Thrasymachus on Justice, Rulers, and Laws in Republic I
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1981-9471.v14i2p76-98Keywords:
Plato, Thrasymachus, Republic, justiceAbstract
One issue of contention amongst scholars of the Republic is whether Thrasymachus initially espouses a conventionalist account of justice, according to which just actions are merely those which are lawful; required, or at least allowed, by the laws passed by the ruler of the state. A further question is then whether his initial conceptions of rulers and laws are positivist ones, such that to be a ruler or law of a state is simply determined by the state’s constitution (or indeed by the ruler’s ability to enforce obedience). At 340c Thrasymachus effectively rejects such positivism by placing a condition on being a ruler that one should be exercising the art of ruling and on being a law that it should work to the ruler’s interest. Some have maintained that this works to clarify his initial account and so shows that he was never a positivist about rulers and laws. In this paper I argue against such an understanding of Thrasymachus’ argument and explore the problems which beset the position he is, on my reading, forced into by Socrates’ objection to his opening claim that justice is what is in the interest of the stronger and the argument he first gives to support it.
Downloads
References
Annas, J. (1981) An Introduction to Plato’s Republic, Oxford.
Austin, J. (1995) The Province of Jurisprudence Determined, ed. W.E. Rumble, Cambridge.
Everson, S. (1998) ‘The Incoherence of Thrasymachus’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy XVI: 99–131.
Everson, S. (2012) ‘Justice and Just Actions in the Republic’, in Morison, B. and Ierodiakonou, K (edd.), Episteme, etc., Oxford: 249–76.
Everson, S. (manuscript) ‘Defining Justice in Republic I’.
Marmor, A. (2011) Philosophy of Law, Princeton and Oxford.
Nawar, T. (2018) ‘Thrasymachus’ Unerring Skill and the Arguments of Republic 1’, Phronesis 63: 359–91.
Reeve, C. D. C. (1998) Philosopher-Kings, Princeton/Oxford.
Reeve, C. D. C. (2008) ‘Glaucon’s Challenge and Thrasymacheanism’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy XXXIV: 69–103.
Wiggins, D. (2001) Sameness and Substance Renewed, Cambridge.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC By 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).