Monetary reform credibility: some evidence for Brazil

Autores

  • Fabiana Rocha Autor

Palavras-chave:

credibilidade, restrição orçamentária do governo, probabilidade subjetiva, planos cruzado e collor

Resumo

O objefivo desse artigo e discufir a credibilidade de duos reformas de combate a inflagao adotadas no Brasil: os Pianos Cruzado e Collor. Assume-se que a origem do problema de credibilidade vem da interagdo entre as auforidades monetdria e fiscal estabelecida pela resfrigdo orgamenfdria infertemporal. Credibilidade e definida como
a probabilidade subjetiva de que o governo esta seguindo as politicas por ele anunciadas. Os resultados obfidos indicam que ambas as reformas monetdrias encorajaram uma polJfica para a autoridade monetdria, que seria apropriada para um regime ricardiano, mas estabeleceram pianos de imposfos e gastos que seriam facfiveis
somenfe num regime de domindncia fiscal. Tais politicas monetdria e fiscal sdo, contudo, incompatfveis. Ndo e factivel levar adiante ambas ao mesmo tempo e isso explica a baixa credibilidade global e, em ultima instdncia, o fracasso, das duos reformas economicas.

Downloads

Os dados de download ainda não estão disponíveis.

Referências

AGENOR, P. R. & TAYLOR, M. P. Testing for credibility effects. IMF Staff Papers^ 39, p. 545-71, 1992.

BACKUS, D. & DRIFILL, J. Rational expectations and policy credibility following a change in regime. Review ofEconomic Studies, 52, p. 211-22, 1985a.

AGENOR, P. R. Inflation and rcpnteEon-American EconomicReview, 75, p. 503-38,1985b.

BARRO, R. J. & GORDON, D. B. A positive theory ofmonetary policy in a natural rate modc. Journal ofPolitical Economy, 91, p. 589-610, 1983a.

BARRO, R. J. Rules, discretion and reputation in a model ofmonetary policy.Journal ofMonetary Economics, 12, p. 101-22, 1983b.

BARRO, R. J. Developments in the theory of rules versus discretion. In:

BARRO, R. ]. Macvoeconomicpolicy. Harvard University Press, 1990.

BAXTER, M. The role ofexpectations in stabilization policy.Journal ofMonetary Economics, 15, p. 343-62, 1985.

BLACKBURN, K. & CHRISTENSEN, M. Monetary policy and policy credibility: theories and evidence. Journal ofEconomic Literature, v. XXVTI, p. 1-45, 1989.

BLANCHARD, O. J. The Lucas critique and the Volcker dtftzxion.American Economic Review, 74, p. 211-15,1984.

CHRISTENSEN, M. Disinflation, credibility and price inertia. Applied Economics, 19, p. 1353-66, 1987a.

BLANCHARD, O. J. On interest rate determination, testing for policy credibility, and the Lucas cr'tcuc. EuropeanJournal ofPoliticalEconomy, 3, p. 369-88,1987b.

CROUSHORE, D. & KOOT, R. S. A measure of Federal Reserve credibility Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, Working Paper n. 91-1, 1991.

CUKIERMAN, A. Central Bank behavior and credibility: some recent theoretical developments. Federal Reserve Bank ofSt. Louis Review, 68, p. 5-17,1986.

CUKIERMAN, A. Central Bank strategy, credibility, and independence: theory and evidence. The MIT Press, 1992. '

CUKIERMAN, A., KIGUEL, M. & LIVIATAN, N. How much to commit to an exchange rate rule: balancing credibility andflexibility. The World Bank, July, WPS 931, 1992.

CUKIERMAN, A., WEBB, S. & NEYAPTI, B. Measuring the independence of Central Banks and its effects on policy outcomes. The World Bank Economic Review, 6, p. 353-98, 1992.

FISCHER, S. Rules versus discretion in monetary policy In: FRIEDMAN,

B. M. & HAHN, F. H. (eds.), Handbook ofmonetary economics, vol. 11. Elsevier Science Publishers, 1990.

GEWEKE, J. Exact inference in the inequality constrained normal linear regression model. Journal ofApplied Econometrics, 1, p. 127-41, 1986.

GRIFFITHS,W E. Bayesian econometrics and how to get rid ofthose wrong signs. Review ofMarketing andAgricultural Economics, 56, p. 36-56,1988.

JUDGE, G., HILL, R., GRIFFITHS, W, LUTKEPOHL, H. & LEE, T. Introduction to the theory andpractice ofeconometrics. Wiley, 1988.

KYDLAND, F. & PRESCOTT, E. C. Rules rather than discretion: the inconsistency of optimal plans. Journal ofPolitical Economy, 85, p. 473- 91, 1977.

MASCIANDARO, D., & TABELLINI, G. Monetary regimes and fiscal deficits: a comparative analyisis./w; CHENG, H. S. (ed.),Monetarypolicy inpacific basin countries. Doredrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1988.

NOVAES, A. D. Essays on inflation and stabilization in Brazil. Doctoral dissertation, University of California at Berkeley 1990.

PASTORE, A. C. Deficit publico, a sustentabilidade do crescimento das dividas interna e externa, senhoriagem e infla^ao: uma analise do regime monetario hrasilciro. Revista de Econometria, 14, p. 135-154, 1995.

ROCHA, E F. Monetary regimes and macroeconomicpolicy: an empirical analysis ofthe Brazilian economy. Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1995.

SARGENT, T. J. & WALLACE, N. Some unpleasant monetarist arithmetic. Federal Reserve Bank ofMinneapolisQuartely Review, Fall, p. 1-17, 1981.

SARGENT, T J. Reaganomics and credibility. In: SARGENT, T. {cd.). Rational expectations and inflation. Second Edition. Harper Collins College Publishers, 1993.

Downloads

Publicado

01-09-1997

Edição

Seção

Não definida

Como Citar

Rocha, F. (1997). Monetary reform credibility: some evidence for Brazil. Estudos Econômicos (São Paulo), 27(3), 441-459. https://www.revistas.usp.br/ee/article/view/161258