Moral Psychology in Plato’s Gorgias
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1981-9471.v11i1p20-65Keywords:
Gorgias, Plato, moral psychology, Republic, shame, epithumiai, thumosAbstract
This essay intends to argue for the affinity between the Gorgias and the Republic concerning issues of moral psychology. To this end I will divide my argument into two halves. The first half will show how the Calliclean moral psychology outlined at 491e-492a implies the possibility of conflict within the soul, especially regarding the relationship between epithumiai and shame. It will then argue that Socrates recognizes the appetitive element of the soul in his reply to Callicles but does not explore its consequences in any depth. The second half will contend that thumos – in the form of shame – is represented dramatically, and to some extent theoretically by Plato as one source of human motivation independent from reason, and recognized as such by the Calliclean position. My ultimate goal is to show how Plato raises questions in the Gorgias that hint at the theory of the tripartite soul expounded in book IV of the Republic, even though the answers here remain insufficient. The Gorgias therefore invites its readers to reflect critically on so-called Socratic intellectualism pointing to a more complex conception of human motivation that will be developed in the Republic.
Downloads
References
Adam, J. (1902), The Republic of Plato, Cambridge University Press.
Beversluis, J. (2000), Cross-Examining Socrates: a Defense of the Interlocutors in Plato’s Early Dialogues, Cambridge University Press.
Brickhouse, T. C. & Smith (2010), N. D. Socratic Moral Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511776946
Canto, M. (1987), Platon. Gorgias, Paris, GF Flammarion.
Carone, G. R. (2001), “Akrasia in the Republic: Does Plato Change his Mind?”, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 20, 107-48.
Carone, G. R (2004), “Calculating Machines or Leaky Jars? The Moral Psychology of Plato’s Gorgias”, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 26, 55-96.
Cooper, J. (1999), “Socrates and Plato in Plato’s Gorgias”, in John Cooper (ed.), Essays on Ancient Moral Psychology and Ethical Theory, Princeton University Press, 29-74.
Cooper, J. (1999b), “Plato’s Theory of Human Motivation”, in John Cooper (ed.), Essays on Ancient Moral Psychology and Ethical Theory, Princeton University Press,118-137.
Dodds, E.R. (1990), Plato. Gorgias, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Dorion, Louis-André (2012), “Enkrateia and the Partition of the Soul in the Gorgias”, in R. Barney et alli (eds.), Plato and Divided Soul, Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511977831.004
Ferrari, G. R. F. (2008), “The Three-Part Soul”, in G. R. F. Ferrari (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Plato’s Republic, Cambridge University Press, 165-201. DOI: 10.1017/CCOL0521839637.007
Gonzalez, F. J. (1995), “Introduction: A Short History of Platonic Interpretation and the ‘Third Way’”, in F. J. Gonzalez (ed.), The Third Way: New Directions in Platonic Studies, Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc., 1-22.
Irwin, T. (1979), Plato. Gorgias, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Irwin, T. (1995), Plato’s Ethics, Oxford University Press.
Irwin, T. (2007), The Development of Ethics, Volume I, Oxford University Press.
Johnstone, M. A. (2011), “Changing Rulers in the Soul: Psychological Transitions in Republic 8-9”, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 41, 157-158.
Kahn, C. (1983), “Drama and Dialectic in Plato’s Gorgias”, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 1, 75-121.
Kahn, C. (1987), “Plato’s Theory of Desire”, The Review of Metaphysics, 41, n. 1, 77-103.
Kahn, C. (1996), Plato and the Socratic Dialogue, Cambridge University Press.
Konstan, D. (2006), The Emotions of the Ancient Greeks, University of Toronto Press.
Lopes, D. R. N. (2011), Górgias de Platão, São Paulo: Perspectiva.
Lorenz, H. (2006), “The Analysis of the Soul in Plato’s Republic”, in G. Santas (ed.), Blackwell Guide to Plato’s Republic, Oxford University Press, 146-165. DOI: 10.1002/9780470776414.ch8
Ludwig. P. W. (2008), “Eros in the Republic”, in G. R. F. Ferrari (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Plato’s Republic, Cambridge University Press, 202-231. DOI 10.1017/CCOL0521839637.008
McKim, R. (1988), “Shame and Truth in Plato’s Gorgias”, in C. L. Griswold (ed.), Platonic Writings – Platonic Readings, London: Routledge.
Moss, J. (2005), “Shame, Pleasure and the Divided Soul”, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 29, 137-170.
Moss, J. (2008), “Plato’s Division of the Soul”, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 34, 35- 68.
Pieri, S. N. (1991), Platone. Gorgia. Napoli: Loffredo Editore.
Plato (2010), Gorgias, Menexenus, Protagoras, M. Schofield (ed.) and T. Griffith (transl.), Cambridge University Press.
Plato (1997), Complete Works, J. Cooper (ed.), Hackett Publishing Company.
Penner, T., “Socrates and the early dialogues”, in R. Kraut (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Plato. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.DOI: 10.1017/CCOL0521430186.004
Rowe, C. & Schofield, M. (eds.) (2000), The Cambridge Companion to Greek and Roman Political Thought, Cambridge University Press.
Rowe, C. (2007), Plato and Art of Philosophical Writing, Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511482625
Rutherford, R. B. (1995), The Art of Plato, London: Duckworth.
Scott, D. (1999), “Platonic Pessimism and Moral Education”, Oxford Sudies in Ancient Philosophy, 17, 15-36.
Shaw, J. Clerk (2015), Plato’s Anti-hedonism and the Protagoras. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781107110618
Solinas, M. (2005), “Desideri: Fenomenologia Degenerativa e Strategie di Controllo”, in M. Vegetti (ed.), Platone. La Repubblica. Libro VIII-IX, Napoli: Bibliopolis, 471-498.
Tarnopolsky, C. H. (2010), Prudes, Perverts and Tyrants. Plato’s Gorgias and the Politics of Shame, Princeton University Press.
Woodruff, P. (2000), “Socrates and the irrational”, in Nicholas D. Smith & Paul B. Woodruff (eds.), Reason and Religion in Socratic Philosophy. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Woolf, R. (2000), “Callicles and Socrates: Psychic (Dis)harmony in the Gorgias”, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 18, 1-40.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC By 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
