthetics and a Romantic Reading of the Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man and Ulysses. MA thesis, California State University, Dominguez Hills, 2020.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2022 Karen Anne McCarthy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.