Perception comparation of the family and physical therapist using the GMFCS system and the Family Report Questionnaire
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2317-0190.v30i2a197705Keywords:
Cerebral Palsy, Family, Physical Therapy Specialty, Data Accuracy, RehabilitationAbstract
Cerebral Palsy (CP) is a widely studied and known pathology between the health professionals and carries with it, in the academic environment, some important classifications that help the communication between professionals in a multidisciplinary team. The Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) purpose is to classify the gross motor in the child based on the self-initiated movement ability, being divided in five levels. Just like the multidisciplinary team needs to be aware of this classification and the child level, the parents and/or caregivers also need to know about it and agree on it. This understanding can often be limited, and with that, the relationship between the health professionals and the family can conflict, presenting problems in the future. Objective: This study has the purpose to quantify agreement between the parents and/or caregivers about the classification of the gross motor function when compared with the classification given by the physiotherapy and physiatrist, as well as quantify how much the parents and/or caregivers knew about the previous classification. Method: It is a prospective observational study, done with 96 patients, in which the electronic medical records were analyzed and tabulated. Being then applied the GMFCS Family Repost Questionnaire. Results: All dependent variables who were evaluated demonstrated a concordance above 60%; the Kappa value present was k= >0,7, having, therefore, a moderate to strong reliability between the groups. Conclusion: In general, the health professionals are more susceptible to classify the patients on better functional levels when compared with the family.
Downloads
References
Carr LJ, Reddy SK, Stevens S, Blair E, Love S. Definition and classification of cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2005;47(8):508-10. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2005.tb01183.x
Palisano R, Rosenbaum P, Walter S, Russell D, Wood E, Galuppi B. Development and reliability of a system to classify gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1997;39(4):214-23. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.1997.tb07414.x
Palisano RJ, Rosenbaum P, Bartlett D, Livingston MH. Content validity of the expanded and revised Gross Motor Function Classification System. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2008;50(10):744-50. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2008.03089.x
Morris C, Galuppi BE, Rosenbaum PL. Reliability of family report for the Gross Motor Function Classification System. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2004;46(7):455-60. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0012162204000751
Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159-74.
Kottner J, Audige L, Brorson S, Donner A, Gajewski BJ, Hrób-jartsson A, et al. Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed. Int J Nurs Stud. 2011;48(6):661-71. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.01.016
McHugh ML. Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2012;22(3):276-82. Doi: https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2012.031
Rackauskaite G, Thorsen P, Uldall PV, Ostergaard JR. Reliability of GMFCS family report questionnaire. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(9):721-4. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2011.615881
Jackman M, Sakzewski L, Morgan C, Boyd RN, Brennan SE, et al. Interventions to improve physical function for children and young people with cerebral palsy: international clinical practice guideline. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2022;64(5):536-49. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.15055
Shields L. What is “family-centered care”? Eur J Pers Cent Healthc.2015;3(2):139–44. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5750/ejpch.v3i2.993
Silva DB, Pfeifer LI, Funayama CA. Gross Motor Function Classification System Expanded & Revised (GMFCS E & R): reliability between therapists and parents in Brazil. Braz J Phys Ther. 2013;17(5):458-63. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-35552012005000113
Morris C, Kurinczuk JJ, Fitzpatrick R, Rosenbaum PL. Who best to make the assessment? Professionals' and families' classifications of gross motor function in cerebral palsy are highly consistent. Arch Dis Child. 2006;91(8):675-9. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2005.090597
McDowell BC, Kerr C, Parkes J. Interobserver agreement of the Gross Motor Function Classification System in an ambulant population of children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2007;49(7):528-33. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2007.00528.x
Jewell AT, Stokes AI, Bartlett DJ. Correspondence of classifications between parents of children with cerebral palsy aged 2 to 6 years and therapists using the Gross Motor Function Classification System. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011;53(4):334-7. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2010.03853.x
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Acta Fisiátrica
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.