Long-term efficiency of cataract surgery with hydrophilic acrylic Ioflex intraocular lens

Authors

  • Priscilla A. Jorge Universidade de São Paulo; Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP; Departamento de Oftalmologia
  • Camila Ribeiro Koch Universidade de São Paulo; Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP; Departamento de Oftalmologia
  • Delano Jorge Universidade Federal de São Paulo; Departamento de Oftalmologia
  • Newton Kara-Junior Universidade de São Paulo; Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP; Departamento de Oftalmologia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2017(09)04

Keywords:

Cataract, Lenses, Intraocular, Economics, Postoperative Complications, Cost and Cost Analysis

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficiency of long-term cataract surgery using low-cost intraocular lens implantation in community campaigns. METHODS: Fifty-eight randomly selected patients were evaluated four years after phacoemulsification and Ioflex intraocular lens implantation. Causes of low visual acuity related to the intraocular lens were evaluated, and treatment costs were calculated. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 72±10.2 years. Four years after surgery, 25 eyes (43.0%) had decreased visual acuity related to the intraocular lens: posterior capsule opacification was noted in 24 eyes (41.3%), and intraocular lens opacification was noted in one eye (1.7%). The total cost of the post-surgical complication treatments represented 6.3% of the initial budget of the entire surgical patient group. CONCLUSIONS: The efficiency of cataract surgery with low-cost Ioflex intraocular lens implantation was significantly reduced in a long-term follow-up study because postoperative complications related to intraocular lenses emerged at higher rates than when the gold-standard treatment was used.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2017-10-01

Issue

Section

Clinical Sciences

How to Cite

Long-term efficiency of cataract surgery with hydrophilic acrylic Ioflex intraocular lens. (2017). Clinics, 72(9), 543-546. https://doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2017(09)04