Seneca's Medea and De ira: justice and revenge


  • Rodrigo Sebastián Braicovich Universidad Nacional de Rosario



Roman Stoicism, psychology of action, intellectualism, tolerance, forgiveness


I try to show Seneca’s Medea provides us with two elements -which, as far as I am aware, have not received proper attention- that complement his approach to the phenomenon of anger and can improve our understanding of the Stoic psychology of action defended in De ira. The first element is linked to the question of whether the angry person is responsive to reasons or not; the second one concerns the question of indifference, tolerance and forgiveness, and addresses the issue of Medea's inability to conceive of a more appropriate or desirable irtreaction to Jason’s offense than anger.


Download data is not yet available.


Aygon, J.-P. 2000. “Le jeu des passions dans la Médée de Sénèque (v. 893-971).” Vita Latina 160 (1).21–31.

Berry, J. M. 2001. “The Dramatic Incarnation of Will in Seneca’s Medea.” Journal of Dramatic Theory and Criticism 10 (2).3–18.

Chaumartin, F.-R. 2014. “Philosophical Tragedy?” In Brill’s Companion to Seneca. Philosopher and Dramatist, edited by Gregor Damschen and Andreas Hei. Leiden. 653–68.

Gill, C.. 1983. “Did Chrysippus Understand Medea?” Phronesis 28.136–49.

Gill, C. 1987. “Two Monologues of Self-Division: Euripides, Medea 1021-80 and Seneca, Medea 893-977.” In Homo Viator: Classical Essays for John Bramble, edited by Michael Whitby, Philip R. Hardie, and Mary Whitby. Bristol. 25–37.

Graver, M. 2007. Stoicism and Emotion. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Guastella, G. 2001. “Virgo, Coniunx, Mater: The Wrath of Seneca’s Medea.” Classical Antiquity 20 (2).197–220.

Henry, D. and Walker, B. 1967. “Loss of Identity: Medea Superest?. A Study of Seneca’s Medea.” Classical Philology 62 (3).169–81.

Kaufman, D. H. 2014. “Seneca on the Analysis and Therapy of Occurrent Emotions.” In Seneca Philosophus, edited by Jula Wildberger and Marcia L. Colish. Berlin. 111–33.

Liebermann, W-L. 2014. “Medea.” In Brill’s Companion to Seneca. Philosopher and Dramatist, edited by Gregor Damschen and Andreas Heil. Leiden: Brill. 459–74.

Marti, B. M. 1945. “Seneca’s Tragedies. A New Interpretation.” Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 76.216–45.

Monteleone, Maria. 2014. “De Ira.” In Brill’s Companion to Seneca. Philosopher and Dramatist, edited by Gregor Damschen and Andreas Heil. Leiden. 127–34.

Nussbaum, M. 1996. The Therapy of Desire. Theory and Praxis in Hellenistic Ethics. New Jersey.

Pratt, N. T. 1948. “The Stoic Base of Senecan Drama.” Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 79.1–11.

Schiesaro, A. 1997. “Passion, Reason and Knowledge in Seneca’s Tragedies.” In The Passions in Roman Thought and Literature, edited by Susanna Morton Braund and Christopher Gill. Cambridge.

Schiesaro, A. 2003. The Passions in Play. Thyestes and the Dynamics of Senecan Drama. Cambridge.

Seneca. 2010a. Tragediae] Six Tragedies. Translated by Emily Wilson. Oxford.

Seneca. 2010b. Anger, Mercy, Revenge. Translated by Robert A. Kaster and Martha Craven Nussbaum. The Complete Works of Lucius Annaeus Seneca. Chicago.

Sorabji, R. 2000. Emotion and Peace Of Mind. From Stoic Agitation to Christian Temptation. The Gifford Lectures. Cambridge.

Staley, G. A. 2010. Seneca and the Idea of Tragedy. Oxford.

Tietze, Victoria. 2007. “The Psychology of Uncertainty in Senecan Tragedy.” Illinois Classical Studies 12 (1).135–41.

Vogt, K. M. 2006. “Anger, Present Injustice and Future Revenge in Seneca’s De Ira.” In Seeing Seneca Whole. Perspectives on Philosophy, Poetry and Politics, edited by Katharina Volk and Gareth D. Williams. Leiden. 127–34.




How to Cite

Braicovich, R. S. (2017). Seneca’s Medea and De ira: justice and revenge. Journal of Ancient Philosophy, 11(2), 106-119.