Sobre a tese de que a bivalência implica o determinismo causal, do estoicismo ao aristotelismo

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1981-9471.v15i1p173-189

Keywords:

De interpretatione, Bivalência, Batalha naval, Estoicismo

Abstract

According to Simplicius’ commentary on Aristotle’s Categories, the Platonic philosopher Claudius Nicostratus (fl. mid-2nd c. A.D.) challenges Aristotle’s claim in the Categories to the effect that statements about future contingents are neither true nor false. I argue that Nicostratus’ charge traces back to Chrysippus’ argument for causal determinism in Cicero’s De Fato and plays a significant role in motivating Ammonius’ and Boethius’ solution to the problem of future contingents.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Paulo Ferreira, Universidade Federal de São Paulo

Professor Adjunto.

References

Ackrill, J. L. Aristotle: Categories and De Interpretatione. Clarendon, 1963.

Allen, T. W. Homeri opera. Vols. III-IV. 2a ed. Clarendon, 1917.

Barbosa Filho, B. “Aristóteles e o princípio de bivalência” Analytica 9 (2005): 173-84.

Barnes, J. Truth, Etc. Oxford, 2007.

Blank, D. & Kretzmann, N. (eds.) Ammonius’ On Aristotle’s On Interpretation 9 with Boethius’ On Aristotle’s On Interpretation 9 (First and Second Commentaries). Cornell, 1998.

Bobzien, S. Determinism and Freedom in Stoic Philosophy. Oxford, 1998.

Bodéüs, R. Aristote: Catégories. Belles-Lettres, 2001.

Busse, A. Ammonii in Aristotelis De Interpretatione commentarius. G. Reimer, 1897.

Charles, D. & Peramatzis, M. “Aristotle on Truth-Bearers” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 50 (2016): 101-41.

Craig, W. L. The Problem of Divine Foreknowledge and Future Contingents from Aristotle to Suárez. Brill, 1988.

Crivelli, P. Aristotle on Truth. Cambridge, 2004.

Diels, H. Simplicii in Aristotelis Physicorum libros quattuor posteriores commentaria. G. Reimer, 1895.

Dillon, J. The Middle Platonists: 80 BC to AD 220. 2a ed. Cornell, 1996.

Dorandi, T. Diogenes Laertius: Lives of Eminent Philosophers. Cambridge, 2013.

Dummett, M. Truth and Other Enigmas. Harvard, 1978.

Dummett, M. Truth and the Past. Columbia, 2004.

Ferreira, P. “Notas sobre a definição do enunciado asseverativo (λόγος ἀποφαντικός) em Aristóteles” Journal of Ancient Philosophy 5 (2011): 1-14.

Giomini, R. M. Tulli Ciceronis De Divinatione, De Fato, Timaeus. Teubner, 1975.

Griffin, M. Aristotle’s Categories in the Early Roman Empire. Oxford, 2015.

Haack, S. Philosophy of Logics. Cambridge, 1978.

Hertz, M. J. & Hosius, C. A. Gellii Noctium Atticarum libri XX. 2 vols. Teubner, 1903.

Hicks, R. D. Diogenes Laertius: Lives of Eminent Philosophers. 2 vols. Harvard, 1925.

Hude, K. Herodoti Historiae. 2 vols. 3a ed. Clarendon, 1927.

Kalbfleisch, K. Simplicii in Aristotelis Categorias commentarium. G. Reimer, 1907.

Kretzmann, N. “Boethius and the Truth about Tomorrow’s Sea Battle” in: BLANK & KRETZMANN (eds.) (1998), pp. 24-52.

MacFarlane, J. “Future Contingents and Relative Truth” Philosophical Quarterly 53 (2003): 321-36.

Mates, B. Stoic Logic. 2a ed. California, 1961.

Meiser, K. Anicii Manlii Severini Boethii commentarii in librum Aristotelis περὶ ἑρμηνείας. 2 vols. Teubner, 1877-80.

Mignucci, M. “Ammonius and the Problem of Future Contingent Truth” in: SEEL (ed.) (2001), pp. 247-84 [versão revista de MIGNUCCI (1998)].

Mignucci, M. “Ammonius on Future Contingent Propositions” in: Frede, M. & Striker, G. (eds.) Rationality in Greek Thought. Clarendon, 1996, pp. 279-310.

Mignucci, M. “Ammonius’ Sea Battle” in: BLANK & KRETZMANN (eds.) (1998), pp. 53-86 [versão revista de MIGNUCCI (1996)].

Minio-Paluello, L. Aristotelis Categoriae et liber De Interpretatione. Clarendon, 1956.

Monro, D. B. & Allen, T. W. Homeri opera. Vols. I-II. 3a ed. Clarendon, 1920.

Nuchelmans, G. Theories of the Proposition: Ancient and Medieval Conceptions of the Bearers of Truth and Falsity. North Holland, 1973.

Quine, W. v. O. Philosophy of Logic. 2a ed. Harvard, 1986.

Ramus, P. M.T. Ciceronis De Fato liber. 2a ed. Vascosan, 1554.

Santos, R. Aristóteles: Categorias e Da Interpretação. INCM, 2016.

Seel, G. (ed.) Ammonius and the Seabattle. De Gruyter, 2001.

Sharples, R. W. Cicero: On Fate & Boethius: The Consolation of Philosophy IV.5-7, V. Warminster, 1991.

Sorabji, R. (ed.) Aristotle Transformed: The Ancient Commentators and Their Influence. Cornell, 1990.

Sorabji, R. Necessity, Cause, and Blame: Perspectives on Aristotle’s Theory. Cornell, 1980.

Sorabji, R. The Philosophy of the Commentators, 200-600 AD: A Sourcebook. Vol. 3: Logic and Metaphysics. Cornell, 2005.

Wachsmuth, K. & Hense, O. Ioannis Stobaei Anthologium. 5 vols. com apêndice. Weidmann, 1884-1923.

Weidemann, H. Aristoteles: De Interpretatione. De Gruyter, 2014.

West, M. L. Homerus: Ilias. 2 vols. De Gruyter, 2019.

West, M. L. Homerus: Odyssea. De Gruyter, 2017.

Westphal, J. “The Future and Truth-Value Links: A Common Sense View” Analysis 66 (2006): 1-9.

Wilson, N. G. Herodoti Historiae. 2 vols. Clarendon, 2015.

Downloads

Published

2021-05-21

How to Cite

Ferreira, P. . (2021). Sobre a tese de que a bivalência implica o determinismo causal, do estoicismo ao aristotelismo. Journal of Ancient Philosophy, 15(1), 173-189. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1981-9471.v15i1p173-189

Issue

Section

Discussions