O impacto do Duolingo no desenvolvimento da competência linguística dos alunos: um aspecto das competências linguísticas comunicativas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-4634202349252467engPalavras-chave:
Duolingo, M-learning, Ensino superior, Competência linguística, Aquisição de segunda língua ; Competências comunicativas, Aquisição de segunda língua, Competências comunicativasResumo
Este documento relata o impacto de um tipo de m-learning no desenvolvimento da competência linguística e comunicativa dos estudantes em inglês como segunda língua. Este estudo é um caso mexicano que usa Duolingo para melhorar cursos virtuais voltados para estudantes do ensino superior cuja língua materna é o espanhol. Trata-se de uma pesquisa quase-experimental que analisou resultados pré e pós-testes em uma amostra de 40 participantes (grupo controle de 20 participantes e grupo experimental de 20 participantes). Os instrumentos de medição foram projetados para este estudo específico e se concentraram em testar os seis componentes da competência linguística de acordo com o CEFR no nível A2 (2018). Um teste piloto foi conduzido anteriormente e os coeficientes de pré-teste (0,81) e pós-teste (0,98) foram considerados aceitáveis de acordo com o Alfa de Cronbach. Este estudo abordou as seguintes questões: a) Como o Duolingo contribui para o desenvolvimento da competência linguística de estudantes do ensino superior e apoia a aprendizagem do inglês em cursos virtuais através da metodologia m-learning?; e b) Quais componentes foram melhorados na competência linguística do estudante após o uso do Duolingo? Os resultados revelaram uma profunda melhoria nos participantes do grupo experimental. O resultado pós-teste do grupo experimental foi superior (M=43,75) em comparação ao grupo controle (M=30,35), principalmente no controle fonológico (+5,20) e no controle ortográfico (+2,65), cuja pontuação aumentou ligeiramente, o que se atribui principalmente às suas aulas virtuais de inglês.
Downloads
Referências
AL SAMARRAIE, Hosam. A scoping review of videoconferencing systems in higher education: learning paradigms, opportunities, and challenges. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, Athabasca, v. 20, n. 3, p. 121-140, 2019.
AZAR, Ali Sorayyaei; NASIRI, Hassan. Learners’ attitudes toward the effectiveness of mobile assisted language learning (MALL) in L2 listening comprehension. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, Oxford, v. 98, p. 11836-11843, 2014.
BÁRCENA, Elena et al. State of the art of language learning design using mobile technology: sample apps and some critical reflection. In: EUROCALL CONFERENCE, 22., 2015, Padova. Proceedings […]. Voillans: Research-publishing.net, 2015. p. 36-43.
BENATI, Alessandro. Second language acquisition. In: FÄCKE, Christiane (ed.). Manual of language acquisition. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2014. p. 179-197.
BISQUERRA, Rafael. Metodología de la investigación educativa. v. 1. Madrid: La Muralla, 2004.
CASTRO, Ana Paula de; HORA MACEDO, Suzana da; PINTO BASTOS, Hélvia Pereira. Duolingo: an experience in English teaching. Journal of Educational and Instructional Studies, Turkey, v. 6, n. 4, p. 59-64, 2016.
CHO, Kyunghwa et al. The effects of using mobile devices on student achievement in language learning: A meta-analysis. Education Sciences, Basel, v. 8, n. 3, p. 13-15, 2018.
CHOMSKY, Noam. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1965. (Special technical report; v. 11).
COE. Council of Europe. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Companion Volume with new descriptors. Strasburg: Council of Europe, 2018.
DUKIC, Zvjezdana; CHIU, Dickson KW; LO, Patrick. How useful are smartphones for learning? Perceptions and practices of Library and Information Science students from Hong Kong and Japan. Library Hi Tech, Bingley, v. 33, n. 4, p. 545-561, 2015.
DUOLINGO INC. Duolingo. Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language, Berkeley, v. 19, n. 1, p. 1-9, 2015.Available at:http://www.tesl-ej.org/pdf/ej73/m1.pdf Access in: 17 jun. 2022.
» http://www.tesl-ej.org/pdf/ej73/m1.pdf
FRÍAS NAVARRO, Dolores. Apuntes de consistencia interna de las puntuaciones de un instrumento de medida. Valencia: University of Valencia, 2019. Available at: https://www.uv.es/~friasnav/AlfaCronbach.pdf Access in: 29 jun. 2022
» https://www.uv.es/~friasnav/AlfaCronbach.pdf
FRIEDRICH, Patricia. Communicative competence. New York: Routledge, 2012.
GAFNI, Ruti; ACHITUV, Dafni Biran; RACHMANI, Gila. Learning foreign languages using mobile applications. Journal of Information Technology Education, Santa Rosa, v. 16, n. 1, p. 301-317, 2017.
GLOMO NARZOLES, Danebeth Tristeza. Classroom communication climate and communicative linguistic competence of EFL learners. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, London, v. 3, n. 3, p. 404-410, 2013.
GOMES, Nelson; LOPES, Sérgio; ARAÚJO, Sílvia. Mobile learning: a powerful tool for ubiquitous language learning. In: PAREJA-LORA, Antonio; CALLE-MARTÍNEZ, Cristina; RODRÍGUEZ-ARAGON, Pilar (ed.). New perspectives on teaching and working with languages in the digital era. Dublin: Research-publishing, 2016. p. 189-200.
GONZÁLEZ, Rosa María Isasi; DEL CARMEN MEDINA, Gladys. Uso de dispositivos móviles como herramientas para aprender TT. Píxel-Bit, Sevilla, n. 52, p. 217-227, 2018.Available at:https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/pixel/article/view/62533. Access in: 17 jun. 2022.
» https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/pixel/article/view/62533.
HALL, Graham. Exploring English language teaching. Oxon: Routledge, 2011.
HOLFESTER, Chris. Teaching English as a second language: English as a foreign language. New York: Salem Press Encyclopedia, 2019.
HSUAN YAU, Lai. University student perceptions of learning English as an international language. The International Journal of Learning in Higher Education, [S. l.], v. 26, n. 2, p. 57-72, 2019.
HYMES, Dell. Competence and performance in linguistic theory. In: HUXLEY, Renira; INGRAM, Elisabeth (ed.). Language acquisition: models and methods. New York: Academic Press, 1971. p. 3-28.
HYMES, Dell. On communicative competence. In: PRIDE, John B.; HOLMES, Janet (ed.). Sociolinguistics: selected readings. London: Penguin Books, 1972. p. 269-293.
KENT, Andrea M.; SIMPSON, Jennifer L. Interactive videoconferencing: connecting theory to practice for preservice teachers. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, Waynesville, v. 27, n. 1, p. 12-21, 2010.
KLOCKARS, Alan J. Evaluating pretest-posttest control group experiments. Perceptual and Motor Skills, Thousand Oaks, v. 75, n. 1, p. 96-98, 1992.
KNAPP, Karlfried; SEIDLHOFER, Barbara; WIDDOWSON, Henry George (ed.). Handbook of foreign language communication and learning. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2009.
KUKULSKA-HULME, Agnes. Will mobile learning change language learning? ReCall, Cambridge, v. 21, n. 2, p. 157-165, 2009.
KUMAR BASAK, Sujit; WOTTO, Marguerite; BELANGER, Paul. E-learning, M-learning and D-learning: conceptual definition and comparative analysis. E-Learning and Digital Media, Thousand Oaks, v. 5, n. 4, p. 191-216, 2018.
LAI, Chun; YEUNG, Yuk; HU, Jingjing. University student and teacher perceptions of teacher roles in promoting autonomous language learning with technology outside the classroom. Computer Assisted Language Learning, Cambridge, v. 29, n. 4, p. 703-723, 2016.
LENKE, Joanne M. et al. Differences between kuder-richardson formula 20 and formula 21 reliability coefficients for short tests with different item variabilities. In: ANNUAL MEETING OF THE AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATION, 61., 1977, New York. Anais… New York: ERIC, 1977.Available at: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED141411.pdf. Access in: 29 jun. 2022.
» https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED141411.pdf
MARTINOVIC, Dragana; MAGLIARO, Jelena; PUGH, Timothy. Pedagogy for mobile ICT learning using videoconferencing technology. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management, [S. l.], v. 5, p. 375-394, 2010. Available at: https://www.questia.com/library/journal/1G1-247880129/pedagogy-for-mobile-ict-learning-using-video-conferencing.Access in: 17 jun. 2022.
MOSPAN, Natalia. Mobile teaching and learning English: a multinational perspective. Teaching English with Technology, [S. l.], v. 18, n. 4, p. 105-125, 2018.Available at: http://cejsh.icm.edu.pl/cejsh/element/bwmeta1.element.desklight-263522eb-dbc5-4ee6-b561-519e55b8ca57.Access in: 17 jun. 2022.
» http://cejsh.icm.edu.pl/cejsh/element/bwmeta1.element.desklight-263522eb-dbc5-4ee6-b561-519e55b8ca57
MUNDAY, Pilar. The case for using Duolingo as part of the language classroom experience. Ried, Madrid, v. 19, n. 1, p. 83-101, 2016.
MUYINDA, Paul B. MLearning: pedagogical, technical and organizational hypes and realities. Campus-Wide Information Systems, Bingley, v. 24, n. 2, p. 97-104, 2007.
PARK, Seongwon; KIM, Kwangeak; LEE, Bong Gyou. Future information technology. In: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUTURE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 6., 2011, Crete. Proceedings... Crete: FutureTech2011, 2011. p. 62-71.
PEDRO, Luís Francisco Mendes Gabriel; BARBOSA, Cláudia Marina Mónica de Oliveira; SANTOS, Carlos Manuel das Neves. A critical review of mobile learning integration in formal educational contexts. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, [S. l.], v. 15, n. 1, p. 10, 2018.
PLATT, Carrie Anne; AMBER, N. W. Raile; YU, Nan. Virtually the same?: Student perceptions of the equivalence of online classes to face-to-face classes. Merlot Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, New York, v. 10, n. 3, p. 489-503, 2014.
RASSKAZOVA, Tatiana et al. Challenges of teaching a blended English course to university students. In: THE INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE ELEARNING AND SOFTWARE FOR EDUCATION, 13., 2017, Bucharest. Proceedings… Bucharest: Else, 2017. p. 303-308.
RICKHEIT, Gert; STROHNER, Hans (ed.). Handbook of communication competence. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2008.
SHYAM, Narayanan. Virtual classrooms as an alternative platform. Singapore: Centre for Instructional Technology National University of Singapore, 2012.
TAHIR, Ismail. Teachers’ beliefs in balancing linguistic competence and teaching performance in EFL classrooms. Brain, Iasi, v. 9, n. 1, p. 50-58, 2018.
TOMLINSON, Brian; WHITTAKER, Claire. Blended learning in English language teaching: course design and implementation. London: British Council, 2013.
TRISTÁN-LÓPEZ, Agustín. Modificación al modelo de Lawshe para el dictamen cuantitativo de la validez de contenido de un instrumento objetivo. Avances en Medición, Bogotá, v. 6, n. 1, p. 37-48, 2008. Available at:https://www.humanas.unal.edu.co/lab_psicometria/application/files/9716/0463/3548/VOL_6._Articulo4_Indice_de_validez_de_contenido_37-48.pdf.Access in: 29 jun. 2022.
VALENZUELA GONZÁLEZ, Jaime Ricardo; FLORES FAHARA, Manuel. Fundamentos de investigación educativa. Mexico, DC: Digital Tecnológico de Monterrey, 2013.
YANG, Bowen; ZHOU, Shijun; JU, Weijie. Learning English speaking through mobile-based role-plays: the exploration of a mobile English language learning app called Engage. The EuroCall Review, Valencia, v. 21, n. 2, p. 27, 2013.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2023 Educação e Pesquisa
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
A publicação do artigo em Educação e Pesquisa implica, automaticamente, por parte do(s) autor(es) a cessão integral e exclusiva dos direitos autorais da primeira edição para a revista, sem quaisquer honorários.
Após a primeira publicação, os autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais, independentes da revista, para a divulgação do trabalho por outros meios (ex.: repositório institucional ou capítulo de livro), desde que citada a fonte completa, com as referências da mesma autoria e dos dados da publicação original.
As ideias e opiniões expressas no artigo são de exclusiva responsabilidade do autor, não refletindo, necessariamente, as opiniões da revista.
