Argumentos y Explicaciones en De Caelo 2

Authors

  • Fabián Mié Universidad Nacional del Litoral
  • Manuel Berrón Universidad Nacional del Litoral

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1981-9471.v16i1p51-87

Keywords:

Damascius, Neoplatonism, Forms, Elements

Abstract

The main concern of this paper is the problem of method in De Caelo (Book 2 and some related treatises), which has been recently invigorated by the supposition of Aristotle’s acceptance of two standards of justification. Whereas the φυσικῶς argument comes close to demonstrative knowledge, the εὐλόγως argument relies on more general assumptions and allegedly points towards argumentative justification (sometimes associated with dialectic). With a view to better understanding how empirical criteria for theories, teleological principles, and the resolution of difficulties are laid down to provide as much causal explanations  as possible, we take side here in the debate about the very purpose of Aristotle’s using of justification by argument in scientific contexts. Our main claim is that although only reasonable proofs can be  worked out in empirically underdetermined domains, this in no way amounts to endorsing an alternative to the norms of inquiry Aristotle upholds in natural science.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Textos

Los textos de Aristóteles se citan según el Thesaurus Linguae Graecae Canon of Greek Authors and Works (TLG), 3ra. ed., 1990, Oxford (ed. impresa).

Los textos de Platón se citan según Platonis Opera, 5 vols., J. Burnet (ed.), Oxford (Oxford Classical Texts), 1900-22.

Ediciones especiales

Brunschwig, Jacques. Aristote, Topiques, Tome I, Livres I-IV. Texte Établi et Traduit, Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1967.

Brunschwig, Jacques. Aristote, Topiques, Tome II, Livres V-VIII. Texte Établi et Traduit, Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 2007.

Lee, H. D. P. Aristotle, Meteorologica. With an English Translation, Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press, 1952 (The Loeb Classical Library).

Longo, Oddone. Aristotele, De Caelo. Introduzione, Testo Critico, Traduzione e Note, Firenze: Sansoni, 1961.

Louis, Pierre. Aristote, De la Génération des Animaux, Text Établi et Traduit, Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1961.

Louis, Pierre. Aristote, Les Parties des Animaux, Text Établi et Traduit, Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1957.

Louis, Pierre. Histoire des Animaux (Historia Animalium), 3 tomes. Texte établi et Traduit, Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1964.

Joachim, Harold H. Aristotle, On Coming-To-Be and Passing-Away (De Generatione et Corruptione), A Revised Text with Introduction and Commentary, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1926.

Moraux, Paul. Aristote, Du Ciel. Text Établi et Traduit, Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1965.

Mugnier, René. Petits Traités d’Histoire Naturelle (Parva naturalia). Texte Établi et Traduit. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1965.

Ross, W. D. Aristotle’s Prior and Posterior Analytics. A Revised Text with Introduction and Commentary, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1949.

Ross, W. D. Aristotle’s De Anima. Recensuit brevique adnotatione critica instruxit, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1956.

Ross, W. D. Aristotle’s Metaphysics. A revised text with introduction and commentary, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1924.

Ross, W. D. Aristotle’s Physics. A Revised Text with Introduction and Commentary, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1936.

Ross, W. D. Aristotle’s Topica et Sophistici Elenchi. Recensuit brevique adnotatione critica instruxit, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1958.

Walzer, R. R. et Mingay, J. M. Ethica Eudemia. Recognoverunt brevique adnotatione critica instruxerunt, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.

Bibliografía

Barnes, Jonathan. “Aristotle and the Method of Ethics”, Revue Internationale de Philosophie 34 (1980): 490-511.

Berti Enrico. “L’uso ‘scientifico’ della dialettica in Aristotele” (1995), reed. en Nuovi Studi Aristotelici I. Brescia: Morcelliana, 2004, 265-282.

Berrón, Manuel. Ciencia y dialéctica en Acerca del cielo de Aristóteles, Santa Fe: Ediciones UNL, 2016.

Bodnár, István. “Movers and Elemental Motion in Aristotle”, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 15 (1997): 81-117.

Bolton, Robert. “Aristotle’s Method in Natural Science”, en L. Judson (ed.), Aristotle’s Physics. A Collection of Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991, 1-29.

Bolton, Robert. “The Epistemological Basis of Aristotelian Dialectic”, en May Sim (ed.), From Puzzles to Principles? Essays on Aristotle’s Dialectic, Lanham (Maryland): Lexington Books, 1999, 57-105.

Bolton Robert. “Two Standards for Inquiry in Aristotle’s De Caelo”, en A. Bowen and C. Wildberg (eds.), New Perspectives on Aristotle’s De Caelo, Leiden/Boston: Brill, 2009, 51-82.

Bonitz, Hermann. Index Aristotelicus, Graz: Akademische Druck- und Verlagsanstalt, 19552.

Bourgey, Louis. Observation et Expérience chez Aristote, Paris: Vrin, 1955.

Brunschwig, Jacques. “Dialectique et Philosophie chez Aristote, à nouveau”, en N. L. Cordero (ed.), Ontologie et Dialogue. Mélanges en Hommage à Pierre Aubenque, Paris: Vrin, 2000, 108-133.

Buchheim, Thomas. Aristoteles, Über Werden und Vergehen. Übersetzt und erläutert, Berlin, Akademie, 2010.

Burnyeat, Myles. A Map of Metaphysics Zeta, Pittsburgh: Mathesis, 2001.

Candel, Miguel. Aristóteles, Acerca del cielo. Meteorológicos, Introducción, traducción y notas, Madrid: Gredos, 1996.

Botteri, Gerardo y Casazza, Roberto. El sistema astronómico de Aristóteles. Una interpretación, Buenos Aires: Biblioteca Nacional, 2015.

Detel, Wolfgang. Aristoteles, Analytica Posteriora. Übersetzt und erläutert. 2 volúmenes, Berlin: Akademie, 1993.

Falcon, Andrea and Leunissen, Mariska. “The scientific role of eulogos in Aristotle’s Cael. II 12”, en David Ebrey (ed.), Theory and Practice in Aristotle’s Natural Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015, 217-240.

Frede, Dorothea. “The Endoxon Mystique: What Endoxa are and What They are Not”, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 43 (2012): 185-215.

Gotthelf, Allan. “First Principles in Aristotle’s Parts of Animals”, en A. Gotthelf and J. Lennox (eds.), Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987, 167-198.

Irwin, Terence. Aristotle’s First Principles, Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1988.

Jori, Alberto. Aristoteles, Über den Himmel. Übersetzt und erläutert, Berlin: Akademie, 2009.

Karbowski, Joseph. “Empirical eulogos Argumentation in GA III 10”, British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22/1 (2014): 25-38.

Karbowski, Joseph. “Justification ‘by Argument’ in Aristotle’s Natural Science”, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 51 (2016): 117-158.

Kullmann, Wolfgang. “Zur wissenschaftlichen Methode des Aristoteles”, en H. Flashar und K. Gaiser (eds.), Synusia (Festgabe für W. Schadewaldt), Pfullingen: Neske, 1965, 247-274.

Kullmann, Wolfgang. Wissenschaft und Methode. Interpretationen zur Aristotelischen Theorie der Naturwissenschaft, Berlin: De Gruyter, 1974.

Lear, Jonathan. Aristotle and Logical Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980.

Le Blond, Jean-Marie. Logique et Méthode chez Aristote. Étude sur la Recherche des Principes dans la Physique Aristotélicienne, Paris: Vrin, 19702.

Leunissen, Mariska. “Why Stars Have No Feet: Explanation and Teleology in Aristotle’s Cosmology”, en A. Bowen and C. Wildberg (eds.), New Perspectives on Aristotle’s De Caelo, Leiden/Boston: Brill, 2009, 215-237.

Leunissen, Mariska. Explanation and Teleology in Aristotle’s Science of Nature, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010

Leunissen, Mariska. “Surrogate Principles and the Natural Order of Exposition in Aristotle’s De Caelo II”, en W. Wians and R. Polansky (eds.), Reading Aristotle: Argument and Exposition, Leiden/Boston: Brill, 2017, 165-180.

Lloyd, G. E. R. Magic, Reason, and Experience. Studies in the Origins and Development of Greek Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.

Mansion, Augustin. Introduction à la Physique Aristotélicienne, Louvain-La-Neuve: Éditions de l’Institute Supérieure de Philosophie, 19722.

Martins Mendonça, Fernando. “A utilidade dos Tópicos em relaçao aos princípios das ciências”, en Lucas Angioni (ed.), Lógica e Ciência em Aristóteles, Campinas: Phi, 2014, 287-329.

Matthen, Mohan. “Why Does the Earth Move to the Center? An Examination of Some Explanatory Strategies in Aristotle’s Cosmology”, en A. Bowen and C. Wildberg (eds.), New Perspectives on Aristotle’s De Caelo, Leiden/Boston: Brill, 2009, 119-138.

McKirahan, Richard D. Principles and Proofs: Aristotle’s Theory of Demonstrative Science, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1992.

Owen, G. E. L. “Τιθὴναι τὰ φαινόμενα”, en Suzanne Mansion (ed.), Aristote et les Problèmes de Méthode, Paris: Éditions de l’Institut Superieure de Philosophie, 19802, 83-103.

Primavesi, Oliver. Die Aristotelische Topik. Ein Interpretationsmodell und seine Erprobung am Beispiel von Topik B. München: Beck, 1996.

Rapp, Christof. “Aristotle and the Cosmic Game of Dice”, Rhizomata 2/2 (2014): 161-186.

Rossi, Gabriela. “Going through aporiai: the critical use of Aristotle’s dialectic”, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 52 (2017): 209-56.

Simplicio. In Aristotelis de Caelo, Edidit I. L. Heiberg, Berlin: Reimer, 1984 (CAG VII).

Smith, Robin. Aristotle, Prior Analytics. Translated, with introduction, notes, and commentary, Indianapolis: Hackett, 1989.

Smith, Robin. Aristotle, Topics. Books I and VIII with Excerpts from Related Texts. Translated with a Commentary, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997.

Smith, Robin. “Dialectic and Method in Aristotle”, en May Sim (ed.), From Puzzles to Principles? Essays on Aristotle’s Dialectic, Lanham (Maryland): Lexington Books, 1999, 39-55.

Solmsen, Friedrich. Die Entwicklung der Aristotelischen Logik und Rhetorik, Berlin: Weidmannsche Buchhandlung, 1929.

Solmsen, Friedrich. Aristotle’s System of the Physical World. A Comparison with His Precedessors, Ithaca (N.Y.): Cornell University Press, 1960

Zingano, Marco. “Ways of Proving in Aristotle”, en W. Wians, and R. Polansky (eds.), Reading Aristotle: Argument and Exposition, Leiden/Boston: Brill, 2017, 7-49.

Downloads

Published

2022-04-21

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Mié, F. ., & Berrón, M. (2022). Argumentos y Explicaciones en De Caelo 2. Journal of Ancient Philosophy, 16(1), 51-87. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1981-9471.v16i1p51-87