Comparison of self-report and interview administration methods based on the Brazilian versions of the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire in patients with rotator cuff disorders

Authors

  • Andréa Diniz Lopes Hospital Albert Einstein; Sociedade Beneficente Israelita Brasileira; Centro de Reabilitação
  • Ricardo de Vilar e Furtado Hospital Albert Einstein; Sociedade Beneficente Israelita Brasileira; Centro de Reabilitação
  • César Augusto da Silva Hospital Albert Einstein; Sociedade Beneficente Israelita Brasileira; Centro de Reabilitação
  • Liu Chiao Yi Hospital Albert Einstein; Sociedade Beneficente Israelita Brasileira; Centro de Reabilitação
  • Cristina Assumpção Malfatti Hospital Albert Einstein; Sociedade Beneficente Israelita Brasileira; Centro de Reabilitação
  • Silvana Antunes de Araújo Hospital Albert Einstein; Sociedade Beneficente Israelita Brasileira; Centro de Reabilitação

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S1807-59322009000200009

Keywords:

Shoulder, Rotator cuff, Questionnaires, Quality of life, Validation studies

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study was to compare self-report and interview administration methods using the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC) and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire (DASH) in patients with rotator cuff disorders. METHODS: Thirty male and female patients over 18 years of age with rotator cuff disorders (tendinopathy or rotator cuff tear) and Brazilian Portuguese as their primary language were recruited for assessment via administration of the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index and and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire. A randomization method was used to determine whether the questionnaires would be self-reported (n=15) or administered by an interviewer (n=15). Pearson correlation coefficients were used to evaluate the correlation between the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index and and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire in each group. The t-test was used to determine whether the difference in mean questionnaire scores and administration time was statistically significant. For statistical analysis, the level of significance was set at 5%. RESULTS: The mean subject age was 55.07 years, ranging from 27 to 74 years. Most patients had a diagnosis of tendinopathy (n=21). With regard to level of schooling, the majority (n=26) of subjects had completed a college degree or higher. The mean questionnaire scores and administration times did not significantly differ between the two groups (p>;0.05). There were statistically significant correlations (p<0.05) between Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index and and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire, and strong correlations were found between the questionnaires in both groups. CONCLUSION: There are no differences between the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire administration methods with regard to administration time or correlations between the questionnaires.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2009-02-01

Issue

Section

Clinical Sciences

How to Cite

Comparison of self-report and interview administration methods based on the Brazilian versions of the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire in patients with rotator cuff disorders . (2009). Clinics, 64(2), 121-125. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1807-59322009000200009