Institutions and economic behaviour under uncertainty
Palavras-chave:
instituições, comportamento econômico, incerteza, conhecimento, níveis de consciênciaResumo
Este texto se propõe a estabelecer a relação entre algumas contribuições do nosso entendimento das instituições com uma discussão do comportamento econômico sob incerteza, caracterizando a realidade social como sujeita a mudanças estruturais imprevisíveis.
Downloads
Referências
ADAMS, J. Economy as instituted process: change, transformation, and ptopizss. Journal ofEconomic Issues, v. 28, n. 2, p. 331-55, June 1994.
ARESTIS, P. The Rost-Keynesian approach to economics. Aldershot: Elgar, 1992.
BINMORE, K. Modeling rational players I. Economics and Philosophy, v. 3, n. 2, p. 179-214, October 1987.
BINMORE, K. De-Bayesing game theory. In: BINMORE, K., KIRMAN, A. & TANI, P. (eds.), Frontiers ofgame theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1993.
BOETTKE, P. Individuals and institutions. In: PRYCHITKO, D. (ed.), Individuals, institutions, interpretations. Aldershot: Avebury, 1995.
BOURDIEU, P. Men and machines. In: KNORR-CETINA, K. & CICOUREL, A. (eds.).Advances in social theory and methodology: toward an integration of micro- and macro- sociologies. London: Roudedge and Kegan Paul, 1981.
BROMLEY, D. Economic interests and institutions. Oxford: Blackwell, 1989.
BUTOS, W & KOPPL, R. The varieties of subjectivism: Keynes and Hayek on expectations. History of Political Economy^ v. 29, n. 2, p. 327-59, Summer 1997.
CARVALHO, E On the concept oftime in Shacklean and Sraffian economics. Journal ofPost Keynesian Economics, v. 6, n. 2, p. 265-80, Winter 1983-84.
CODDINGTON, A. Deficient foresight: a troublesome theme in Keynesian economics.American Economic Review, v. 72, n. 3, p. 480-87, June 1982.
DAVIDSON, P. Money and the real world. 2nd edition. London: Macmillan, 1978.
DAVIDSON, P. Shackle and Keynes vs. rational expectations theory and the role of time, liquidity and financial markets. In: FROWEN, S. (ed.), Unknowledge and choice in economics. London: Macmillan, 1990.
DAVIDSON, P. Austrians and Post Keynesians on economic reality: rejoinder to the critics. Critical Review, v. 7, n. 2-3, p. 423-44, 1993.
DAVIDSON, P. Reality and economic theory. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, v. 18, n. 4, p. 470-508, Summer 1996.
DENZAU, A. & NORTH, D. Shared mental models: ideologies and institutions. Kyklos, v. 47, n. 1, p. 3-31, 1994.
DEQUECH, D. Uncertainty in a strong sense: meaning and sonrces.Economic Issues, v. 2, n. 2, p. 21-43, September 1997.
DEQUECH, D. Expectations and confidence under uncertainty. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, v. 21, n. 3, p. 415-30, Spring 1999a.
DEQUECH, D. Fundamental uncertainty and ambiguity. Mimeo, University of Campinas, 1999b.
DEQUECH, D. On some arguments for the rationality of conventional behaviour under uncertainty: concepts, applicability and criticisms. In: KRIESLER, P. & SARDONI, C. (eds.), Keynes, Post-Keynesianism and political economy. London: Routiedge, 1999c.
DOSI, G. Institutions and markets in a dynamic world. The Manchester School, v. 56, n. 2, p. 119-46, June 1988.
DOW, A. & DOW, S. Animal spirits and rationality. In: LAWSON, T. & PESARAN, H. (eds.), 1985.
DOW, J. & WERLANG, S. Nash equilibrium under Knightian uncertainty: breaking down backward induction. Journal of Economic Theory, 64, 1994.
DOW, S. Alacroeconomic thought - a methodological approach. Oxford:
Blackwell, 1985.
DOW, S. Post Keynesian economics: conceptual underpinnings. British Review ofEconomic Issues, v. 10, n. 23, p. 1-18, Autumn 1988.
DOW, S. Beyond dualism. Cambridge Journal of Economics, v. 14, n. 2, p. 143-57, June 1990.
DOW, S. Keynes's epistemology and economic methodology. In: O'DONNELL, R. (ed.), Keynes as philosopher-economist. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1991.
DOW, S. & HILLARD, J. (eds.) Keynes, knowledge and uncertainty. Aldershot: Elgar, 1995.
ELSTER, J. Social norms and economic theory. Journal of Economic Perspectives, v. 3, n. 4, p. 99-117, Summer 1989.
FAVEREAU, O. Probability and uncertainty: "after all, Keynes was right". Economies et Societes, serie PE, 10, p. 133-67, 1998a.
FAVEREAU, O. La "Theorie Generale": de I'economie conventionnelle a Peconomie
des conventions. Cahiersd'EconomiePolitique, 14-15, p. 197-220,1988b.
FAVEREAU, O. Marches internes, marches externes. Revue Economique, v. 40, n. 2, p. 273-328, 1989.
FUSFELD, D. Toward a revision of the economic theory of individual hehzviot. Journal ofEconomic Issues, v. 23, n. 2, p. 357-66, June 1989.
GIDDENS, A. Central problems in social theory. London: Macmillan, 1979.
GIDDENS, A. The constitution ofsociety. Cambridge: Polity, 1984.
GORDON, W & ADAMS, J. Economics as social science: an evolutionary approach. Riverdale, MD: Riverdale, 1989.
GRANOVETTER, M. Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. AmericanJournal of Sociology, v. 91, n. 3, November 1985.
GRUCHY, A. Contemporary economic thought - the contribution of neoinstitutional
economics. Clifton, USA: Kelley', 1972.
GRUCHY, A. The reconstruction of economics. New York: Greenwood, 1987.
HICKS, J. Economic perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977.
HODGSON, G. Persuasion, expectations and the limits to Keynes. In: LAWSON, T. & PESARAN, H. (eds.), 1985.
HODGSON, G. Economics and institutions. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
HODGSON, G. Post-Keynesianism and institutionalism: the missing link. In: PHEBY, J. (ed.), New directions in Post-Keynesian economics. Aldershot: Elgar, 1989. Reprinted in HODGSON, G. After Marx and Srajfa. Basingtoke: Macmillan, 1991.
HODGSON, G. Institutional economic theory: the old versus the new. Review of Political Economy, v. 1, n. 3, p. 246-69, November 1989b.
HODGSON, G. Economics and evolution. Cambridge: Polity, 1993a.
HODGSON, G. Commentary. In: TOOL, M. (ed.), Institutional economics: theory, method, policy. Boston; Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1993b.
HODGSON, G. Comment on Pasinetti. In: DELORME, R. & DOPFER, K. (eds.), The political economy ofdiversity. Aldershot: Elgar, 1994.
ISAAC, A. Morality, maximization and economic behavior. Southern Economic Journal, v. 63, n. 3, p. 559-70, January 1997.
JENSEN, H. The theory of human nature. Journal ofEconomic Issues, v. 21, n. 3, p. 1039-73, September 1987. Reprinted in TOOL, M. (ed.), 1988.
KAPP, K. In defense of institutional economics. SwedishJournal ofEconomics, 70, p. 1-18, 1968. Reprinted in SAMUELS, W (ed.), Institutional economics, Vol. I. Aldershot: Elgar, 1988.
KEYNES, J. M. Thegeneral theory ofemployment, interest and money. London: Macmillan, 1936. 1964 edition, Harvest/HBJ.
KEYNES, J. M. The general theory of employment. QuarterlyJournal ofEconomics, 51, p. 209-23, February 1937. Reprinted in KEYNES, J. M. The collected writings ofJohn Maynard Keynes, vol. XIV London: Macmillan, 1973.
KHALIL, E. Organizations versus institutions. Journal ofInstitutional and Theoretical Economics, v. 151, n. 3, p. 445-66, 1995.
KNIGHT, E Risk, uncertainty and profit. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1921.
KNIGHT, J. Social institutions and human cognition.ofInstitutional and Theoretical Economics, v. 153, n. 4, p. 693-99, December 1997.
LANGLOIS, R. Knowledge and rationality in the Austrian school: an analytical survey. Eastern Economic Journal, v. 9, n. 4, p. 309-330, October-December 1985.
LANGLOIS, R. The new institutional economics; an introductory essay. In:
LANGLOIS, R. {ed.). Economics as aprocess: essays in the new institutional economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.
LANGLOIS, R. {ed.). What is wrong with the old institutional economics (and what is
still wrong with the new)? Review of Political Economy, v. 1, n. 3, p. 270-98, November 1989.
LAWSON, T. Uncertainty and economic analysis. Economic Journal, 95, p. 909-27, December 1985.
LAWSON, T. The relative/absolute nature of knowledge and economic analysis. Economic Journal, 97, p. 951-70, December 1987.
LAWSON, T. Economics and expectations. In: DOW, S. & HILLARD, J. (eds.), 1995.
Economics and reality. London: Roudedge, 1997.
LAWSON, T. & PESARAN, H. (eds.) Keynes) economics - methodological issues. Armonk, NY: Sharpe, 1985.
LECQ, E van der. Conventions and institutions in coordination problems. De Economist, v. 144, n. 3, p. 397-428, October 1996.
LEIBENSTEIN, H. On the economics of conventions and institutions: an exploratory essay. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, v. 40, n. 1, p. 74-86, 1984.
LEWIS, D. Convention: a philosophical study. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1969.
LO, K. Equilibrium in beliefs under uncertainty. Journal ofEconomic Theory, 1996.
MAKI, U. Economics with institutions: agenda for methodological inquiry. In: MAKI, U., GUSTAFSSON, B. & KNUDSEN, C. (eds.), 1993.
MAKI, U., GUSTAFSSON, B. & KNUDSEN, C. (eds.) Rationality, institutions and economic methodology. New York: Routiedge, 1993.
MAYHEW, A. Culture: core concept under attack. Journal ofEconomic Issues, v. 21, n. 3, p. 587-603, June 1987.
MAYHEW, A. Contrasting origins of the two institutionalisms; the social science
context. Review of Political Economy, v. 1, n. 3, p. 319-33, November 1989.
McKENNA, E. & ZANNONI, D. Philosophical foundations of Post Keynesian economics. Journal ofPost Keynesian Economics, v. 15, n. 3, p. 395-407, Spring 1993.
MEEKS, J. G. Keynes on the rationality of decision procedures under uncertainty: the investment decision. In: MEEKS, J. G. (ed.),
Thoughtful economic man. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
MILLER. E. Institutional economics: philosophy, methodology and theory. The Social Science Journal, v. 15, n. 1, p. 13-25, January 1978.
MIROWSKI, P. Institutions as a solution concept in a game theory context. In: MIROWSKI, P. (ed.). The reconstruction ofeconomic theory. Boston; Kluwer, 1986.
NEALE, W Institutions. Journal of Economic Issues, v. 21, n. 3, p. 1177-
, September 1987. Reprinted in TOOL, M. (ed.), 1988.
NELSON, R. & WINTER, S. An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982.
NEWMAN, G. An institutional perspective on information. International Social Science Journal, v. 28, n. 3, p. 466-92, 1976.
NORTH, D. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
PETERSON, W. Income, employment, and economic growth. New York: Norton, 1984.
ROTHEIM, R. Organicism and the role ofthe individual in Keynes's thought. Journal ofPost Keynesian Economics, v. 12, n. 2, p. 316-26, 1989-90.
ROTHEIM, R. Keynes on uncertainty and individual behaviour within a theory of effective demand. In: DOW, S. & HILLARD, J. (eds.), 1995.
RUTHERFORD, M. Some issues in the comparison of Austrian and institutional economics. Research in the History ofEconomic Thought and Methodology, 6, p. 159-72, 1989a.
RUTHERFORD, M. What is wrong with the new institutional economics (and what is
still wrong with the old)? Review ofPolitical Economy, v. 1, n. 3, p. 299-318, 1989b.
RUTHERFORD, M. Institutions in economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
SAMUELS, W The old versus the new institutionalism. Review ofPolitical Economy, v. 2, n. 1, p. 83-86, 1990a.
RUTHERFORD, M. Institutional economics and the theory of cognition. Cambridge Journal ofEconomics, v. 14, n. 2, p. 219-27, June 1990b.
SCHOTTER, A. The economic theory of social institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.
SCREPANTI, E. Relative rationality, institutions and precautionary behaviour. In: GROENEWEGEN, J., PITELIS, C. & SJOSTRAND, S. (eds.), On economic institutions. Aldershot: Elgar, 1995.
SHACKLE, G. Epistemics and economics. Cambridge; Cambridge University Press, 1972.
STREIT, M., MUMMERT, U. & KIWIT, D. Views and comments on cognition, rationality, and institutions. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 153, 1997.
TOOL, M. (ed.), Evolutionary economics - Volume I: Foundations ofinstitutional thought. Armonk, NY: Sharpe, 1988.
VANBERG, V. Rational choice, rule-following and institutions; an evolutionary perspective. In: MAKI, U., GUSTAFSSON, B. 8c KNUDSEN, C. (eds.), 1993.
YOUNG, H. P. The economics ofconvention.Journal ofEconomic Perspectives, v. 10, n. 2, p. 105-22, Spring 1996.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 1999 David Dequech
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
A submissão de artigo autoriza sua publicação e implica o compromisso de que o mesmo material não esteja sendo submetido a outro periódico.
A revista não paga direitos autorais aos autores dos artigos publicados.
O detentor dos direitos autorais da revista é o Departamento de Economia da Faculdade de Economia, Administração, Contabilidade e Atuária da Universidade de São Paulo.
