Perception comparation of the family and physical therapist using the GMFCS system and the Family Report Questionnaire

Authors

  • Francine Souza da Silva Associação de Assistência à Criança Deficiente
  • Elcinete Wentz de Moura Associação de Assistência à Criança Deficiente
  • Lisa Carla Narumia Associação de Assistência à Criança Deficiente
  • Márcia Harumi Uema Ozu Associação de Assistência à Criança Deficiente

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2317-0190.v30i2a197705

Keywords:

Cerebral Palsy, Family, Physical Therapy Specialty, Data Accuracy, Rehabilitation

Abstract

Cerebral Palsy (CP) is a widely studied and known pathology between the health professionals and carries with it, in the academic environment, some important classifications that help the communication between professionals in a multidisciplinary team. The Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) purpose is to classify the gross motor in the child based on the self-initiated movement ability, being divided in five levels. Just like the multidisciplinary team needs to be aware of this classification and the child level, the parents and/or caregivers also need to know about it and agree on it. This understanding can often be limited, and with that, the relationship between the health professionals and the family can conflict, presenting problems in the future. Objective: This study has the purpose to quantify agreement between the parents and/or caregivers about the classification of the gross motor function when compared with the classification given by the physiotherapy and physiatrist, as well as quantify how much the parents and/or caregivers knew about the previous classification. Method: It is a prospective observational study, done with 96 patients, in which the electronic medical records were analyzed and tabulated. Being then applied the GMFCS Family Repost Questionnaire. Results: All dependent variables who were evaluated demonstrated a concordance above 60%; the Kappa value present was k= >0,7, having, therefore, a moderate to strong reliability between the groups. Conclusion: In general, the health professionals are more susceptible to classify the patients on better functional levels when compared with the family.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Carr LJ, Reddy SK, Stevens S, Blair E, Love S. Definition and classification of cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2005;47(8):508-10. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2005.tb01183.x

Palisano R, Rosenbaum P, Walter S, Russell D, Wood E, Galuppi B. Development and reliability of a system to classify gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1997;39(4):214-23. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.1997.tb07414.x

Palisano RJ, Rosenbaum P, Bartlett D, Livingston MH. Content validity of the expanded and revised Gross Motor Function Classification System. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2008;50(10):744-50. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2008.03089.x

Morris C, Galuppi BE, Rosenbaum PL. Reliability of family report for the Gross Motor Function Classification System. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2004;46(7):455-60. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0012162204000751

Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159-74.

Kottner J, Audige L, Brorson S, Donner A, Gajewski BJ, Hrób-jartsson A, et al. Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed. Int J Nurs Stud. 2011;48(6):661-71. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.01.016

McHugh ML. Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2012;22(3):276-82. Doi: https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2012.031

Rackauskaite G, Thorsen P, Uldall PV, Ostergaard JR. Reliability of GMFCS family report questionnaire. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(9):721-4. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2011.615881

Jackman M, Sakzewski L, Morgan C, Boyd RN, Brennan SE, et al. Interventions to improve physical function for children and young people with cerebral palsy: international clinical practice guideline. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2022;64(5):536-49. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.15055

Shields L. What is “family-centered care”? Eur J Pers Cent Healthc.2015;3(2):139–44. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5750/ejpch.v3i2.993

Silva DB, Pfeifer LI, Funayama CA. Gross Motor Function Classification System Expanded & Revised (GMFCS E & R): reliability between therapists and parents in Brazil. Braz J Phys Ther. 2013;17(5):458-63. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-35552012005000113

Morris C, Kurinczuk JJ, Fitzpatrick R, Rosenbaum PL. Who best to make the assessment? Professionals' and families' classifications of gross motor function in cerebral palsy are highly consistent. Arch Dis Child. 2006;91(8):675-9. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2005.090597

McDowell BC, Kerr C, Parkes J. Interobserver agreement of the Gross Motor Function Classification System in an ambulant population of children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2007;49(7):528-33. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2007.00528.x

Jewell AT, Stokes AI, Bartlett DJ. Correspondence of classifications between parents of children with cerebral palsy aged 2 to 6 years and therapists using the Gross Motor Function Classification System. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011;53(4):334-7. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2010.03853.x

Published

2023-06-30

Issue

Section

Original Article

How to Cite

1.
Silva FS da, Moura EW de, Narumia LC, Ozu MHU. Perception comparation of the family and physical therapist using the GMFCS system and the Family Report Questionnaire. Acta Fisiátr. [Internet]. 2023 Jun. 30 [cited 2024 May 19];30(2):81-6. Available from: https://www.revistas.usp.br/actafisiatrica/article/view/197705