How Does Aristotle Understand the Paradox of the Meno?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1981-9471.v17i1p80-95Keywords:
Aristotle, Meno, Posterior Analytics, Prior Analytics, Universal Knowledge, Knowledge of ParticularsAbstract
I focus on the distinction between universal and particular knowledge or knowledge simpliciter in APr 2.21 and APo 1.1 as Aristotle’s explicit response to the paradox of the Meno. I attempt to derive a picture of Aristotle’s understanding of the philosophical problem underlying that paradox by asking what that problem would have to be in order for this distinction to make sense as a response to it. I consider two ways of taking the distinction, and argue that both point towards a problem about deriving knowledge of particulars from knowledge of universals as the fundamental problem underlying Aristotle’s understanding of the Meno paradox.
Downloads
References
Barnes J. (Ed). The Complete Works of Aristotle, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984.
Barnes J. Posterior Analytics, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993.
Bronstein D. Aristotle on Knowledge and Learning, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.
Charles D. “The Paradox in the Meno and Aristotle’s Attempts to Solve it”, in D. Charles (ed.), Definition in Greek Philosophy, Oxford: OUP, 2010, pp. 115-150.
Ferejohn M. “Meno’s Paradox and De Re Knowledge in Aristotle’s Theory of Demonstration”, History of Philosophy Quarterly, 5, 1988, pp. 99-117.
Fine G. The Possibility of Inquiry: Meno’s Paradox from Socrates to Sextus, Oxford: OUP, 2014.
Gifford, M. “Lexical Anomolies in the Introduction to the Posterior Analytics Part I”, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, Vol. 19, 2000, pp. 163-223.
Gifford M. “Aristotle on Platonic Recollection and the Paradox of Knowing Universals: Prior Analytics B.21 67a8-30”, Phronesis, Vol. 44, 1999, pp. 1-29.
Jenkinson, A. J. (trans). Prior Analytics in Barnes J., The Complete Works of Aristotle, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984.
LaBarge S. “Aristotle on ‘Simultaneous Learning’ in Posterior Analytics 1.1 and Prior Analytics 2.21”, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, Vol. 27, 2004, pp. 177-215.
Morison, B. “An Aristotelian Distinction between Two Types of Knowledge”, Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy, Vol. 27, 2012, pp. 29– 57.
Ross, W. D. Aristotle’s Prior and Posterior Analytics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1949.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Nathan Elvidge
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC By 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
