Donkey skin trade: is it sustainable to slaughter donkeys for their skin?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1678-4456.bjvras.2021.174252Keywords:
Animal Welfare, Sustainability, Biosecurity, Animal health, DonkeyAbstract
Donkeys (Equus asinus) face a global crisis. The health, welfare, and even survival of donkeys are being compromised as the demand for their skins increases. It is driven by the production of ejiao, a traditional Chinese remedy believed by some to have medicinal properties. It is estimated that the ejiao industry currently requires approximately 4.8 million donkey skins per year. Since there is no productive chain for donkey skin production outside of China, the activity is extractive and has resulted in the decimation of donkeys. Gestation is 12 months in donkeys, increasing the risk of extinction if such practices are not controlled. In this scenario, the donkeys are collected (purchased for low prices, stolen, and collected from the side of the roads) and are then often transported for long distances, usually without water, food, or rest. The trade, in Brazil, poses significant biosecurity risks, particularly because examinations are rarely conducted and therefore infectious diseases, such as glanders and infectious anemia, remain undetected. Furthermore, in chronic stress situations, the immune system is suppressed, increasing the biosecurity risk, especially because donkeys are a silent carrier of diseases. Rarely there is traceability with animals from different origins being put together in “fake farms”, before being delivered to slaughterhouses. The opportunistic strategy of collecting animals, or buying for low prices, keeping them without access to food and veterinary assistance, is what makes this trade profitable. Our experience in donkey welfare and the global skin trade suggest that it will be enormously challenging and cost-prohibitive to run a trade at the standards required to be considered humane, sustainable, and safe. Although donkeys are being blamed for the involvement in road accidents, it is not an ethical solution to maintain this trade as an alternative. Moreover, the ecological role of donkeys in native ecosystems has not been elucidated, and some studies indicate they could even have a positive effect. Regardless of the future the donkeys will have; we must guarantee a life with the least dignity to the animals under our responsibility.
Downloads
References
Agência Estadual de Defesa Agropecuária da Bahia - ADAB. Nota técnica – ADAB mantém medidas preventivas em relação aos asininos [Internet]. Salvador: ADAB; 2019. Available from: http://www.adab.ba.gov.br/2019/05/1911/-Nota-tecnica-ADAB-mantem-medidas-preventivas-em-relacao-aos-asininos.html
Adams DB. Transportation of animals and welfare. Rev Sci Tech. 1994;13(1):153-69. PMid:8173094.
Arora RS, Brent DA, Jaenicke EC. Is India ready for alt-meat? Preferences and willingness to pay for meat alternatives. Sustain. 2020;12(11):4377. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114377.
Bennett R, Pfuderer S. The potential for new donkey farming systems to supply the growing demand for hides. Animals. 2020;10(4):718. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10040718. PMid:32326062.
Berg C, Raj M. A review of different stunning methods for Poultry: animal welfare aspects (stunning methods for poultry). Anim. 2015;5(4):1207-19. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani5040407. PMid:26633521.
Bergero D, Nery J. Hepatic diseases in horses. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr. 2008;92(3):345-55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0396.2007.00798.x. PMid:18477316.
Brasil. Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil. Diário Oficial da União [Internet]. Brasília; 1988 Oct 5. Available from: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/constituicao/constituicao.htm
Brasil. Lei nº 9.605, de 12 de fevereiro de 1998. Dispõe sobre as sanções penais e administrativas derivadas de condutas e atividades lesivas ao meio ambiente, e dá outras providências. Diário Oficial da União [Internet]. Brasília; 1998 Feb. 12. Available from: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l9605.htm
Brasil. Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento. Indicadores gerais Agrostat [Internet]. Brasília; 2018. Available from: http://indicadores.agricultura.gov.br/agrostat/index.htm
Brasil. Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento. Secretaria de Mobilidade Social, do Produtor Rural e Cooperativismo. Manual de boas práticas de manejo em equideocultura. Brasília: MAPA/ACE/CGCS; 2017.
Broom DM, Johnson KG. Approaching questions of stress and welfare. In: Broom DM, Johnson KG, editors. Stress and animal welfare. Dordrecht: Springer; 1993. p. 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-0980-2_1.
Burden FA, Du Toit N, Hazell-Smith E, Trawford AF. Hyperlipemia in a population of aged donkeys: description, prevalence, and potential risk factors. J Vet Intern Med. 2011;25(6):1420-5.. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-1676.2011.00798.x. PMid:22092637.
Carneiro GF, Lucena JEC, Barros LO. The current situation and trend of the donkey industry in South America. J Equine Vet Sci. 2018;65:106-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2018.03.007.
Conselho Regional de Medicina Veterinária do Estado da Bahia. Solicitação de suspensão das atividades de abate de asininos no Brasil, dirigida à Comissão Nacional de Bem- Estar Animal do Conselho Federal de Medicina Veterinária – COBEA/CFMV. Salvador; 2018.
Dias DM, Massara RL, Bocchiglieri A. Use of habitats by donkeys and cattle within a protected area of the Caatinga dry forest biome in northeastern Brazil. Perspect Ecol Conserv. 2019;17(2):64-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecon.2019.04.005.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nation. FAOSTAT [Internet]. Rome: FAO; 2017 [cited 2007 Aug 28]. Available from: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/EMN
Hamrick RG, Pirgalioglu T, Gunduz S, Carroll JP. Feral donkey Equus asinus populations on the Karpaz peninsula, Cyprus. Eur J Wildl Res. 2005;51(2):108-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-005-0085-0.
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística - IBGE. Censo agropecuário [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2007 Aug 28]. Available from: ftp://ftp.ibge.gov.br/Producao_Pecuaria/Producao_da_Pecuaria_Municipal/2012/tabelas_pdf/tab13.pdf
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística - IBGE. Censo agropecuário [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2007 Aug 28]. Available from: https://censos.ibge.gov.br/agro/2017/templates/censo_agro/resultadosagro/pecuaria.html? localidade=0&tema=75642
Kafruni S, Souza R. Travessia dos inocentes [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 Aug 17]. Available from: https://www.correiobraziliense.com.br/brasil/2020/08/4867269-travessia-dos-inocentes.html
Karaźniewicz J, Sołtyszewski I, Malewski T, Szarek J, Felsmann M, Grudzień W, Dzikowski A. Review of procedures concerning animals involved in traffic accidents - Including own investigations. Pol J Nat Sci. 2018;33(3):503-16.
Kufner MB, Sepúlveda L, Gavier G, Madoery L, Giraudo L. Is the native deer Mazama gouazoubira threatened by competition for food with the exotic hare Lepus europaeus in the degraded Chaco in Córdoba, Argentina? J Arid Environ. 2008;72(12):2159-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2008.07.005.
Lamoot I, Callebaut J, Demeulenaere E, Vandenberghe C, Hoffmann M. Foraging behaviour of donkeys grazing in a coastal dune area in temperate climate conditions. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2005;92(1-2):93-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2004.10.017.
Malo JE, González BA, Mata C, Vielma A, Donoso DS, Fuentes N, Estades CF. Low habitat overlap at landscape scale between wild camelids and feral donkeys in the Chilean desert. Acta Oecol. 2016;70:1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actao.2015.11.002.
Malo JE, Suárez F, Díez A. Can we mitigate animal-vehicle accidents using predictive models? J Appl Ecol. 2004;41(4):701-10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-8901.2004.00929.x.
McLean AK, Navas Gonzalez FJ. Can scientists influence donkey welfare? Historical perspective and a contemporary view. J Equine Vet Sci. 2018;65:25-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2018.03.008.
Mendoza FJ, Toribio RE, Perez-Ecija A. Metabolic and endocrine disorders in donkeys. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract. 2019;35(3):399-417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cveq.2019.07.001. PMid:31587976.
Prado HM. Feeding ecology of five Neotropical ungulates: a critical review. Oecol Aust. 2013;17(4):459-73. https://doi.org/10.4257/oeco.2013.1704.02.
Regan FH, Hockenhull J, Pritchard JC, Waterman-Pearson AE, Whay HR. Identifying behavioral differences in working donkeys in response to analgesic administration. Equine Vet J. 2016;48(1):33-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.12356. PMid:25256702.
Reis GG, Heidemann MS, Borini FM, Molento CFM. Livestock value chain in transition: cultivated (cell-based) meat and the need for breakthrough capabilities. Technol Soc. 2020;62:101286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101286.
Shen L, Chen H, Zhu Q, Wang Y, Wang S, Qian J, Wang Y, Qu H. Identification of bioactive ingredients with immuno-enhancement and anti-oxidative effects from Fufang-Ejiao-Syrup by LC-MSn combined with bioassays. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2016;117:363-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2015.09.024. PMid:26433168.
Suarez J. A demanda chinesa que ameaça o jumento brasileiro: Como um acordo com a China provocou uma corrida ao abate de asininos e agora ameaça a espécie símbolo do Nordeste. El País [Internet]; 2019 Dec 11. Available from: https://brasil.elpais.com/brasil/2019-12-11/sob-a-pele-do-jumento.html
Terlouw C, Bourguet C, Deiss V. Consciousness, unconsciousness and death in the context of slaughter. Part II. evaluation methods. Meat Sci. 2016;118:147-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.03.010. PMid:27086068.
The Donkey Sanctuary. Factsheet: owners [Internet]. United Kingdom; 2013. Available from: https://www.thedonkeysanctuary.org.uk/sites/uk/files/2018-12/condition-scoring-and-weight-estimation-of-the-donkey-20181211.pdf
The Donkey Sanctuary. The clinical companion of the Donkey. 1st ed. United Kingdom: Troubador Publishing; 2018.
The Donkey Sanctuary. Under the skin: update on the global crisis for donkeys and the people who depend on them [Internet]. United Kingdom; 2019 Available from: https://www.thedonkeysanctuary.org.uk/sites/uk/files/2019-12/under-the-skin-report-english-revised-2019.pdf
Thurfjell H, Spong G, Olsson M, Ericsson G. Avoidance of high traffic levels results in lower risk of wild boar-vehicle accidents. Landsc Urban Plan. 2015;133:98-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.09.015.
Universidade Federal de Lavras - UFLA. CBEE: Centro Brasileiro de Estudos em Ecologia de Estradas [Internet]. 2020. Available from: http://cbee.ufla.br/portal/atropelometro/
Uppal PK. Emergence of Nipah virus in Malaysia. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2000;916(1):354-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb05312.x. PMid:11193645.
Van Zandt KE, Greer MT, Gelhaus HC. Glanders: an overview of infection in humans. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2013;8(1):131. https://doi.org/10.1186/1750-1172-8-131. PMid:24004906.
Verhoeven MTW, Gerritzen MA, Hellebrekers LJ, Kemp B. Indicators used in livestock to assess unconsciousness after stunning: a review. Animal. 2015;9(2):320-30. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731114002596. PMid:25354537.
Wallach AD, Lundgren EJ, Ripple WJ, Ramp D. Invisible megafauna. Conserv Biol. 2018;32(4):962-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13116. PMid:29693743.
Warne S. How glanders in Germany has affected global equine transportation. Eurodressage; 2015 Feb 28. Available from: https://eurodressage.com/2015/02/28/how-glanders-germany-has-affected-global-equine-transportation-0
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The journal content is authorized under the Creative Commons BY-NC-SA license (summary of the license: https://
