Dogs and cats run over in an urban area: analysis of the costs generated, risk areas, and other aspects

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1678-4456.bjvras.2024.218076

Keywords:

Run-overs, Carcass, Mapping, Stray dogs

Abstract

Dogs and cats released on public roads can be owned, community-owned, or abandoned. The lack of efficient public policies for canine and feline population management (CFPM) facilitates the presence of animals on the streets, which can cause accidents and be run over. No studies identify the areas most at risk of being run over, nor are the costs involved in removing and properly disposing of carcasses known. The rate of animal running over in the municipalities can serve as an indicator for monitoring responsible animal guardianship actions and the CFPM program strategies. The objective of this study was to analyze the running over of dogs and cats and the costs involved in the Municipality of Pinhais, Paraná, Brazil, compared to other dog and cat population management costs. The City Hall provided data from January 2016 to December 2017 on collecting animal carcasses from public roads, including costs, the number of animals run over by species, and addresses from the running over to map occurrences. During this period, 199 dogs and 32 cats killed by being run over were collected. The service of collecting, transporting, and disposing of animal carcasses had an average monthly cost of R$ 20,325.19 (US$ 3,792), and the amount spent per kilogram of the animal’s weight was R$ 14.83/kg (US$ 2.76). Runovers occurred more frequently in regions with lower socioeconomic status (>90%) and non-fast roads (62.3%), considered, therefore, regions with a greater propensity to aggravations. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abra FD, Granziera BM, Huijser MP, Ferraz KMPMB, Haddad CM, Paolino RM. Pay or prevent? Human safety, costs to society and legal perspectives on animal-vehicle collisions in São Paulo state, Brazil. PLoS One. 2019;14(4):e0215152. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215152. PMid:30973920.

Baquero OS, Marconcin S, Rocha A, Garcia RCM. Companion animal demography and population management in Pinhais, Brazil. Prev Vet Med. 2018;158:169-77. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2018.07.006. PMid:30220391.

Brasil. Ministério da Justiça. Portaria nº 1070, de 30 de julho de 2015. Tabela de Preços Públicos. Diário Oficial da União; Brasília; 2015 Aug 3.

Cardoso CVP. Descarte de carcaças. In: Andrade A, Pinto SC, Oliveira RS, editors. Animais de laboratório: criação e experimentação. Rio de Janeiro: Fiocruz; 2002. p. 281-8.

Cherry CC, Dietz S, Sauber-Schatz E, Russell S, Proctor J, Buttke D. Characteristics of animal-related motor vehicle crashes in select National Park Service units-United States, 1990-2013. Traffic Inj Prev. 2019;20(1):58-63. http://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2018.1508835. PMid:30644778.

Daros EJ. Acidentes de trânsito e comportamento humano. In: Anais do I Encontro Nacional para Prevenção de Acidentes de Trânsito e Primeiros Socorros ao Acidentado; 1998. Sociedade Nordestina de Neurocirurgia; 1998. Esri. ArcGIS [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2023 Oct 31]. Available from: https://arcg.is/4eDvf

Figueiredo Filho YA, Manfredini S. Contaminação do solo e das águas subterrâneas por sepultamento de carcaças de animais no solo [tese]. São Paulo: Universidade de São Paulo; 2011. http://doi.org/10.11606/D.8.2011.tde29082012-115144.

Forman R, Sperling D, Bissonette J, Clevenger A. Road ecology: science and solutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2003. Forman RTT, Alexander LE. Roads and their major ecological effects. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 1998;29(1):207-31. http://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.29.1.207.

Garcia RCM, Calderón N, Ferreira F. Consolidação de diretrizes internacionais de manejo de populações caninas em áreas urbanas e proposta de indicadores para seu gerenciamento. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2012;32(2):140-4. http://doi.org/10.1590/S1020-49892012000800008. PMid:23099875.

Groot GWTA, Hazebroek E. Ungulate traffic collisions in Europe. Biology. 1996;10(4):1059-67. Huijser MP, Duffield JW, Clevenger AP, Ament RJ, McGowen PT. Cost-benefit analyses of mitigation measures aimed at reducing collisions with large ungulates in the United States and canada: a decision support tool. Ecol Soc. 2009;14(2): art15. http://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03000-140215.

International Companion Animal Management Coalition – ICAM. Guia de controle humanitário da população canina. ICAM; 2007.

Jardim JMM, Silva Júnior RA, Pascoal IC, Oliveira AADF, Pinheiro Júnior JW. Análise dos acidentes de trânsito ocasionados por animais nas rodovias federais do estado de Pernambuco, Brasil. Med Vet. 2017;11(1):76. http://doi.org/10.26605/medvet-n1-1628.

Lima AFM, Luna SPL. Algumas causas e consequências da superpopulação canina e felina: acaso ou descaso? Rev Educ Contin Med Vet Zootec CRMV-SP. 2012;10(1):32-8. http://doi.org/10.36440/recmvz.v10i1.258.

López M. “Animaladas” en el asfalto. Tráfico Segur Vial. 2012;35-7. Oliveira HV, Morikawa VM, Biondo AW, Garcia RCM. A remoção de animais mortos nas ruas indica guarda irresponsável e sai mais caro que educação e castração gratuitas. Rev Clin Vet. 2015;116:32-6.

Pinhais. Prefeitura Municipal. Plano de habitação e regularização fundiária. Ecotécnica; 2010. Sáenz-de-Santa-María A, Tellería JL. Wildlife-vehicle collisions in Spain. Eur J Wildl Res. 2015;61(3):399-406. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-015-0907-7.

Salvato MA, Ferreira PCG, Duarte AJM. O impacto da escolaridade sobre a distribuição de renda. Estud Econ. 2010;40(4):753-91. http://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-41612010000400001.

Santo Ângelo. Prefeitura Municipal. Edital nº 109/2013. Coleta, transporte, tratamento e destino final de resíduos sólidos urbanos: planilha de custos (animais mortos). Santo Ângelo: Departamento de Compras e Patrimônio; 2014.

Vieira EM. Highway mortality of mammals in central Brazil. Cienc Cult. 1996;48(4):270-2.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-06

How to Cite

1.
Rocha Y da SG da, Gomes LR, Brugnerotto M, Garcia R de CM. Dogs and cats run over in an urban area: analysis of the costs generated, risk areas, and other aspects. Braz. J. Vet. Res. Anim. Sci. [Internet]. 2024 Dec. 6 [cited 2025 Jan. 24];61:e218076. Available from: https://www.revistas.usp.br/bjvras/article/view/218076