Earthquake-related pelvic crush fracture vs. non-earthquake fracture on digital radiography and MDCT: a comparative study

Authors

  • Tian-wu Chen Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College; Department of Radiology
  • Zhi-gang Yang Sichuan University; West China Hospital; State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy
  • Zhi-hui Dong Sichuan Province Key Laboratory of Medical Imaging
  • Si-shi Tang Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College; Department of Radiology
  • Zhi-gang Chu Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College; Department of Radiology
  • Heng Shao Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College; Department of Radiology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S1807-59322011000400018

Keywords:

Earthquake, Pelvis, Fracture, Digital radiography, Multidetector row computed tomography

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the features of earthquake-related pelvic crush fractures versus non-earthquake fractures with digital radiography and multidetector row computed tomography. METHODS: One hundred and sixty-seven survivors with pelvic crush fractures in the 2008 Sichuan earthquake were entered in our study as the earthquake-related group (139 underwent digital radiography, 28 underwent multidetector row computed tomography); 70 victims with non-earthquake pelvic fractures were enrolled into this study as the non-earthquake group (54 underwent digital radiography, 16 underwent multidetector row computed tomography). Data were reviewed retrospectively between groups, focusing on anatomic distributions, status of pelvic bone fractures, numbers of pelvic bones involved, and classification of pelvic ring fractures according to the Tile classification system. RESULTS: Pelvic fractures occurred more frequently in the pubis in the earthquake-related group than in the non-earthquake group (135/167, 81% vs. 48/70, 69%). In addition, comminuted fractures were more common in the earthquake-related group than in the non-earthquake group (55/167, 33% vs. 10/70, 14%). Multiple fractures were less common in the earthquake-related group than in the non-earthquake group (81/167, 49% vs. 46/70, 66%). Regarding the classification of pelvic ring fractures, Type C predominantly composed of subtype C3 occurred more frequently (64/167, 38% vs. 12/70, 17%), and Type A was less common in the earthquake-related group than in the non-earthquake group (31/167, 19% vs. 23/70, 32%). All differences were statistically significant (p<0.05). No difference was found in Type B fractures between the groups (72/167, 43% vs. 35/70, 50%). CONCLUSION: Earthquake-related pelvic crush fractures can be characterized by a high incidence of pelvic fractures occurring in the pubis, comminuted fractures, and Type C fractures predominantly composed by subtype C3, despite a low incidence of multiple fractures.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2011-01-01

Issue

Section

Clinical Sciences

How to Cite

Earthquake-related pelvic crush fracture vs. non-earthquake fracture on digital radiography and MDCT: a comparative study . (2011). Clinics, 66(4), 629-634. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1807-59322011000400018