Follow-up of the aneurysmal sac after exclusion and bypass of popliteal artery aneurysms

Authors

  • Tais Bugs Wakassa São Paulo University Medical School; Hospital das Clinicas; Department of Vascular Surgery
  • Patrícia Matsunaga São Paulo University Medical School; Hospital das Clinicas; Department of Vascular Surgery
  • Erasmo Simão da Silva São Paulo University Medical School; Hospital das Clinicas; Department of Vascular Surgery
  • Carlos A. Pinto São Paulo University Medical School; Hospital das Clinicas; Department of Vascular Surgery
  • Paulo Kauffman São Paulo University Medical School; Hospital das Clinicas; Department of Vascular Surgery
  • Ricardo Aun São Paulo University Medical School; Hospital das Clinicas; Department of Vascular Surgery
  • Pedro Puech-Leão São Paulo University Medical School; Hospital das Clinicas; Department of Vascular Surgery

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S1807-59322006000200004

Keywords:

Popliteal artery aneurysm, Arterial aneurysm, Postoperative follow-up

Abstract

Popliteal artery aneurysms are frequent and may lead to thromboembolic events and limb loss. PURPOSE: To evaluate clinical and ultrasonographic follow-up of patients who underwent exclusion of a popliteal artery aneurysm using the technique proposed by Edwards. METHODS: Data of all patients who underwent surgery to repair a popliteal artery aneurysm at Hospital das Clinicas, the São Paulo University Medical School between 1996 and 2004 were reviewed. Inclusion criteria were repair with aneurysm exclusion and bypass using the technique proposed by Edwards, as well as the existence of preoperative and postoperative measurements of the aneurysmal sac. RESULTS: Data of 16 patients who underwent 20 procedures for popliteal artery aneurysm exclusion and bypass were available to analysis. The preoperative diameter of the popliteal artery aneurysms ranged from 1.3 cm to 6.1 cm (mean = 3.1 cm). Patients underwent duplex ultrasound scanning 1 month to 7 years after surgical repair. Follow-up of the 20 cases revealed that 10 aneurysms exhibited decreased mean transverse diameters, ranging from 0.2 to 2.3 cm, while 7 had increased in diameter, ranging 0.3 to 3.3 cm, and 3 remained unchanged. Flow was observed only in 5 outo f the 20 procedures, 3 of which (60%) had increased diameters. CONCLUSION: Although exclusion is a widely accepted procedure for the repair of popliteal artery aneurysms, data in the literature and the results of this study, which did not include cases of rupture or compression, suggest that strict follow-up of patients who undergo aneurysm exclusion is necessary.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2006-04-01

Issue

Section

Original Research

How to Cite

Follow-up of the aneurysmal sac after exclusion and bypass of popliteal artery aneurysms . (2006). Clinics, 61(2), 107-112. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1807-59322006000200004