Intuition, belief, and immediate knowledge: Jacobi, Fichte and Schelling between Hegel’s Faith und Knowledge and his Lectures on History of Philosophy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2318-9800.v28i2p13-22Keywords:
Faith, Intellectual intuition, Immediate knowledge, Method, Post-KantianismAbstract
The aim of this article is to indicate that in Fichte’s critique in Faith and Knowledge, referred to Jacobi's notion of believe, one can already glimpse Hegel's position in Lessons on the History of Philosophy on the link between Schelling and Jacobi, with regard to the notions of intellectual intuition and immediate knowledge.
Downloads
References
Brandão, E. (2021). Skepticism and Negation in the Young Hegel: Schulze, Fichte and Nihilism. In: Rosaleny, V.R., Smith, P.J. (eds). Sceptical Doubt and Disbelief in Modern European Thought. International Archives of the History of Ideas Archives internationales d’histoire des idées, vol. 233. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55362-3_15.
Brueggen, M. (1967). La critique de Jacobi par Hegel dans « Foi et savoir ». Archives de Philosophie, 30(2), 187-198.
Hegel, G. W. F. (1970). Werke in 20 Bänden. Frankfurt-am-Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.
Hegel, G. W. F. (2007). Fé e saber. Tradução e introdução: Oliver Tolle. São Paulo: Hedra.
Hegel, G. W. F. (1955). Lecciones sobre La historia de la filosofia III. Trad. Wenceslao Roces. México: Fondo de Cultura econômica.
Hegel, G. W. F. (2003). Diferença entre os sistemas filosóficos de Fichte e Schelling. Tradução, introdução e notas de Carlos Morujão. Lisboa: Imprensa Nacional – Casa da Moeda.
Janke, W. (2000). Glauben und Wissen. Ein Betrag zur Schellingskontroverse in Fichtes Erlanger Wissenschaftslehre 1805. In Asmuth, C.; Denker, A.; Vater. M. (orgs.). Schelling: zwischen Fichte und Hegel. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Grüner.
Jonkers, P. (2003). True faith in “Faith and Knowledge”. In Hegel-Jahrbuch. Erster Teil. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
Königson, M-J. (1976). La notion de « Glauben » dans l’article Foi et Savoir de Hegel. Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale, 81e Année, 2, 209-220.
Kosian, J. (2003). Glauben und Wissen in Hegels Theologischen Jugendschriften. In Hegel-Jahrbuch. Erster Teil. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
Lebrun, G. (2006); de Moura, C. A. R. de, Cacciola, M. L., Kawano, M (orgs.). A antinomia e seu conteúdo. In A filosofia e sua história: Gérard Lebrun. São Paulo: Cosac Naify.
Radrizzani, I. (2018). Die Bestimmung des Menschen: Fichtes Antwort auf Jacobis Brief an ihn. In Fichte-Studien Band 45. Mit Fichte philosophieren Perspektiven seiner Philosophie nach 200 Jahren. Herausgegeben von Matteo Vincenzo d’Alfonso Thomas Kisser Petra Lohmann Jacinto Rivera de Rosales. Leiden/Boston: Rodopi.
Schelling – Hegel. (2007). Correspondencia completa. Trad. Hugo Ochoa e Raul Gutierrez. Revista de prepublicaciones del Instituto de Estudios Filosóficos Leonardo Polo. Serie Especial, 15. Versão digital.
Stewart, J. (2018). Hegel And Jacobi: The debate about immediate knowing. The Heytrhrop Journal, LIX, 761-769.
Thibodeau, M. (2003). Hegel’s critique de Fichte : Foi, savoir et volonté. Hegel-Jahrbuch 2003. Dritter Teil. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
Tilliette, X. (1968). Hegel et Schelling à Lena. Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale, 73e Année, 2, 149-166.
Tilliette, X. (1980). Hegel in Jena als Mitarbeiter Schellings. In Hegel-Studien. Beiheft 20. Hrg. Von Dieter Heinrich u. Klaus Düsing. Bonn: Bouvier.
Vaysse, J-M. (1994). Totalité et Subjectivité. Spinoza dans l’idéalisme allemand. Paris : J. Vrin.
Wilson, E. E. (2003). “Absolute Identity” and Hegel’s Treatment of Concepts and Intuitions in “Glauben und Wissen”. Hegel-Jahrbuch 2003. Zweiter Teil. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 102 a 107.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Eduardo Brandão
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Information and conceptions on the texts are complete responsibility of the authors.
All the articles submitted before July 5th 2018 and those published after July 2021 are licensed under a CC BY-NC-ND license – except those published between the aforementioned dates, which are under the CC BY-NC-SA license. The permission for the translation of the material published under the license CC BY-NC-ND by third parts can be obtained with the consent of the author.
Open access policies - Diadorim
Rules applied before July 5th 2018:
Presenting a submission to our Editorial Board implies granting priority of publication for “Cadernos de filosofia alemã”, as well as transferring the copyright of texts (once published), which will be reproduced only with the manifest authorization of the editors. Authors keep the right to reuse the texts published in future editions of their work, without paying any fees to "Cadernos”. We will not grant the permission to re-edit or translate the texts for third parts without agreement of the author.
