Seroprevalence of anti-Ehrlichia sp. and Anaplasma sp. antibodies in dogs sheltered in 2022 in Maceió, Alagoas

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1678-4456.bjvras.2024.218095

Keywords:

Hemoparasitosis, Ehrlichia canis, Anaplasma platys

Abstract

Hemoparasitoses are diseases that have many cases in the medical-veterinary routine, mainly affecting dogs. Main hemoparasitoses include canine monocytic ehrlichiosis (CME) and canine thrombocytic anaplasmosis (CTA). The present study aimed to carry out an analysis regarding cases of ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis and the presence of antibodies against Ehrlichia sp. and Anaplasma sp. in dogs treated by the Integra Animal Project, observing epidemiological data, such as age group, sex, and presence of ticks. Blood count, epidemiological profile, and 4DXs plus test were analyzed from 102 dogs taken in by the project. A descriptive analysis was carried out regarding the collected data, focusing on data such as age group (in months), presence of Rhipicephalus sanguineus ticks, erythrogram, leukogram, and animals positive and negative for ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis. Out of the 102 dogs, 48 (47%) of the animals had antibodies to Ehrlichia canis., and 23 (22.5%) had antibodies to Anaplasma platys. With these results, it was possible to analyze the hematological evidence in positive and negative dogs and draw conclusions from the study’s findings. Notably, among the positive animals, only 4 (4%) had the presence of ticks and no clinical manifestations, while 32 (31.7%) showed normocytic normochromic anemia and no significant changes in leukogram variables. There was no statistical difference between genders and the presence of ticks, with substantial change only being noticeable in elderly dogs due to the prevalence of antibodies in the animal’s body. It is concluded that the 4DX plus test effectively detects antibodies for these infections. However, it requires direct correlation with laboratory tests, contributing significantly to the diagnosis and treatment of canine ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aguiar DM, Saito TB, Hagiwara MK, Machado RZ, Labruna MB. Diagnóstico sorológico de erliquiose canina com antígeno brasileiro de Ehrlichia canis. Cienc Rural. 2007;37(3):796-802. http://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-84782007000300030.

Almosny NR, Massard CL, Labarthe NV, O’Dwyer NV, Souza LH, Alves LC, Serrão ML. Hemoparasitoses em pequenos animais domesticos e como zoonoses. 1ª ed. Rio de Janeiro: L. F. Livros de Veterinária; 2002. (vol. 1).

Amaro FPA, Maczuga JM, Caron LF. A vacinologia em cães e gatos. Arch Vet Sci. 2016;21(1):1-10. http://doi.org/10.5380/avs.v21i1.39570.

Bouzouraa T, René-Martellet M, Chêne J, Attipa C, Lebert I, Chalvet-Monfray K, Cadoré J-L, Halos L, Chabanne L. Clinical and laboratory features of canine Anaplasma platys infection in 32 naturally infected dogs in the Mediterranean basin. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2016;7(6):1256-64. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ttbdis.2016.07.004. PMid:27426437.

Brooks MB, Harr KE, Seelig DM, Wardrop KJ, Weiss DJ. Schalm’s veterinary hematology. 7th ed. Ames: Wiley Blackwell; 2022. (vol. 1). http://doi.org/10.1002/9781119500537.

Harrus S, Waner T. Diagnosis of canine monocytotropic ehrlichiosis (Ehrlichia canis): an overview. Vet J. 2011;187(3):292-6. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2010.02.001. PMid:20226700.

Instituto Pet Brasil. Projeção do Instituto Pet Brasil aponta que setor pet deve crescer 22,1% em 2021. São Paulo; 2021.

Leal PDS, Moraes MIMR, Barbosa LL O, Lopes CWG. Blood parasites infections in domiciled dogs in an animal health service in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Braz J Vet Med. 2015;31(1):55-62.

Moreira L, Kinappe L, Duhart D, Motta A S. A geriatria canina e o manejo das doenças neoplásicas: revisão. Pubvet. 2018;12(4):1-7.

Narayana Rao L, Shobhamani B, Vaikunta Rao V, Subramanyam K. Comparative efficacy of doxycycline and imidocarb diprionate in treatment of ehrlichiosis in dogs. Pharma Innov. 2022;11(4):1304-9.

Ribeiro CM, Matos AC, Azzolini T, Bones ER, Wasnieski EA, Richini-Pereira VB, Lucheis SB, Vidotto O. Molecular epidemiology of Anaplasma platys, Ehrlichia canis and Babesia vogeli in stray dogs in Paraná, Brazil. Pesq Vet Bras. 2017;37(2):129-36. http://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-736x2017000200006.

Sainz Á, Roura X, Miró G, Estrada-Peña A, Kohn B, Harrus S, Solano-Gallego L. Guideline for veterinary practitioners on canine ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis in Europe. Parasit Vectors. 2015;8(1):75. http://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-015-0649-0. PMid:25649069.

Silva JN, Almeida ABPF, Boa Sorte EC, Freitas AG, Santos LGF, Aguiar DM, Sousa VRF. Soroprevalência de anticorpos anti-Ehrlichia canis em cães de Cuiabá, Mato Grosso. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet. 2010;19(2):108-11. PMid:20624348.

Uslu M, Canbar R. Imidocarb use in animals. Vet Farm Toks Dern Bult. 2022;13(2):120-31. http://doi.org/10.38137/vftd.1141522.

Witter R, Vecchi SN, Pacheco TDA, Melo ALT, Borsa A, Sinkoc AL, Mendonça AJ, Aguiar DM. Prevalência da erliquiose monocítica canina e anaplasmose trombocítica em cães suspeitos de hemoparasitose em Cuiabá, Mato Grosso. Semina: Ciênc Agrár. 2013;34(6, Suppl 2):3811. http://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2013v34n6Supl2p3811.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-09

How to Cite

1.
Oliveira A dos S, Graboschii ACG, Silva K de O e, Melo M, Bittencourt TCB dos SC de, Escodro PB. Seroprevalence of anti-Ehrlichia sp. and Anaplasma sp. antibodies in dogs sheltered in 2022 in Maceió, Alagoas. Braz. J. Vet. Res. Anim. Sci. [Internet]. 2024 Dec. 9 [cited 2025 Jan. 24];61:e218095. Available from: https://www.revistas.usp.br/bjvras/article/view/218095