Influence of the shoot density of Halodule wrightii Ascherson from rocky and sandy habitats on associated macroalgal communities

Authors

  • Kcrishna Vilanova de Souza Barros Universidade Federal do Ceará; Instituto de Ciências do Mar
  • Caroline Feijão Ximenes Universidade Federal do Ceará; Instituto de Ciências do Mar
  • Pedro Bastos Macedo Carneiro Universidade Federal do Ceará; Instituto de Ciências do Mar
  • Cristina de Almeida Rocha-Barreira Universidade Federal do Ceará; Instituto de Ciências do Mar
  • Karine Matos Magalhães Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco; Laboratório de Ecossistemas Aquáticos

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/bjo.v61i4.76531

Abstract

This study evaluated the influence of the shoot density of the shoal grass Halodule wrightii on the composition of the associated algal community, in rocky and sandy habitats on the coast of Ceará in northeastern Brazil. The phycological community included 18 species in 10 families, members of Rodophyta (72.2%), Chlorophyta (22.2%) and Phaeophyceae (5.5%). The largest proportion were epilithic (50%), followed by epiphytes on H. wrightii (38.4%), epipsammics (8%), and epiphytes on other algae (4%). Epiphytes on H. wrightii occurred mainly associated with rhizomes, but also tendrils of H. musciformis occurred attached to the leaves. The phycological community varied according to the density of H. wrightii, independently of particular characters of the meadows, although both habitat and other environmental variables seemed to influence the macroalgae composition and diversity. The rocky habitat was more diverse than the sandy habitat, but in the sandy habitat the shoal grass was important for algal settlement in areas where hard substrates were scarce or absent.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2013-01-01

Issue

Section

naodefinida

How to Cite

Influence of the shoot density of Halodule wrightii Ascherson from rocky and sandy habitats on associated macroalgal communities. (2013). Brazilian Journal of Oceanography, 61(4), 205-214. https://doi.org/10.1590/bjo.v61i4.76531