The Place of Human Beings in the Natural Environment - Aristotle’s Philosophy of Biology and the Dominant Anthropocentric Reading of Genesis

Authors

  • Giulia Mingucci University of Bologna

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1981-9471.v15i2p210-225

Keywords:

Anthropocentrism, Christian tradition, Genesis, Aristotle

Abstract

In a seminal essay from 1967, historian Lynn White, Jr., argues that the profound cause of today’s environmental crisis is the anthropocentric perspective, embedded in the Christian “roots” of Western tradition, which assigns an intrinsic value to human beings solely. Though White’s thesis relies on a specific tradition – the so-called “dominant anthropocentric reading” of Genesis – the idea that anthropocentrism provides the ideological basis for the exploitation of nature has proven tenacious, and even today is the ground assumption of the historical and philosophical debate on environmental issues. This paper investigates the possible impact on this debate of a different kind of anthropocentrism: Aristotle’s philosophy of biology. The topic is controversial, since it involves opposing traditions of interpretations; for the purpose of the present paper, the dominant anthropocentric reading of Gen. 1.28 will be analyzed, and the relevant passages from Aristotle’s De Partibus Animalium, showing his commitment to a more sophisticated anthropocentric perspective, will be reviewed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

The Holy Bible, Revised Standard Version (Toronto, New York, Edinburgh: Thomas Nelson & Sons, 1952).

Brennan Andrew and Lo, Yeuk-Sze. “Environmental Ethics”, in Edward N. Zalta, ed., The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2020 Edition). URL = https://plato.stanford.edu/ archives/sum2020/entries/ethics-environmental/.

Calarco, Matthew. “Being Toward Meat: Anthropocentrism, Indistinction, and Veganism”, in Dialectical Anthropology 38 (2014) 4: 415-429.

Callicott, J. Baird. “Genesis Revisited: Murian Musings on the Lynn White, Jr. Debate”, Environmental History Review 14 (1989) 1/2: 65-90 .

Carbone, Andrea. “Anomalies de l’intelligence, intelligence de l’anomalie: Note sur la représentation de l’organisation du corps vivant chez Aristote entre les Parva Naturalia et les Problèmes”, in C. Grellard and P.-M. Morel, ed., Les Parva Naturalia d’Aristote: Fortune antique et médiévale (Paris: Publications de la Sorbonne, 2010): 11-30.

Cerami Cristina and Falcon, Andrea. “Continuity and Discontinuity in the Greek and Arabic Reception of Aristotle’s Study of Animals”, Antiquorum Philosophia, 8 (2014): 35-56.

Chemhuru, Munamato. “Elements of Environmental Ethics in Ancient Greek Philosophy”, Phronimon 18 (2017): 15-30.

Cohen, Jeremy. “Be Fertile and Increase, Fill the Earth and Master It”: The Ancient and Medieval Career of a Biblical Text (Ithaca, N.Y., and London: Cornell University Press, 1989).

Crist, Eileen and Kopnina, Helen. “Unsettling Anthropocentrism”, in Dialectical Anthropology 38 (2014) 4: 387-396.

Ducharme, Alain. “Aristotle and the Dominion of Nature”, Environmental Ethics 36 (2014) 2: 203-214.

Eugene C. Hargrove, “Weak Anthropocentric Intrinsic Value”, The Monist 75 (1992) 2: 183-207.

Falcon, Andrea. Aristotelismo (Torino: Einaudi, 2017).

Falcon, Andrea. Aristotle and the Science of Nature (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).

Glazebrook, Trish. “Art or Nature: Aristotle, Restoration Ecology, and Flowforms”, Ethics and the Environment 8 (2003) 1: 22-36.

Gregoric, Pavel. “Plato’s and Aristotle’s Explanation of Human Posture”, in Rizhai 2 (2005) 2: 183-196.

Grey, William. “Environmental Value and Anthropocentrism”, Ethics and the Environment 3 (1998) 1: 97-103.

Harrison, Peter. “Subduing the Earth: Genesis 1, Early Modern Science, and the Exploitation of Nature”, The Journal of Religion 79 (1999) 1: 86-109.

Hett, W.S. Aristotle: On the Soul, Parva Naturalia, On Breath (Cambridge, Mass., London: LOEB, 1957).

Jobling, David. ‘And Have Dominion…’, Dissertation (New York: Union Theological Seminary, 1972).

Jobling, David. “‘And Have Dominion…’: The Interpretation of Genesis 1,28 in Philo Judaeus”, Journal for the Study of Judaism in the Persian, Hellenistic, and Roman Period 8 (1977) 1: 50-82.

Johansen, Thomas. “From Craft to Nature: The Emergence of Natural Teleology”, in L. Taub, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Greek and Roman Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020): 102-120.

Jowett, Benjamin. ed., The Politics of Aristotle (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1885).

Judson, Lindsay. “Aristotelian Teleology”. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 29 (2005): 341-366.

Keller, David. ed., Environmental Ethics: The Big Questions (Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley, 2010).

Kullmann, Wolfang. “Different Concepts of the Final Cause in Aristotle”, in Alan Gotthelf, ed., Aristotle on Nature and Living Things (Pittsburgh: Mathesis Publications, 1985): 170-175.

Kullmann, Wolfgang. Aristoteles und die Moderne Wissenschaft (Stuttgart 1998).

Le Blond, J.M. ed., Aristote philosophe de la vie: Le livre premier du traité sur les Parties des Animaux (Paris: Aubier Éditions Montaigne, 1945).

Lennox, James. “The Disappearance of Aristotle’s Biology: A Hellenistic Mystery”, Apeiron 27 (1994): 7-24.

Lennox, James. “The Place of Zoology in Aristotle’s Natural Philosophy”, in Robert W. Sharples, ed., Philosophy and the Sciences in Antiquity (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2005): 58-70.

Lennox, James. ed., Aristotle: On the Parts of Animals I-IV (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001).

Lloyd, G.E.R. Science, Folklore and Ideology: Studies in the Life Sciences in Ancient Greece (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983).

Louis, J. ed., Aristote: Les parties des animaux (Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1956).

Mingucci, Giulia. “Una difesa dello studio della materia vivente: Aristotele, De Partibus Animalium I 5”, Antiquorum Philosophia 14 (2020), pp. 159-175.

Nash, Roderick. The Rights of Nature (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1988).

Nussbaum, Martha, ed., Aristotle’s De Motu Animalium (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1978).

Perfetti, Stefano. Aristotle’s Zoology and Its Renaissance Commentators (1521-1601) (Leuven: Leuven University Press, 2000).

Ross, W.D. ed., Aristotle: Parva naturalia (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1955).

Ross, W.D. ed., Aristotelis Politica (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1957).

Sedley, David. “Is Aristotle’s Teleology Anthropocentric?”, Phronesis 36 (1991) 2: 179-196.

Simkins, Ronald. “The Bible and Anthropocentrism: Putting Humans in Their Place”, Dialectical Anthropology 38 (2014) 4: 397-413.

Susanne Foster, “Aristotle and the Environment”, Environmental Ethics 24 (2002) 4: 409-428.

Wardy, Robert. “Aristotle Rainfall or the Lore of Averages”, Phronesis 38 (1993): 18-33.

White, Lynn. “The Historical Roots of our Ecological Crisis”, Science 155 (1967): 1203-1207.

Downloads

Published

2021-10-14

How to Cite

Mingucci, G. (2021). The Place of Human Beings in the Natural Environment - Aristotle’s Philosophy of Biology and the Dominant Anthropocentric Reading of Genesis. Journal of Ancient Philosophy, 15(2), 210-225. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1981-9471.v15i2p210-225

Issue

Section

Discussions