Endothelial and non-endothelial coronary blood flow reserve and left ventricular dysfunction in systemic hypertension

Authors

  • Aloísio Marchi Rocha Universidade de São Paulo; da Faculdade de Medicina; Hospital das Clínicas; Heart Institute
  • Vera Maria Cury Salemi Universidade de São Paulo; da Faculdade de Medicina; Hospital das Clínicas; Heart Institute
  • Pedro Alves Lemos Neto Universidade de São Paulo; Faculdade de Medicina; Hospital das Clínicas; Heart Institute
  • Afonso Yoshikiro Matsumoto Universidade de São Paulo; da Faculdade de Medicina; Hospital das Clínicas; Heart Institute
  • Valéria Fontenelle Angelim Pereira Universidade de São Paulo; da Faculdade de Medicina; Hospital das Clínicas; Heart Institute
  • Fábio Fernandes Universidade de São Paulo; da Faculdade de Medicina; Hospital das Clínicas; Heart Institute
  • Luciano Nastari Universidade de São Paulo; da Faculdade de Medicina; Hospital das Clínicas; Heart Institute
  • Charles Mady Universidade de São Paulo; da Faculdade de Medicina; Hospital das Clínicas; Heart Institute

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S1807-59322009000400011

Keywords:

Coronary blood flow reserve, Hypertension, Heart failure, Adenosine, Acetylcholine

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the impairment of endothelium-dependent and endothelium-independent coronary blood flow reserve after administration of intracoronary acetylcholine and adenosine, and its association with hypertensive cardiac disease. INTRODUCTION: Coronary blood flow reserve reduction has been proposed as a mechanism for the progression of compensated left ventricular hypertrophy to ventricular dysfunction. METHODS: Eighteen hypertensive patients with normal epicardial coronary arteries on angiography were divided into two groups according to left ventricular fractional shortening (FS). Group 1 (FS >;0.25): n=8, FS=0.29 ± 0.03; Group 2 (FS <0.25): n=10, FS= 0.17 ± 0.03. RESULTS: Baseline coronary blood flow was similar in both groups (Group 1: 80.15 ± 26.41 mL/min, Group 2: 100.09 ± 21.51 mL/min, p=NS). In response to adenosine, coronary blood flow increased to 265.1 ± 100.2 mL/min in Group 1 and to 300.8 ± 113.6 mL/min (p <0.05) in Group 2. Endothelium-independent coronary blood flow reserve was similar in both groups (Group 1: 3.31 ± 0.68 and Group 2: 2.97 ± 0.80, p=NS). In response to acetylcholine, coronary blood flow increased to 156.08 ± 36.79 mL/min in Group 1 and to 177.8 ± 83.6 mL/min in Group 2 (p <0.05). Endothelium-dependent coronary blood flow reserve was similar in the two groups (Group 1: 2.08 ± 0.74 and group Group 2: 1.76 ± 0.61, p=NS). Peak acetylcholine/peak adenosine coronary blood flow response (Group 1: 0.65 ± 0.27 and Group 2: 0.60 ± 0.17) and minimal coronary vascular resistance (Group 1: 0.48 ± 0.21 mmHg/mL/min and Group 2: 0.34 ± 0.12 mmHg/mL/min) were similar in both groups (p= NS). Casual diastolic blood pressure and end-systolic left ventricular stress were independently associated with FS. CONCLUSIONS: In our hypertensive patients, endothelium-dependent and endothelium-independent coronary blood flow reserve vasodilator administrations had similar effects in patients with either normal or decreased left ventricular systolic function.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2009-04-01

Issue

Section

Clinical Sciences

How to Cite

Endothelial and non-endothelial coronary blood flow reserve and left ventricular dysfunction in systemic hypertension . (2009). Clinics, 64(4), 327-335. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1807-59322009000400011