The impact of clinical and genetic screenings on the management of the multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1

Authors

  • Delmar Muniz Lourenço-Jr Universidade de São Paulo; Faculdade de Medicina; Hospital das Clínicas; Unidade de Endocrinologia Genética
  • Rodrigo Almeida Toledo Universidade de São Paulo; Faculdade de Medicina; Hospital das Clínicas; Unidade de Endocrinologia Genética
  • Flavia Lima Coutinho Universidade de São Paulo; Faculdade de Medicina; Hospital das Clínicas; Unidade de Endocrinologia Genética
  • Leontina Conceição Margarido Universidade de São Paulo; Faculdade de Medicina; Hospital das Clínicas; Departamento de Dermatologia
  • Sheila Aparecida Coelho Siqueira Universidade de São Paulo; Faculdade de Medicina; Hospital das Clínicas; Departamento de Divisão de Anatomia Patológica
  • Marcelo Augusto Cortina Gonçalves dos Santos Universidade de São Paulo; Faculdade de Medicina; Hospital das Clínicas; Unidade de Endocrinologia Genética
  • Fabio Luiz de Menezes Montenegro Universidade de São Paulo; Faculdade de Medicina; Hospital das Clínicas; Departamento de Cirurgia de Cabeça e Pescoço
  • Marcel Cerqueira Cesar Machado Universidade de São Paulo; Faculdade de Medicina; Hospital das Clínicas; Departamento de Gastroenterologia Cirúrgica
  • Sergio Pereira Almeida Toledo Universidade de São Paulo; Faculdade de Medicina; Hospital das Clínicas; Unidade de Endocrinologia Genética

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S1807-59322007000400014

Keywords:

Multiple endocrine neoplasia, MEN1, MEN1 gene, Screening, Genetic diagnosis

Abstract

PURPOSE: To perform clinical and genetic screening for multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) in patients at the Academic Hospital of the University of São Paulo School of Medicine, and to analyze its impact on clinical management of patients with MEN1. METHODS: The clinical diagnosis of MEN1 was made in accordance with the Consensus on multiple endocrine neoplasias. Mutation analysis of the entire MEN1 tumor suppressor gene and genetic screening of at-risk family members were performed by direct sequencing. To analyze the implementation of genetic diagnosis, the studied patients were separated into 3 groups: MEN1 index cases (group I), clinically diagnosed MEN1 cases (group II), and genetically diagnosed MEN1 cases (group III). RESULTS: In total, 154 individuals were clinically and genetically studied. We identified 12 different MEN1 mutations. Fifty-two MEN1 cases were identified: 13 in group I, 28 in group II, and 11 in group III. The mean age in group III (27.0 years) was significantly lower than in groups I (39.5 years) and II (42.4 years; P = 0.03 and P = 0.01, respectively). Patients in groups I and II mostly presented 2 or 3 MEN1-related tumors, while 81.8% of those in group III presented 1 or no MEN1-related tumor. Additionally, in group III, 45.4% of cases were asymptomatic, and no metastasis or death was verified. Surveillance for MEN1 mutations allowed the exclusion of 102 noncarriers, including a case of MEN1 phenocopy. CONCLUSION: Our data supports the benefits of clinical and genetic screening for multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 in the management of this syndrome.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2007-01-01

Issue

Section

Clinical Sciences

How to Cite

The impact of clinical and genetic screenings on the management of the multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 . (2007). Clinics, 62(4), 465-470. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1807-59322007000400014