Metformin, but not glimepiride, improves carotid artery diameter and blood flow in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Authors

  • Helena Atroch Machado Universidade de São Paulo; Faculdade de Medicina; Hospital das Clínicas; Laboratory of Medical Investigation
  • Marcelo Vieira Universidade de São Paulo; Faculdade de Medicina; Hospital das Clínicas; Laboratory of Medical Investigation
  • Maria Rosaria Cunha Universidade de São Paulo; Faculdade de Medicina; Hospital das Clínicas; Laboratory of Medical Investigation
  • Marcia Regina Soares Correia Universidade de São Paulo; Faculdade de Medicina; Hospital das Clínicas; Laboratory of Medical Investigation
  • Rosa Tsunechiro Fukui Universidade de São Paulo; Faculdade de Medicina; Hospital das Clínicas; Heart Institute
  • Rosa Ferreira dos Santos Universidade de São Paulo; Faculdade de Medicina; Hospital das Clínicas; Laboratory of Medical Investigation
  • Dalva Marreiro Rocha Universidade de São Paulo; Faculdade de Medicina; Hospital das Clínicas; Laboratory of Medical Investigation
  • Bernardo Leo Wajchenberg Universidade de São Paulo; Faculdade de Medicina; Hospital das Clínicas; Heart Institute
  • Silvia G. Lage Universidade de São Paulo; Faculdade de Medicina; Hospital das Clínicas; Heart Institute
  • Maria Elizabeth Rossi da Silva Universidade de São Paulo; Faculdade de Medicina; Hospital das Clínicas; Laboratory of Medical Investigation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2012(07)03

Keywords:

Treatment, Metabolic profile, Vascular reactivity, Hemostatic factors, Type 2 diabetes

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of glimepiride and metformin on vascular reactivity, hemostatic factors and glucose and lipid profiles in patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: A prospective study was performed in 16 uncontrolled patients with diabetes previously treated with dietary intervention. The participants were randomized into metformin or glimepiride therapy groups. After four months, the patients were crossed over with no washout period to the alternative treatment for an additional four-month period on similar dosage schedules. The following variables were assessed before and after four months of each treatment: 1) fasting glycemia, insulin, catecholamines, lipid profiles and HbA1 levels; 2) t-PA and PAI-1 (antigen and activity), platelet aggregation and fibrinogen and plasminogen levels; and 3) the flow indices of the carotid and brachial arteries. In addition, at the end of each period, a 12-hour metabolic profile was obtained after fasting and every 2 hours thereafter. RESULTS: Both therapies resulted in similar decreases in fasting glucose, triglyceride and norepinephrine levels, and they increased the fibrinolytic factor plasminogen but decreased t-PA activity. Metformin caused lower insulin and pro-insulin levels and higher glucagon levels and increased systolic carotid diameter and blood flow. Neither metformin nor glimepiride affected endothelial-dependent or endothelial-independent vasodilation of the brachial artery. CONCLUSIONS: Glimepiride and metformin were effective in improving glucose and lipid profiles and norepinephrine levels. Metformin afforded more protection against macrovascular diabetes complications, increased systolic carotid artery diameter and total and systolic blood flow, and decreased insulin levels. As both therapies increased plasminogen levels but reduced t-PA activity, a coagulation process was likely still ongoing.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2012-07-01

Issue

Section

Clinical Sciences

How to Cite

Metformin, but not glimepiride, improves carotid artery diameter and blood flow in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. (2012). Clinics, 67(7), 711-717. https://doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2012(07)03