El Comentario de Miguel de Éfeso a PA A1 en el Origen Griego de la Rama Biológica de la Tradición Aristotélica

Authors

  • Eduardo H. Mombello Universidad Nacional del Comahue

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1981-9471.v16i2p195-252

Keywords:

Miguel de Éfeso, biologia, De partibus animalium, Aristóteles

Abstract

In De partibus animalium A1, Aristotle presents —in a darker than usual way— decisive details of the methodology he devised for his science of nature. His indications seem to point the path along which Aristotelian biology should travel. However, numerous textual and systematic difficulties have given rise to a number of conflicting interpretations, in the context of a vigorous stream of philosophical research and debate since the last third of the last century. In this stream of studies, Michael of Ephesus’s commentary on PA and his views on the subject remain relatively ignored. A complex multiplicity of factors seems to support the lack of sufficient consensus among leading contemporary specialists to explicitly consider those contributions. The purpose of this paper is to examine several of these factors and, based on the evidence provided by little explored aspects of Michael’s texts, to offer arguments in favor of that consensus against a number of alternatives. I shall argue that the contributions of this late commentator deserve to be considered —mutatis mutandis— as seriously as it is done with the main ancient Greek commentaries; in particular, in the philosophical studies of those who are currently interested in that methodology or are engaged in Aristotelian biology.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adler, A. (1928-35) Suidae lexicon, 4 vols., Leipzig.

Angioni, L. (2017) “O ser humano cultivado (pepaideumenos) em Aristóteles” en Filosofia e Educação 9.1, 165-196.

Arabatzis, G. (2006) Παιδεία και Επιστήμη στον Μιχαήλ Εφέσιο εις ‘Περί ζώων μορίων I 1.3-2.10’, Atenas.

Arabatzis, G. (2009) “Michael of Ephesus on the Empirical Man, the Scientist and the Educated Man (In Ethica Nicomachea X and In de Partibus Animalium I)” en Barber, C. y Jenkins, D. (eds.) (2009), 163-184.

Arabatzis, G. (2012a) “Michel d’Ephèse, commentateur d’Aristote et auteur” en Peitho Examina Antiqua 1 (3), 199-209.

Arabatzis, G. (2012b) “Michael of Ephesus and the philosophy of living things (In De partibus animalium, 22.25–23.9)” en B. Bydén y K. Ierodiakonou (eds.), 51-78.

Arabatzis, G. (2015) “Daniel Furlanus on Michael of Ephesus and the Pleasure of Biological Knowledge” en Quaestio 15, 211-219.

Aubenque, P. (1974) El problema del ser en Aristóteles, Madrid.

Balme, D. M. (1992) Aristotle De Partibus Animalium I and De Generatione Animalium I (with Passages from II.1-3), with a Report on Recent Work and an Additional Bibliography by Allan Gotthelf, Oxford.

Barber, C. y Jenkins, D. (eds.) (2009) Medieval Greek Commentaries on the Nicomachean Ethics, Leiden.

Barker, E. (1957) Social and Political Thought in Byzantium, Oxford.

Barnes, J. (1993) Aristotle Posterior Analytics, Translated with a Commentary, Oxford (reimp. 2002).

Benakis, L. G. (2009) “Aristotelian Ethics in Byzantium” en C. Barber y D. Jenkins (eds.) (2009), 63-69.

Berti, E. (2017) Tradurre la Metafisica di Aristotele, Brescia.

Boeri, M. (2007) “¿Es el objeto de la ἐπιστήμη aristotélica sólo lo necesario? Reflexiones sobre el valor de lo ὡς ἐπὶ τὸ πολὺ en el modelo aristotélico de ciencia” en Méthexis XX, 29-49.

Bolton, R. (2010) “Biology and metaphysics in Aristotle” en Lennox, J. G. y Bolton, R. (eds.) Being, Nature, and Life in Aristotle. Essays in Honor of Allan Gotthelf, Cambridge (UK), 30-55.

Bonelli, M. (2015) “Alessandro di Afrodisia esegeta di Aristotele: una buona esegesi?” en E. Cattanei, F. Fronterotta y S. Maso (eds.) Studi su Aristotele e l’aristotelismo, Roma, 93-107.

Browning, R. (1962) “An Unpublished Funeral Oration on Anna Comnena” en Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society, 1-12.

Bruns, I. (1887) Alexandri Aphrodisiensis praeter commentaria scripta minora. Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca, Suppl. 2.1, Berlín.

Busse, A. (1895) Ammonius in Aristotelis categorias commentarius. Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca 4.4, Berlín.

Busse, A. (1897) Ammonius in Aristotelis de interpretatione commentarius. Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca 4.5, Berlín.

Bydén, B. y Ierodiakonou, K. (eds.) (2012) The Many Faces of Byzantine Philosophy, Atenas.

Cohen, M. y Matthews, G. (1991) Ammonius On Aristotles Categories, London

Darrouzès, J. (1970) Georges et Dèmètrios Tornikès: Lettres et discours. Introduction, texte, analyses, traduction et notes, París.

Detel, W. (2004) “A New Reading of Aristotle’s Philosophy of Science” en Lutz-Bachmann, M., Fidora, A. y Antolic, P. (eds) Erkenntnis und Wissenschaft. Probleme der Epistemologie in der Philosophie des Mittelalters, Berlín, 1-14.

Detel, W. (2006) “Aristotle’s Logic and Theory of Science” en Gill, M. L. y Pellegrin, P. (eds) A Companion to Ancient Philosophy, Malden - Oxford – Melbourne, 245-269.

Detel, W. (2014) “Semantic Normativity and the Foundation of Ancient Ethics” en Hardy, J. y Rudebusch, G. (eds.) Ancient Ethics, Göttingen, 425-465.

Diels, H. (1895) Simplicii in Aristotelis physicorum libros octo commentaria, 2 vols, Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca 9 & 10, Berlín.

Donini, P. (1994) “Testi e commenti, manuali e insegnamento: la forma sistematica e i metodi della filosofia in età postellenistica” en M. Bonazzi (ed.) (2011) Pierluigi Donini. Commentary and Tradition, Berlín – N.Y., 211-281.

Donini, P. (1995) “Alessandro di Afrodisia e i metodi dell’esegesi filosofica” en M. Bonazzi (ed.) (2011) Pierluigi Donini. Commentary and Tradition, Berlín – N.Y., 87-106.

Düring, I. (1943) Aristotle’s De Partibus Animalium: Critical and Literary Commentaries, Gotemburgo (reimp. 1980, New York – London).

Düring, I. (1961) “Aristotle’s method in biology” en S. Mansion (ed.) (1961) Aristote et les problèmes de méthode: Communications présentées au Symposium Aristotelicum tenu à Louvain du 24 août au 1er septembre 1960, Luvain, 213-221.

Düring, I. (2000) Aristóteles. Exposición e interpretación y de su pensamiento, México

Falcon, A. (2005) Aristotle and the Science of Nature. Unity without Uniformity, Cambridge.

Falcon, A. (2017) Aristotelismo, Torino.

Falcon, A. (2021a) “The Reception of the De incessu animalium” en Falcon- Stavrianeas (eds.) (2021b), 19-31.

Falcon, A. y Stavrianeas, S. (2021b) (eds.) Aristotle on How Animals Move. The De incessu animalium: Text, Translation, and Interpretative Essay, Cambridge.

Falcon, A. (2021c) “Commentators on Aristotle” en The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2021 Ed.), E. N. Zalta (ed.), recup. de https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/ win2021/entries/aristotle-commentators.

Fazzo, S. (2004) “Aristotelianism as a Commentary Tradition” en Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies vol. 47 (iss. supl. 83 part. 1), 1-19.

Fazzo, S. (2008) “L’exégèse du livre Lambda de la Métaphysique d’Aristote dans le De principiis et dans la Quaestio I.1 d’Alexandre d’Aphrodise” en Laval théologique et philosophique, vol. 64, n° 3, 2008, p. 607-626.

Fazzo, S. (2014) “Editing Aristotle's Metaphysics: why should Harlfinger's stemma be verified?” en Journal of Ancient Philosophy, vol. 8.2, 133-159.

Fazzo, S. (2016) “Aristotle’s Metaphysics. Current Research to Reconcile Two Branches of the Tradition” en Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, vol. 98.4, 433–457.

Fazzo, S. (2017) “Lo stemma codicum della Metafisica di Aristotele” en Revue d’Histoire des Textes, v. 12, 35-58.

Fotinis, A. P. (1978) The De Anima of Alexander of Aphrodisias: a Translation and Commentary, Milwaukee.

Frede, D. (2017) “Alexander of Aphrodisias” en E.N. Zalta (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, recup. de https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/alexander -afrodisias

Fryde, E. (2000) The Early Paleologan Renaissance (1261-c.1360), London - Boston - Köln

García-Huidobro, J. (2012) “Michael of Ephesus and the Byzantine Reception of the Aristotelian Doctrine of Natural Justice” en Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, vol. 94, 274-295.

Golitsis, P. (2016a) “The Manuscript Tradition of Alexander of Aphrodisias’ Commentary

on Aristotle’s Metaphysics: Towards a New Critical Edition” en Revue d’histoire des textes, vol. 11, 55-94.

Golitsis, P. (2016b) “Editing Aristotle’s Metaphysics: A Response to Silvia Fazzo’s Critical

Appraisal of Oliver Primavesi’s Edition of Metaphysics Alpha” en Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 98.4, 458-473.

Golitsis, P. (2021) “Preface to the Greek Text” en Falcon, A. y Stavrianeas, S. (2021b) (eds.), pp.35-39.

Hadot, I. (1990) (dir.) Simplicius: Commentaire sur les Catégories. Traduction commentée, Leiden.

Harlfinger (1979) “Zur Überlieferungsgeschichte der Metaphysik” en P. Aubenque (ed.), Études sur la Métaphysique d’Aristote. Actes du VI Symposium Aristotelicum, París, 7-33.

Hayduck, M. (1891) Alexandri Aphrodisiensis in Aristotelis metaphysica commentaria, Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca I, Berlín.

Hayduck, M. (1901) Michaelis Ephesii in librum quintum ethicorum Nicomacheorum commentarium. Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca XXII.3, Berlín.

Hayduck, M. (1903) Ioannis Philoponi (Michaelis Ephesii) in libros de generatione animalium commentaria. Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca XIV.3, Berlín

Hayduck, M. (1904) Michaelis Ephesii in libros de partibus animalium, de animalium motione, de animalium incessu commentaria. Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca XXII.2, Berlín.

Hellmann, O. (2015) “On the Interface of Philology and Science: The Case of Zoology” en F. Montanari et alii (eds.) (2015), 1235-1266.

Heylbut, G. (1892) Eustratii et Michaelis et anonyma in ethica Nicomachea commentaria Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca XX, Berlín.

Ierodiakonou, K. (2009) “Some Observations on Michael of Ephesus’ Comments on Nicomachean Ethics X” en Barber, C. y Jenkins, D. (eds.) (2009), 185-201.

Ierodiakonou, K. (2012) “Byzantine philosophy revisited (a decade after)” en B. Bydén y K. Ierodiakonou K. (eds.) (2012),1-21.

Ierodiakonou, K. (2020) “Michael of Efhesus” en Lagerlund, H. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy. Philosophy between 500 and 1500. Second Edition, Dordrecht, 1201-1203.

Immisch, O. (1909) Scholia et Glossae in Aristotelis Politica, Leipzig; seg. ed. (1929) Aristoteles Politica, xvii-xxi y 293-327, Teubner.

Irwin, T. (1988) Aristotle’s First Principles, Oxford.

Kaldellis, A. (2009) “Classical Scholarship in Twelfth-Century Byzantium” en en C. Barber y D. Jenkins (eds.) (2009), 1-43.

Kalogerídou, Ο. (2010) Μιχαήλ Εφεσίου Εις το Αριστοτέλους περί ζώων γενέσεως: από την αρχαία εξηγητική παράδοση στη βυζαντινή ερμηνευτική πρακτική, Tesalónica.

Karbowski, J. (2019) Aristotle's method in ethics : philosophy in practice, Cambridge.

Konstan, D. (2001) Aspasius, Anonymous, Michael of Ephesus: On Aristotle Nicomachean Ethics 8-9, London.

Kotwick, M. E. (2016) Alexander of Aphrodisias and the Text of Aristotle’s Metaphysics, Berkeley -Cal.

Kotwick, M. E. (2021) “Aristotle, Metaphysics A 10, 993a13–15: A new reading and its implication for the unity of book Alpha.”, Classical Quarterly 71, 183–88.

Krumbacher, K. (1891) Geschichte der Byzantinischen Litteratur, Munich.

Kullmann, W. (1974) Wissenschaft und Methode, Berlín.

Kullmann, W. (2014) Aristoteles als Naturwissenschaftler, Boston – Berlín – Munich.

Kullmann, W. y Föllinger, S. (1997) (eds.) Aristotelische Biologie: Intentionen, Methoden, Ergebnisse, Stuttgart

Le Blond, J.-M. (1945) Aristote, philosophe de la vie: Le livre premier du traité sur les Parties des Animaux, París.

Le Blond, J.-M. (1995) Aristote: Parties des animaux livre I. Traduction et notes par J.-M. Le Blond, Introducción et mises á jour par Pierre Pellegrin, París.

Lennox, J. (1994) “The Disappearance of Aristotle's Biology: A Hellenistic Mystery” en Apeiron 27-4, 7-24.

Lennox, J. G. (2001a) Aristotle On the Parts of Animals Translated with a Commentary, Oxford.

Lennox, J. G. (2001b) Aristotle’s Philosophy of Biology. Studies in the Origins of Life Science, Cambridge.

Lennox, J. (2010) “The unity and purpose of On the Parts of Animals I” en Lennox, J. G. y Bolton, R. (eds.) (2010), 56-77.

Lennox, J. G. y Bolton R. (2010) (eds.) Being, Nature, and Life in Aristotle. Essay in Honor of Allan Gotthelf, Cambridge.

Leunissen, M. (2010) Explanation and Teleology in Aristotle’s Science of Nature, Cambridge.

Leunissen, M. (2015) “Aristotle on knowing natural science for the sake of living well” en Henry, D. y Nielsen, K. M. (eds.) Bridging the Gap between Aristotle’s Science and Ethics, Cambridge, 214-231.

Liddell, H. G. y Scott, R. (Comp.), Stuart Jones, H. (Rev.), McKenzie, R. (Ass.) (ninth ed. 1940 with rev. supp. 1996) A Greek-English Lexicon, Oxford.

Lloyd, G. E. R. (1996) Aristotelian Explorations, Cambridge.

Longo, A. (2009) Syrianus et la metaphysique de l'antiquité tardive, Génova.

Louis, P. (1957-1993) Aristote. Les parties des animaux, París.

Luna, C. (2001) Trois études sur la tradition des commentaires anciens à la Métaphysique d'Aristote, Leiden – Boston – Köln.

Mariev, S. (2015) “Theoretical eudaimonia in Michael of Ephesus” en Quaestio 15, 185-199.

Mercken, H. P. F. (1990) “The Greek commentators on Aristotle's Ethics” en R. Sorabji (ed) (1990),

Mombello, E. (2015) “La peirástica socrática de Aristóteles” en Archai: revista de estudos sobre as origens do pensamento ocidental, 14, São Paulo, 109-136.

Mombello, E. (2020) “Aristóteles: sobre quien ha sido instruido (πεπαιδευμένος) en PA I.1” en V. Suñol y M. Berrón (comp.) Educación, arte y política en la filosofía antigua: Actas del IV Simposio Nacional de la AAFA, Santa Fe, 353-368, (recup. https://www.academia.edu/43395241).

Montanari, F., Matthaios, S. y Rengakos, A. (eds.) (2015) Brill’s Companion to Ancient Greek Scholarship, vol 1 (History Disciplinary Profiles), Leiden – Boston.

Movia, G. (2007) Alessandro di Afrodisia e Pseudo Alessandro: commentario alla Metafisica di Aristotele, Milán.

Ogle, W. (1882) Aristotle on the Parts of Animals, London.

Peck, A. L. (1961) Aristotle: Parts of Animals, Cambridge (Mass.) - London.

Pellegrin, P. (1995) “Introduction” en Le Blond (1995), 3-33.

Praechter, K. (1990) “Review of the Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca” en R. Sorabji (1990), 31-54.

Preus, A. (1981) Aristotle and Michael of Ephesus on the Movement and Progression of Animals. Translated, with Introduction and Notes, New York.

Preus, A. (1981b) “Michael of Ephesus on Aristotle IA and MA” en Proceedings of the 1978 World Congress on Aristotle, v. 2, Atenas, 21–30.

Primavesi, O. (2012) “Introduction: The Transmission of the Text and the Riddle of the Two Versions” en Steel, C. (ed.) Aristotle’s Metaphysics Alpha, 387-464.

Primavesi, O. (2018) Aristoteles: De motu animalium. Über die Bewegung der Lebewesen. Historisch-kritische Edition des griechischen Textes und philologische Einleitung. (Deutsche Übersetzung, philosophische Einleitung und erklärende Anmerkungen de Klaus Corcilius), Hamburgo.

Ross, W. D. (1924) Aristotle’s Metaphysics, A Revised Text with Introduction and Commentary, II vols., Oxford.

Ross, W. D. (1955/2001) Aristotle: Parva Naturalia. A Revised Text with Introduction and Commentary, Oxford.

Sabbídou, A. (2019) Ο υπομνηματισμός του Μιχαήλ Εφεσίου στο ένατο βιβλίο των Ηθικών Νικομαχείων, Tesalónica.

Sharples, R. (2008) “¿La escuela de Alejandro de Afrodisia?” en Diánoia liii, 61, 3-46.

Sorabji, R. (ed.) (1990) Aristotle Transformed: The Ancient Commentators and Their Influence, London.

Sorabji, R. y Sharples, R. (1989) “Introduction” en W. E. Dooley (1989) (trad.), Alexander of Aphrodisias: On Aristotles’s Metaphysics 1, Ithaca – New York, 1-4.

Suñol, V. (2013) “El comentario como práctica de la filosofía: desde el Aristotelismo a la Patrística” en Marta Alesso (ed.) (2013) Hermenéutica de los géneros literarios: de la Antigüedad al cristianismo, Buenos Aires, 117-144.

Torraca, L. (1958) Il I Libro del de Partibus Animalium di Aristotele, Napoli.

Trizio, M. (2007) “Byzantine Philosophy as a Contemporary Historiographical Project” en Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie médiévales 74.1, 247-294.

Vitelli, H (1887-1888) Ioannis Philoponi in Aristotelis physicorum libros octo commentaria, Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca vols. 16 y 17, Berlín.

Wallies, M. (1898) Alexandri quod fertur in Aristotelis sophisticos elenchos commentarium. Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca 2.3, Berlín.

Wendland, P. (1901) Alexandri in librum de sensu commentarium. Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca 3.1, Berlín.

Wendland, P. (1903) Michaelis Ephesii in parva naturalia commentaria. Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca 22.1, Berlín.

Wilberding, J., Trompeter, J. y Rigolo, A. (2019) Michael of Ephesus: On Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics 10, Themistius: On Virtue, London.

Zingano, M. (2008) “O Tratado do Impulso e da Faculdade Impulsiva de Alexandre de Afrodísia e sua versão em Miguel de Éfeso” en Journal of Ancient Philosophy II.2, 1-22.

Zucker, A. (2016) “Themistius” en Falcon, A. (ed.) Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Aristotle in Antiquity, Leiden – Boston, 358-373.

Downloads

Published

2022-10-06

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Mombello, E. H. (2022). El Comentario de Miguel de Éfeso a PA A1 en el Origen Griego de la Rama Biológica de la Tradición Aristotélica. Journal of Ancient Philosophy, 16(2), 195-252. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1981-9471.v16i2p195-252