A retórica do capítulo IX do tratado Da Interpretação

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1981-9471.v15i1p190-206

Keywords:

De interpretatione, Batalha naval, Retórica

Abstract

This paper analyses the argumentative strategy of the ninth chapter of the treatise De Interpretatione in the light of Aristotle's Rhetoric. The subject of the ‘future events’ developed in chapter IX brings up themes that are proper not only to philosophical thought, but also to political practice, forensic rhetoric, deliberative rhetoric and even tragic poetry. In this paper, it is argued that Aristotle uses the dialectical method and certain rhetorical techniques to touch the various discussions related to the subject addressed. He erects a hypothetical adversary and a thesis to refute, condensing some positions that were probably scattered in the most diverse textual and oratory sources of his time. Moreover, he builds the thesis of his hypothetical opponent from premises established in previous chapters of his own treatise. With this, he can simulate the defense of his opponent's thesis before demolishing it. Thus, according to the hypothesis defended here, the philosopher does not in fact commit himself to the arguments presented between 18a35 and 18b25, but only simulates the defense of the reasoning which he will soon refute. In addition, it is also concluded that chapter IX is part of the argumentative chain of the treatise, having as a peculiar characteristic, not the theme or nature of the arguments exposed, but the rhetorical method it employs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Luisa Buarque, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro

Professora Adjunta.

References

Aristóteles. Categorias, Da Interpretação. Introdução, tradução e notas de Ricardo Santos. Lisboa: Imprensa Nacional Casa da Moeda, 2014.

Aristóteles. Categories and De Interpretatione. Translated with notes by J. L. Ackrill. Oxofrd: Clarendon Press, 2002.

Aristóteles. Catégories, Sur l’interprétation. Introduction générale à l’Organon par Pierre Pellegrin. Présentations et traductions par Michel Crubellier, Catherine Dalimier et Pierre Pellegrin.Paris : Éditions Flammarion, 2007.

Aristóteles. Da Interpretação. Tradução e comentários José Veríssimo Teixeira da Mata. São Paulo: Editora Unesp, 2013.

Aristóteles. Retórica. Tradução de Manuel Alexandre Júnior, Paulo Farmhouse Alberto e Abel do Nascimento Pena, 2005. Lisboa: Imprensa Nacional Casa da Moeda, 2005.

Crivelli, P. Aristotle on Truth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.

Fine, G. «Truth and Necessity in De Interpretatione 9», in History of Philosophy Quarterly, vol. 1, 1984, pp. 23-47.

Frede, D. «The Sea-Battle Reconsidered: A Defence of the Traditional Interpretation», in Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 3, 1985, pp. 31-87.

Hintikka. The once and future sea fight: Aristotle’s discussion of future contingents in De Interpretatione IX., in The Philosophical Review, Vol. 73, No. 4 (Oct., 1964), pp. 461-492.

Iacona, A. Future contingent and Aristotle’s fantasy, in Crítica, Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofia. Vol. 39, nº 117 (diciembre 2007): 45-60.

Jones, R. Truth and Contradiction in Aristotle’s De Interpretatione 6-9, in Phronesis 55 (2010), p. 26-67.

Whitaker, C. W. A. Aristotle’s De Interpretatione. Contradiction and Dialectic. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996.

Downloads

Published

2021-05-21

How to Cite

Buarque, L. (2021). A retórica do capítulo IX do tratado Da Interpretação. Journal of Ancient Philosophy, 15(1), 190-206. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1981-9471.v15i1p190-206

Issue

Section

Discussions