Mini-rhexis for white intumescent cataracts

Authors

  • Newton Kara-Junior Universidade de São Paulo; Faculdade de Medicina; Ophthalmology Department
  • Marcony Rodrigues de Santhiago Universidade de São Paulo; Faculdade de Medicina; Ophthalmology Department
  • Andrea Kawakami Universidade de São Paulo; Faculdade de Medicina; Ophthalmology Department
  • Pedro Carricondo Universidade de São Paulo; Faculdade de Medicina; Ophthalmology Department
  • Wilson Takashi Hida Universidade de São Paulo; Faculdade de Medicina; Ophthalmology Department

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S1807-59322009000400007

Keywords:

Cataract, Intumescent, Capsulorhexis, Minirhexis, Capsulotomy

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the intraoperative safety of two techniques of capsulorhexis for intumescent white cataracts: traditional one-stage continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis and two-stage continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis. METHODS: This prospective comparative randomized study included two groups: the 1-CCC group (11 patients) received traditional one-stage continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis with 5-6 mm diameter, and the 2-CCC (13 patients) group received a deliberately small continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis that was secondarily enlarged, or a two-stage continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis. Patients were stratified according to cataract subset, which was characterized echographically. Six patients were considered as type 1, fifteen as type 2 and three as type 3. Type 1 included intumescent white cataracts with cortex liquefaction and extensive internal acoustic reflections, type 2 included white cataracts with voluminous nuclei, a small amount of whitish solid cortex, and minimal internal acoustic reflections, and type 3 included white cataracts with fibrous anterior capsules and few internal echo spikes. RESULTS: With the one-stage technique, 46.15% of patients had leakage of the liquefied cortex; in addition, the surgeon perceived high intracapsular pressure in 61.53% of cases. Anterior capsule tears occurred in 23.07% of cases, discontinuity of capsulorhexis in 30.79% of cases and no posterior capsular rupture occurred. With the two-stage technique, leakage of the liquefied cortex occurred in 45.45% of cases; additionally, the surgeon perceived high intracapsular pressure in 36.36% of cases. No anterior capsule tears, discontinuity of capsulorhexis or posterior capsular rupture occurred. Considering each cataract subset, there was a higher incidence of leakage for type 2 as compared to types 1 and 3. CONCLUSIONS: Two-stage continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis helps prevent unexpected radial tears of the initial capsulotomy from high intracapsular pressure, sudden radialization of the CCC and other intraoperative complications due to high intracapsular pressure, thus providing a safe cataract surgery in cases of white cataracts. These findings were supported by ultrasonography.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2009-04-01

Issue

Section

Clinical Sciences

How to Cite

Mini-rhexis for white intumescent cataracts . (2009). Clinics, 64(4), 309-312. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1807-59322009000400007