Methodological and Metaphilosophical Lessons in Plato’s Ion
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1981-9471.v11i1p1-19Keywords:
Plato, Ion, method, meraphilosophy, elenchusAbstract
From a detailed overview of Socrates’ exchange with Ion, light is shed on why Socrates’ method of elenchus requires explicit accounts of concepts at issue. Moreover, Ion’s character is shown to provide an object lesson in the tempting vice of intellectual sycophancy.Downloads
References
- Aikin, Scott (Forthcoming) “Ciceronian Academic Skepticism, Augustinian Anti-Skepticism, and the Argument from Second Place.” Ancient Philosophy.
- Aikin, Scott (2016) “So What if Horses Would Draw Horse Gods?” Sophia. 55. 163-177. DOI: 10.1007/s11841-015-0476-y
- Aikin, Scott (2015) “Citizen Skeptic: Cicero’s Academic Republicanism.” Symposion. 2. 275-285. DOI: 10.5840/symposion20152318
- Bloom, Allan (1970) “An Interpretation of Plato’s Ion.” Interpretation. 1. 43-62.
- Altman, William H. F. (2013) The German Stranger: Leo Strauss and National Socialism. Lexington Books, Lanham, MD.
- Benson, H. (2011) “Socratic Method.” In The Cambridge Companion to Plato. Ed. D.R. Morrison. Cambridge University Press, New York. 179-200. DOI: 10.1017/CCOL9780521833424.008
- Bernstein, Jeffrey (2013) “Reply to Altman.” Interpretation. 39. 307-11.
- Dorter, K. (1973) “The Ion: Plato’s Characterization of Art.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. 32. 65-78. DOI: 10.2307/428704
- Elias, Julius (1984) Plato’s Defence of Poetry. State University of New York Press, Albany, NY.
- Futter, Dylan (2013) “Socrates’ Elenctic Goals in Plato’s Early Dialogues.” Ancient Philosophy. 33. 53-73. DOI: 10.5840/ancientphil20133314
- Futter, Dylan (2016) “Commentary, Authority, and the Care for the Self.” Philosophy and Rhetoric. 49. 98-116.
- Ghibellini, Alberto (2013) “Leo Strauss, Gershom Scholem, and the Reason-Revelation Problem.” Interpretation. 40. 57-78.
- Horkheimer, Max and Adorno, Theodor W. (2002) Dialectic of Enlightenment. Trans. Edmund Jephcott. Stanford University Press, Palo Alto.
- Janaway, Christopher (1992) “Craft and Fineness in Plato’s Ion.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy. 10. 1-23.
- LaDrière, Craig (1951) “The Problem of Plato’s Ion.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. DOI: 10.2307/426785
- Murray, Penelope (1997) Plato on Poetry. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
- Roochnik, David (1987) “Plato’s Critique of Postmodernism.” Philosophy and Literature. 11. 282-91. DOI: 10.1353/phl.1987.0043
- Schaper, Eva (1968) Prelude to Aesthetics. Allen and Unwin, London.
- Shelley, Percy Byssche (2009) “A Defence of Poetry.” In The Major Works of Percy Byssche Shelley. Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-00484-3_6
- Stern-Gillett, Suzanne (2004) “On (Mis-)Interpreting Plato’s Ion.” Phronesis. 49. 169-201. DOI: 10.1163/1568528041475176
- Strauss, Leo (2006) “Reason and Revelation,” in Heinrich Meier, Leo Strauss and the Theologico-Political Problem. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139177948.010
- Trivigno, Franco (2012) “Technē, Interpretation, and Comedy in Plato’s Ion.” Apeiron. 45. 283-313. DOI: 10.1515/apeiron-2012-0006
- Urquhart, Troy (2003) “Metaphor, Transfer and Translation in Plato’s Ion: The Postmodern Platonism of Percy Bysshe Shelley’s ‘A Defence of Poetry’.” Romanticism. 31. 1-11. DOI: 10.7202/008700ar
- Vlastos, G. (1994) “The Socratic Elenchus: The Method is All.” In Socratic Studies. Eds. G. Vlastos and M. Burnyeat. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511518515.002
- Vogt, Katja (2012) Belief and Truth: A Skeptic Reading of Plato. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199916818.001.0001
- Warne, Christopher (2013) Arguing with Socrates. Bloomsbury, London.
- Weinstein, Joshua (2014) “Philosophia and the Love of Wisdom.” Interpretation. 40. 323-40.
- Wolfsdorf, D. (2003) “Socrates’ Pursuit of Definitions.” Phronesis. 48. 271-312. DOI: 10.1163/156852803772456065
- Young, Charles (2006) “The Socratic Elenchus.” In A Companion to Plato. Ed. Hugh H. Benson. Wiley-Blackwell. 55-67. DOI: 10.1002/9780470996256.ch5
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC By 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).