Standardization of an experimental model of intradural injection after spinal cord injury in rats

Authors

  • Olavo B. Letaif Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina. Hospital das Clinicas. Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia
  • Mauro C.M. Tavares-Júnior Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina. Hospital das Clinicas. Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia
  • Gustavo B. dos Santos Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina. Hospital das Clinicas. Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia
  • Ricardo J. R. Ferreira Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina. Hospital das Clinicas. Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia
  • Raphael M. Marcon Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina. Hospital das Clinicas. Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia
  • Alexandre F. Cristante Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina. Hospital das Clinicas. Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia
  • Tarcísio E. P. de Barros-Filho Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina. Hospital das Clinicas. Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2021/e2740

Keywords:

Spinal Cord Injury, Rats, Animal Models, Intrathecal Route

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The intrathecal route has not yet been thoroughly standardized and evaluated in an experimental model of spinal cord injury (SCI) in Wistar rats. The objective of this study was to standardize and evaluate the effect of intradural injection in this animal model. METHOD: The animals were divided into 6 groups: 1) laminectomy and intradural catheter; 2) laminectomy, intradural catheter and infusion; 3) only SCI; 4) SCI and intradural catheter; 5) SCI, intradural catheter and infusion; and 6) control (laminectomy only). Motor evaluations were performed using the Basso, Beattie and Bresnahan (BBB) scale and the horizontal ladder test; motor evoked potentials were measured for functional evaluation, and histological evaluation was performed as well. All experimental data underwent statistical analysis. RESULTS: Regarding motor evoked potentials, the groups with experimental SCI had worse results than those without, but neither dural puncture nor the injection of intrathecal solution aggravated the effects of isolated SCI. Regarding histology, adverse tissue effects were observed in animals with SCI. On average, the BBB scores had the same statistical behaviour as the horizontal ladder results, and at every evaluated timepoint, the groups without SCI presented scored significantly better than those with SCI (po0.05). The difference in performance on motor tests between rats with and without experimental SCI persisted from the first to the last test. CONCLUSIONS: The present work standardizes the model of intradural injection in experimental SCI in rats. Intrathecal puncture and injection did not independently cause significant functional or histological changes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2021-11-09

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

Standardization of an experimental model of intradural injection after spinal cord injury in rats. (2021). Clinics, 76, e2740. https://doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2021/e2740