Individuo e Individuale in Aristotele

Authors

  • Barbara Botter Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1981-9471.v4i2p1-21

Abstract

This is a translation into Italian, accompanied by a brief commentary of chapter 2 of Aristotle’s Categories. In this text Aristotle presents the distinction between individual substances such as Socrates or Bucephalus and their species and genera as the distinction between primary (prw=tai) and secondary (deu/terai) substances (2a11-19). This distinction, in turn, is a distinction between substances that are particulars and substances that are universals. In the Categories Aristotle defines a primary substance as that which is neither said of nor in a subject (2a11–13). Being said of a subject and being in a subject are the only relations of metaphysical predication Aristotle recognizes in the Categories.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2010-12-01

How to Cite

Botter, B. (2010). Individuo e Individuale in Aristotele. Journal of Ancient Philosophy, 4(2), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1981-9471.v4i2p1-21

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 2 (2010)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC By 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).