The defenses employed by women with Turner syndrome: dealing with the disease

Authors

  • Vera Lúcia Soares Chvatal Universidade Estadual de Campinas; Faculdade de Ciências Médicas; Departamento de Psicologia Médica e Psiquiatria; pesquisadora do Laboratório de Pesquisa Clínico-Qualitativa
  • Fátima Böttcher-Luiz Unicamp; FCM; professora do Departamento de Obstetrícia e Ginecologia
  • Egberto Ribeiro Turato Unicamp; FCM; professor do Departamento de Psicologia Médica e Psiquiatria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-60832009000200001

Keywords:

Turner syndrome, defense mechanisms, qualitative research, genetics

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:To understand the defenses employed by women suffering from Turner syndrome (TS) and different ways of dealing with the disease. METHOD: Qualitative research with exploratory design, non-experimental. The instrument consisted of semi-conducted psychological interview, involving 13 women, undergoing semestral medical follow-up at the Women's Health Care Center, and whose sampling was determined by saturation. Data was interpreted using the psychodynamic approach along with an eclectic framework of theoretical references for discussion in the spirit of interdisciplinary approach. RESULTS:These women displayed psychosocial conflicts such as difficulties in interpersonal relationships; feelings of resignation, anger, impotence, devaluation and depression symptoms. Defenses used were: repression, denial, annulment, fantasizing, adaptation and sublimation. DISCUSSION: Women suffering from TS or variant forms must deal with the disease's organic and psychic implications that cause great suffering and often hinder a healthier social insertion. In this case, the study's findings can guide ambulatory psychological support concomitantly to the routine clinical protocol.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2009-01-01

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

The defenses employed by women with Turner syndrome: dealing with the disease . (2009). Archives of Clinical Psychiatry, 36(2), 43-47. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-60832009000200001