Isokinetic muscle assessment after treatment of pectoralis major muscle rupture using surgical or non-surgical procedures

Authors

  • Anna Maria Fleury Universidade Federal de São Paulo; Departamento de Fisiologia
  • Antonio Carlos da Silva Universidade Federal de São Paulo; Departamento de Fisiologia
  • Alberto Pochini Universidade Federal de Saio Paulo; Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia
  • Benno Ejnisman Universidade Federal de Saio Paulo; Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia
  • Claudio Andre Barbosa de Lira Universidade Federal de Goias; Unidade Jatobá
  • Marilia dos Santos Andrade Universidade Federal de São Paulo; Departamento de Fisiologia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S1807-59322011000200022

Keywords:

Isokinetic exercise, exercise, muscle imbalance, muscle rupture, orthopedics rehabilitation

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Rupture of the pectoralis major muscle appears to be increasing in athletes. However, the optimal treatment strategy has not yet been established. OBJECTIVES: To compare the isokinetic shoulder performance after surgical treatment to that after non-surgical treatment for pectoralis major muscle rupture. METHODS: We assessed 33 pectoralis major muscle ruptures (18 treated non-surgically and 15 treated surgically). Horizontal abduction and adduction as well as external and internal rotation at 60 and 120 degrees/s were tested in both upper limbs. Peak torque, total work, contralateral deficiency, and the peak torque agonist-to-antagonist ratio were measured. RESULTS: Contralateral muscular deficiency did not differ between the surgical and non-surgical treatment modalities. However, the surgical group presented twice the number of athletes with clinically acceptable contralateral deficiency (<20%) for internal rotators compared to the non-surgical group. The peak torque ratio between the external and internal rotator muscles revealed a similar deficit of the external rotation in both groups and on both sides (surgical, 61.60% and 57.80% and non-surgical, 62.06% and 54.06%, for the dominant and non-dominant sides, respectively). The peak torque ratio revealed that the horizontal adduction muscles on the injured side showed similar weakness in both groups (surgical, 86.27%; non-surgical, 98.61%). CONCLUSIONS: This study included the largest single series of athletes reported to date for this type of injury. A comparative analysis of muscular strength and balance showed no differences between the treatment modalities for pectoralis major muscle rupture. However, the number of significant clinical deficiencies was lower in the surgical group than in the non-surgical group, and both treatment modalities require greater attention to the rehabilitation process, especially for the recovery of muscle strength and balance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2011-01-01

Issue

Section

Clinical Sciences

How to Cite

Isokinetic muscle assessment after treatment of pectoralis major muscle rupture using surgical or non-surgical procedures . (2011). Clinics, 66(2), 313-320. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1807-59322011000200022