A negative expiratory pressure test during wakefulness for evaluating the risk of obstructive sleep apnea in patients referred for sleep studies

Authors

  • Salvatore Romano National Research Council of Italy; Institute of Biomedicine and Molecular Immunology A. Monroy
  • Adriana Salvaggio National Research Council of Italy; Institute of Biomedicine and Molecular Immunology A. Monroy
  • Anna Lo Bue National Research Council of Italy; Institute of Biomedicine and Molecular Immunology A. Monroy
  • Oreste Marrone National Research Council of Italy; Institute of Biomedicine and Molecular Immunology A. Monroy
  • Giuseppe Insalaco National Research Council of Italy; Institute of Biomedicine and Molecular Immunology A. Monroy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S1807-59322011001100007

Keywords:

Sleep, Upper Airways, Respiratory Measurement, Screening Test

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Obstructive sleep apnea is characterized by increased upper airway collapsibility during sleep. The present study investigated the use of the negative expiratory pressure test as a method to rule out obstructive sleep apnea. METHODS: Flow limitation was evaluated in 155 subjects. All subjects underwent a diurnal negative expiratory pressure test and a nocturnal sleep study. The severity of sleep apnea was determined based on the apneahypopnea index. Flow limitation was assessed by computing the exhaled volume at 0.2, 0.5, and 1.0 s (V0.2, V0.5, and V1.0, respectively) during the application of a negative expiratory pressure and expressed as a percentage of the previous exhaled volume. Receiver-operating characteristic curves were constructed to identify the optimal threshold volume at 0.2, 0.5, and 1.0 s for obstructive sleep apnea detection. RESULTS: Mean expiratory volumes at 0.2 and 0.5 s were statistically higher (p <0.01) in healthy subjects than in all obstructive sleep apneic groups. Increasing disease severity was associated with lower expiratory volumes. The V0.2 (%) predictive parameters for the detection of sleep apnea were sensitivity (81.1%), specificity (93.1%), PPV (98.1%), and NPV (52.9%). Sensitivity and NPV were 96.9% and 93.2%, respectively, for moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea, and both were 100% for severe obstructive sleep apnea. CONCLUSION: Flow limitation measurement by V 0.2 (%) during wakefulness may be a very reliable method to identify obstructive sleep apnea when the test is positive and could reliably exclude moderate and severe obstructive sleep apnea when the test is negative. The negative expiratory pressure test appears to be a useful screening test for suspected obstructive sleep apnea.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2011-01-01

Issue

Section

Clinical Sciences

How to Cite

A negative expiratory pressure test during wakefulness for evaluating the risk of obstructive sleep apnea in patients referred for sleep studies . (2011). Clinics, 66(11), 1887-1894. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1807-59322011001100007