Traces of the Platonic Theory of Evil in the Theaetetus
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1981-9471.v11i1p66-98Keywords:
Plato, evil, Theaetetus, Timaeus, goodAbstract
The purpose of this article is to offer analysis of the passage on evil in the Theaetetus 176a4-8. I submit that it stands in anticipatory relation to Plato’s mature theory of evil, as it can be deduced from the Timaeus. My assumption is that in the Theaetetus passage two contrary principles are postulated, one of which is the cause of good, while the other is the cause of evil. In order to support that assumption, I shall argue that a) Plato’s doctrine of the Forms is present in the Theaetetus Digression; b) the word ‘good’ at 176a6 refers to Plato’s highest entity – αὐτὸ ἀγαθόν; c) τὰ κακά of 176a5 are not to be identified with the opposite of τὸ ἀγαθόν mentioned in the same line; d) the ὑπεναντίον of 176a6, the subordinated opposite of τὸ ἀγαθόν, and the second ἀνάγκη in the passage (176a8) could denote the same entity, i.e. the Timaean NecessityDownloads
References
Archer-Hind, Richard D. The Timaeus of Plato: Edited with Introduction and Notes. London: Macmillan and Co., 1888.
Armstrong, Arthur Hilary. (tr.). Plotinus: Ennead III. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1993.
Betegh, Gabor. “Tale, Theology and Teleology in the Phaedo”. In Partenie, Catalin (ed.) Plato's Maths. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009
Bostock, David. Plato’s Theaetetus. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198239307.001.0001
Brandwood, Leonard. “Stylometry and Chronology”. In Kraut, Richard (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Plato, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992. DOI: /10.1017/ccol0521430186.003
Brisson, Luc. Plato the Myth Maker. Naddaf, Gerard. (ed., tr.), Chicago: the University of Chicago Press, 1998
Burnet, John. Plato’s Phaedo: Edited with Introduction and Notes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1911
Burnyeat, Myles Fredric. The Theaetetus of Plato, Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, 1990
Carpenter, Amber D. “Embodying Intelligence: Animals and Us in Plato’s Timaeus”. In Dillon, John, and Zovko, Marie-Elise (eds.). Platonism and Forms of Intelligence. Berlin: Academie Verlag, 2008
Chappell, Timothy. Reading Plato’s Theaetetus. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, 2004.
Cherniss, Harold. “The Philosophical Economy of the Theory of Ideas”. The American Journal of Philology 57. 4 (1936), pp. 445-456. DOI: 10.2307/290396
Cherniss, Harold. “The Sources of Evil According to Plato”. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 98. 1 (1954), pp. 23-30.
Cherniss, Harold. “The Relation of the Timaeus to Plato’s Later Dialogues”. The American Journal of Philology 78. 3 (1957), pp. 225-266. DOI: 10.2307/292120
Collobert, Catherine, Destree, Pierre and Gonzales, Francisco J. (eds.). Plato and Myth: Studies on the Use and Status of Platonic Myths. Leiden: Brill, 2012. DOI: 10.1163/9789004224360 .
Cornford, Francis MacDonald. Plato’s Theory of Knowledge, London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner and Co. Ltd., 1935.
Cooper, John M. “Plato on Sense-Perception and Knowledge (‘Theaetetus’ 184-186)”. Phronesis, 15. 2 (1970), pp. 123-146. DOI: 10.1163/156852870x00107
England, Edwin Bourdieu (ed., tr.) The Laws of Plato, Vols. I-II. Manchester: University Press, 1921.
Gallop, David. Plato: Phaedo, Translated with Notes. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975
Greene, William Chase. “Fate, Good and Evil in Pre-Socratic Philosophy”. Harvard Studies in Classical Philology, 47 (1936), pp. 85-129. DOI: 10.2307/310572
Guthrie, William Keith Chambers. A History of Greek Philosophy V: The Later Plato and the Academy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978.
Hackforth, Reginald. “Platonic Forms in the Theaetetus”. The Classical Quarterly, 7. 1-2. (1957), pp. 53-58. DOI: 10.1017/s0009838800016591
Hick, John. Evil and the God of Love, 3rd reissue. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010. DOI: 10.1057/9780230283961
Kennedy, Benjamin Hall. The Theaetetus of Plato: with Translation and Notes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1881
Klein, Jacob. Plato’s Trilogy: Theaetetus, the Sophist and the Statesman. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1977
McDowell, John. Plato: Theaetetus, Translated with Notes. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1973
O’Brien, Dominic. “Plotinus on Matter and Evil”. In Gerson Lloyd P. (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Plotinus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996. DOI: 10.1017/ccol0521470935.008
Owen, Gwilym Ellis Lane. “The Place of the Timaeus in Plato’s Dialogues”. The Classical Quarterly 3. 1/2 (1953), pp. 79-95. DOI: 10.1017/s0009838800002652
Plantinga, Alvin. “De Re et De Dicto”. Nous, 3. 3 (1969), pp. 235-258. DOI: 10.2307/2214550
Robinson, Richard. “Forms and Error in Plato’s Theaetetus”. Philosophical Review, 59. 1 (1950), pp. 3-30. DOI: 10.2307/2181445
Rowe, Christopher James (ed.). Plato: Phaedo. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
Sedley, David. “Three Platonist Interpretations of the Theaetetus”. In Gill, Christopher and McCabe, Mary Margaret (eds.), Form and Argument in Later Plato. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.
Sedley, David. The Midwife of Platonism: Text and Subtext in Plato’s Theaetetus. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2004. DOI: 10.1093/0199267030.001.0001
Stern, Paul. “The Philosophical Importance of Political Life: On the ‘Digression” in Plato’s ‘Theaetetus’”. The American Political Science Review, 96. 2 (2002), pp. 275-289. DOI: 10.1017/s0003055402000163
Tschemplik, Andrea. Knowledge and Self-Knowledge in Plato’s Theaetetus. Plymouth: Lexington Books, 2008.
Taylor, Alfred. E. Plato, the Man and His Work. London: Methuen, 1926. DOI: 10.4324/9780203101377
Taylor, Alfred. A Commentary on Plato’s Timaeus. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1928.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC By 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
