Inﬂuence of the cavosurface angle on the marginal leakage of Class II composite resin restorations
Keywords:Dental Leakage, Tooth Preparation, Composite Resins, Dental Enamel.
AbstractObjective: The aim of this study was to evaluate, in vitro, the infl uence of the cavosurface angle preparation on the leakage of Class II composite-resin restorations. Methods: Fifteen sound human third molars were sectioned parallel to their long axis through the secondary groove in the buccolingual direction. The roots of the tooth halves thus obtained were embedded in acrylic resin, and Class II proximal slot cavities were prepared. The thirty specimens were then randomly divided into three groups, as follows: G1, bevel preparation; G2, chamfer preparation; G3, butt joint (no preparation on the cavity margin). Composite resin (Z350 XT) was incrementally placed in all cavities. After thermal (5000 cycles, 5°C to 55°C) and mechanical cycling (50000 cycles, 50 N), the specimens were sealed, infi ltrated with 2% methylene blue (4 h, 37°C) and sectioned in halves, which were microscopically analyzed and scored based on a scale. Statistical analyses were performed using the Kruskal-Wallis and Student-Newman-Keuls tests (α = 0.05). Results: G1 (bevel) presented signifi cantly lower microleakage than G2 (chamfer; p = 0.0158) and G3 (butt joint; p = 0.0448). There was no statistically signifi cant difference between G2 and G3 (p = 0.6844). Relevance: The results of this in vitro study suggest that a bevel preparation is able to decrease microleakage in Class II composite-resin restorations.
De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Braem M, et al. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. J Dent Res. 2005;84(2):118-32.
Soares CJ, Celiberto L, Dechichi P, Fonseca RB, Martins LR. Marginal integrity and microleakage of direct and indirect composite inlays: SEM. Braz Oral Res. 2005;19(4):295-301.
Pabis LV, Xavier TA, Rosa EF, Rodrigues FP, Meira JB, Lima RG, et al. A method to investigate the shrinkage stress developed by resin-composites bonded to a single flat surface. Dent Mater. 2012;28(4):e27-34.
Mallmann A, Zovico F, Soares M, Placido E, Ferrari M, Cardoso PE. Microtensile dentin bond strength of self-etching and single-bottle adhesive systems in different cavity configurations. J Adhes Dent. 2003;5(2):121-7.
Carvalho RM, Pereira JC, Yoshiyama M, Pashley DH. A review of polymerization contraction: the influence of stress development. Oper Dent. 1996;21(1):17-24.
Coelho-De-Souza FH, Camacho GB, Demarco FF, Powers JM. Fracture resistance and gap formation of MOD restorations: influence of restorative technique, bevel preparation and water storage. Oper Dent. 2008;33(1):37-43.
Perdigao J, Gomes G, Lopes MM. Influence of conditioning time on enamel adhesion. Quintessence Int. 2006;37(1):35-41.
Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, et al. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and. Oper Dent. 2003;28(3):215-35.
Yang B, Ludwig K, Adelung R, Kern M. Micro-tensile bond strength of three luting resins to human regional dentin. Dent Mater. 2006;22(1):45-56.
Opdam NJ, Roeters JJ, Kuijs R, Burgersdijk RC. Necessity of bevels for box only Class II composite restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;80(3):274-9.
Reis A, Pellizzaro A, Dal-Bianco K, Gones OM, Patzlaff R, Loguercio AD. Impact of adhesive application to wet and dry dentin on long-term resin-dentin. Oper Dent. 2007;32(4):380-7.
Bohaty BS, Ye Q, Misra A, Sene F, Spencer P. Posterior composite restoration update: focus on factors influencing form and function. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2013;5:33-42.
de VHL, Camacho GB, Azevedo EC, Demarco FF. Fracture resistance of thermal cycled and endodontically treated premolars with adhesive restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 2007;98(3):186-92.
Morimoto S, Vieira GF, Agra CM, Sesma N, Gil C. Fracture strength of teeth restored with ceramic inlays and overlays. Braz Dent J. 2009;20(2):143-8.
de Freitas CR, Miranda MI, de Andrade MF, Flores VH, Vaz LG, Guimaraes C. Resistance to maxillary premolar fractures after restoration of class II preparations with resin composite or ceromer. Quintessence Int. 2002;33(8):589-94.
Peixoto RT, Poletto LT, Lanza MD, Buono VT. The influence of occlusal finish line configuration on microleakage of indirect composite inlays. J Adhes Dent. 2002;4(2):145-50.
Gandhi K, Nandlal B. Effect of enamel preparations on fracture resistance of composite resin buildup of fractures involving dentine in anterior bovine teeth: an in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2006;24(2):69-75.
Coelho-de-Souza FH, Rocha Ada C, Rubini A, Klein-Junior CA, Demarco FF. Influence of adhesive system and bevel preparation on fracture strength of teeth restored with composite resin. Braz Dent J. 2010;21(4):327-31.
Bedran-De-Castro AK, Pereira PN, Pimenta LA. Long-term bond strength of restorations subjected to thermo-mechanical stresses over time. Am J Dent. 2004;17(5):337-41.
de Paula AB, Duque C, Correr-Sobrinho L, Puppin-Rontani RM. Effect of restorative technique and thermal/mechanical treatment on marginal adaptation and compressive strength of esthetic restorations. Oper Dent. 2008;33(4):434-40.
Sarabia FS, Lago ADN, Botta SB, Azevedo CS, Garone-Netto N, Mattos AB. A comparative leakage study on Er,Cr:YSGG laser- and bur- prepared Class V cavities restored with a low-shrinkage composite using different filling techniques. Braz J Oral Sci. 2013;12(2):119-124.
Mackey TK, Contreras JT, Liang BA. The Minamata Convention on Mercury: Attempting to address the global controversy of dental amalgam use and mercury waste disposal. Sci Total Environ. 2014;472:125-9.
Authors are requested to send, together with the letter to the Editors, a term of responsibility. Thus, the works submitted for appreciation for publication must be accompanied by a document containing the signature of each of the authors, the model of which is presented as follows:
I/We, _________________________, author(s) of the work entitled_______________, now submitted for the appreciation of Clinical and Laboratorial Research in Dentistry, agree that the authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Date: ____/____/____Signature(s): _______________